Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › JVC Flats...No, I'm Not Crazy!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

JVC Flats...No, I'm Not Crazy!

post #1 of 10
5/22/09 at 8:14pm
Thread Starter 
About a week ago someone on here posted a thread (in the full size forums) about the JVC flats. I read it and became curious so I headed over to my local Biglots store and picked up a pair for $10.

When I got home I was very skeptical about these and wondered if I had made a mistake. So I plugged them into my Asus laptop (i didn't have access to any of my amps) and all I can say is that I'm VERY impressed.

First they are extremely lightweight and very comfortable. The have good isolation and very little leakage. The sound quality is very good. The highs are a little rolled off, and the bass is light but punchy. The Mids are where these headphones shine, they are very clear and aggressive (very Grado like). They are closed and have that closed sound with a slight airyness too them.

Are these Giant killers: No. They are however a great deal for $10. These are perfect closed portable cans (that you won't be afraid to break) with good sound quality and a low price tag. In the thread I read on these it said the JVC could compete with cans like the V600's & it's price-brackets and have to say I completely agree! For $10 bucks their a steal!
Reply
post #2 of 10
5/22/09 at 8:25pm
Can they be modded to bring out the bass and treble? I know the Kramer mod made a huge difference for my KSC75s.
Reply
post #3 of 10
5/22/09 at 8:27pm
JVC "Flats" = HA-S150 (or HP-S150 in Japan)

I'm surprised that I even found a frequency response graph for these:



Source: ヘッドホン　Victor HP-S150
Reply
post #4 of 10
5/22/09 at 8:35pm
Thread Starter 
I'm not sure but for $10 it wouldn't hurt to try.
Reply
post #5 of 10
11/26/09 at 4:50am
Quote:
Originally Posted by kjk1281 View Post
JVC "Flats" = HA-S150 (or HP-S150 in Japan)

I'm surprised that I even found a frequency response graph for these:



Source: ヘッドホン　Victor HP-S150
That's an impressive response for these. Fairly flat.
Reply
post #6 of 10
11/26/09 at 5:29pm
Wow, don't know how I missed this before but that's an excellent site. I've been looking for a frequency graph of the HA-DX3 for months.
Reply
post #7 of 10
11/26/09 at 7:20pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by ljokerl View Post
Wow, don't know how I missed this before but that's an excellent site. I've been looking for a frequency graph of the HA-DX3 for months.
It's easily one of my favorite sites for reviews and graphs. Recently (edit: three months ago), the author put up an interesting article regarding manufacturing variances, using the Flats as an example. I have yet to read it all, and I'm too lazy (and unqualified) to translate it, but here's the link if anybody's interested: 第57回　ヘッドホンの個体差.
Reply
post #8 of 10
10/21/11 at 8:57am

I just exchanged a pair of Sony MDR-ZX100's for JVC flats this morning. The sonys are bloated and muddy. I should have went for the JVC Flats in the first place. They sound crisp clean and balanced! The only thing I'm not huge about is how small the earpads are. I expected them to be about MDR-V150/ZX-100 size earpads. Best pair of supra-aural headphones I've ever had.

Reply
post #9 of 10
10/21/11 at 1:26pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by kjk1281 View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by ljokerl View Post
Wow, don't know how I missed this before but that's an excellent site. I've been looking for a frequency graph of the HA-DX3 for months.
It's easily one of my favorite sites for reviews and graphs. Recently (edit: three months ago), the author put up an interesting article regarding manufacturing variances, using the Flats as an example. I have yet to read it all, and I'm too lazy (and unqualified) to translate it, but here's the link if anybody's interested: 第57回　ヘッドホンの個体差.


That's quite an interesting article, I've been wondering about that for a while. There must be some 'actual' difference in SQ as well as the 'perceived' individual differences. He picked cheap headphones on purpose since it was more likely for them to have a wider variation than the higher priced 'phones which are tightly controlled, manufacturing wise (hopefully). Still the variation is surprising, even between left and right channel of the same unit.

 

Reply
post #10 of 10
12/24/11 at 11:58pm

The HAS160 is a great headphone. It is my favorite headphone under $40. Amazing since this is only around $10-15. I like it much better than the portapro, and almost as much as the PX100. The HAS160 is so neutral. It almost sounds like a mini Sony V6.


Edited by JK1 - 12/25/11 at 3:14pm
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › JVC Flats...No, I'm Not Crazy!