Triple-Fi 10's or make a switch?
Aug 16, 2009 at 2:03 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 10

Rebel908

New Head-Fier
Joined
Jun 16, 2009
Posts
37
Likes
0
I'm looking for opinions about IEM's.

I've been using the Triple-Fi 10's for a few months now and they are simply great. The fit is still a little of a bother, but they still work amazingly.

However, the fit remains a problem. I was looking at the Shure 530's and the Klipsch Image S4. I understand that the Shure 530's will not disappoint, especially since it uses a Triple speaker system (is it better than the Triple-Fi triple armature set-up?).

Will there be a significant change between what I have now and what I may get?
 
Aug 16, 2009 at 2:11 PM Post #2 of 10
Coming from the TF10pro the SE530 can disappoint. Both use triple armature designs, and Shure means armatures when they mention speakers. The SE530 is a different flavor and not technically better or worse. I personally find the TF10pro to have fewer flaws than the SE530, though you might prefer the inverted (as compared to the TF10pro), mid-centric sound signature. This sound signature comprises most of the difference. I would only consider the SE530 if I could make back a significant portion of the investment selling the TF10pro, and only due to comfort issues. I did find the comfort of the TF10pro horrid compared to most universals, but I only tried and did not own them and therefore did not have enough time to experiment with tips.
 
Aug 16, 2009 at 4:40 PM Post #3 of 10
ATH_CK100 is upgrade over TF10Pro, it shows more details in highs and mids than Tf10Pro with grea extention in bass area but it's need some burn in to fully open up and overall it's easy to wear. There are few more IEMs Like Westone UM3x, Westone3 and Sennehiser IE8 they all are really good to shows details in music and fun to listen.
 
Aug 17, 2009 at 5:50 AM Post #6 of 10
Sennheiser's IE8's are a lot more comfortable and it's similar to the triple.fi's in terms of sound...
 
Aug 24, 2009 at 4:31 PM Post #8 of 10
Quote:

Originally Posted by 3X0 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Coming from the TF10pro the SE530 can disappoint. Both use triple armature designs, and Shure means armatures when they mention speakers. The SE530 is a different flavor and not technically better or worse. I personally find the TF10pro to have fewer flaws than the TF10pro, though you might prefer the inverted (as compared to the TF10pro), mid-centric sound signature. This sound signature comprises most of the difference. I would only consider the SE530 if I could make back a significant portion of the investment selling the TF10pro, and only due to comfort issues. I did find the comfort of the TF10pro horrid compared to most universals, but I only tried and did not own them and therefore did not have enough time to experiment with tips.



Huh? Haha, I'm tired and it's Monday so I reread this sentence and I don't think it's me
biggrin.gif
 
Aug 24, 2009 at 4:33 PM Post #9 of 10
Quote:

Originally Posted by blackwave /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Huh? Haha, I'm tired and it's Monday so I reread this sentence and I don't think it's me
biggrin.gif



Oops, fixed that for me.
smily_headphones1.gif
 
Aug 24, 2009 at 4:39 PM Post #10 of 10
fit and comfort was definitely a problem with me, i sold my triple's and went custom in the $400 range...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top