bifcake
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2002
- Posts
- 2,133
- Likes
- 761
YOu're right, Jasper. That's another aspect that I didn't even consider. Unless there is overwhelming evidence that a new format is SUBSTANTIALLY better than the old, in more than one way, it's very difficult to get the average consumer to budge.
Since packaging is more important than the product and form is more important than substance, convinience is more important than fidelity. So, what I'm afraid of is that we'll be all doomed to MP3 hell in 5 years.
Unless of course, someone comes up with a digital format that will have the same fidelity as SACD encoding, will be the same size as current MP3 format and will be fully open, allowing people to freely copy the songs.
Since packaging is more important than the product and form is more important than substance, convinience is more important than fidelity. So, what I'm afraid of is that we'll be all doomed to MP3 hell in 5 years.
Unless of course, someone comes up with a digital format that will have the same fidelity as SACD encoding, will be the same size as current MP3 format and will be fully open, allowing people to freely copy the songs.