Xcalibur255
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2008
- Posts
- 4,071
- Likes
- 3,172
Quote:
I was wondering about that when I read this statement on that site:
ECC32=CV181 Mullard Specifications (not an exact 6SN7GT substitute)
(6.3V @ 950ma Filament, Maximum ratings: Vplate=300V, Iplate=50ma, Vfil-cathode=50V, Pwatts=5)
(Typical operation: Vplate=250V, Vgrid = -4.6V, Iplate=6ma, Gm=2300, Mu=32, Rplate=14Kohms, Rk=750 ohms)
To those who can decipher the above specs, it may explain why.
I think dannie's experience was a fluke, hopefully. The two important takeaway numbers here are the filament current draw @ 950ma which is 50% higher than a 6SN7, and the Mu factor of 32 vs. the 6SN7 @ 20. The former is the reason so many warnings are attached to these tubes. Transformers designed specifically for use with a 6SN7 might not cope with the higher current draw and could go up in smoke. The second figure just means the tube has a higher gain factor, and given the same position on the volume knob the music will be playing louder with an ECC32 than it would be with a 6SN7. I think higher gain at the drivers also carries the possibility of making any audible noise in the signal path louder too. Some people wonder if the loudness is part of the reason why these tubes are perceived to be so good.