shibby
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2003
- Posts
- 72
- Likes
- 0
but they look like the PX200...
portable headphones < 50$
- Thread starter shibby
- Start date
bangraman
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2002
- Posts
- 10,305
- Likes
- 65
Quote:
Try it, then see if what you said makes sense
I have the Shure E2c & E5. Still try and use the PXC250 whenever possible.
The PX100 (on the right) is actually a different design to the PX200/PXC250...
The foam between the 'spokes' leads to the driver. And it does indeed provide no isolation. About the same as the KSC35 in fact.
| Originally posted by MD1032 "PXC 250" Yes indeed. This doesn'e make sense! How the heck can Sennheiser charge an extra 90 bucks for "better" isolation?? |
Try it, then see if what you said makes sense
I have the Shure E2c & E5. Still try and use the PXC250 whenever possible.
The PX100 (on the right) is actually a different design to the PX200/PXC250...
The foam between the 'spokes' leads to the driver. And it does indeed provide no isolation. About the same as the KSC35 in fact.
sgraphics
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2003
- Posts
- 76
- Likes
- 0
Quote:
Im a newbie here and probably shouldn't say this.. I also own the AIWA HP-X121 and think that for their price they arent that bad at all. But they arent doing they're job anymore.. bass crackles.
I own a pair of Sennheiser HD-202's. They cost very little and have excellent isolation. Actually the HD-202's have a lot of bass and highs.. weak middles though. That might be an advantage if you listen to music at 128 kbps because 128 compared to 192 sounds really flat - the extra bass and highs would get some more depth into 128. So the cheap HD-202's wouldn't be a bad choice.. HD-212 although are said to be worth the $ difference to the HD-202's
But hey, im a newbie so I could be wrong ™
| Originally posted by shibby Just for comparesent I now own a pear of AIWA HP-X121...and I kind of like them (be gentle 
|
Im a newbie here and probably shouldn't say this.. I also own the AIWA HP-X121 and think that for their price they arent that bad at all. But they arent doing they're job anymore.. bass crackles.
I own a pair of Sennheiser HD-202's. They cost very little and have excellent isolation. Actually the HD-202's have a lot of bass and highs.. weak middles though. That might be an advantage if you listen to music at 128 kbps because 128 compared to 192 sounds really flat - the extra bass and highs would get some more depth into 128. So the cheap HD-202's wouldn't be a bad choice.. HD-212 although are said to be worth the $ difference to the HD-202's
But hey, im a newbie so I could be wrong ™
The Aiwa X222 were my first "decent" cans, and on their own they sound OK, good for portable use when you don't want to screw up your good cans, but if I A-B them with my HD590, their inferiority becomes apparent.
shibby
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2003
- Posts
- 72
- Likes
- 0
The only problem is size! I would have bought the senn 497 if size wasn't an issue...
If I'll pot the PX 200 in my pock while folded, will they fit right? What can I compare them to (cellophane, wallet, glasses)?
Are they strong enough so they won't brake if presser will be applied?
If I'll pot the PX 200 in my pock while folded, will they fit right? What can I compare them to (cellophane, wallet, glasses)?
Are they strong enough so they won't brake if presser will be applied?
Users who are viewing this thread
