The Definitive example amp for the complex vs simple wars
Mar 23, 2003 at 1:06 AM Post #16 of 24
Hey,

It costed me 50 dollars per board. And you can have two channel from one board. So including PSU and Tranny, the total cost of the amp was about 100 bucks. I think it is really good way to try out SMD stuffs. The bad part is that everything is SMD. So you better have some SMD resistors and caps lying around, because you gotta change some values to get it working as headphone amp.

T
 
Mar 23, 2003 at 5:23 PM Post #17 of 24
630 parts....

Guy's you must read more carefully! All transistors are doubled or even tripled! In all places I have made room for TO-92 types and SOT23. The input stage has even room for SOT363, these tiny matched transistors.

Not 630 parts! but not few.....

Those of you who wonders, I have made two discrete opamps. The first is a preamp and the second one is the correction amp.

The preamp has parallel connected input transistors in order to get low noise with cheap transistors. You can also use MAT02/03 and even get those in parallel in order to ger ultra low noise.
 
Mar 23, 2003 at 5:51 PM Post #18 of 24
Quote:

Originally posted by peranders
630 parts....

Guy's you must read more carefully! All transistors are doubled or even tripled! In all places I have made room for TO-92 types and SOT23. The input stage has even room for SOT363, these tiny matched transistors.

Not 630 parts! but not few.....

Those of you who wonders, I have made two discrete opamps. The first is a preamp and the second one is the correction amp.

The preamp has parallel connected input transistors in order to get low noise with cheap transistors. You can also use MAT02/03 and even get those in parallel in order to ger ultra low noise.


Okay, sorry, I just checked the # of items in the excell spreadsheet, I didn't realize you put alternate parts there too. Just how many parts are there?
 
Mar 23, 2003 at 8:10 PM Post #20 of 24
Peranders -

My pseudo-diy amp has about 20 parts. I guess in your eyes, I am a minimalist. ... ok ok ok ... I am a lazy person.

Just curious, why not use MAT02 and MAT03? They are supposed to be super high grade matched transistor pairs. I am assuming you use differential pair inputs. They could be replaced with them. Supposedly these make noise level below the level of passive noise of resistors according to TNT site.

(I am just mentioning because last night I just declined to sample MAT02/03 from AD. ... Yeah I am already regretting my choice.)

Tomo
 
Mar 23, 2003 at 8:15 PM Post #21 of 24
Oh,

I forget. I can build 3 para-pushpull mosfet amplifier with one CHEAP chip. 74HCU04.

Heehee, my laziness never cease to amaze me.

Tomo

P.S. Some dude stacked them really high to make a speaker amp. Call that a crazy man. (He had to make a heatsink just for it.)
 
Mar 23, 2003 at 10:11 PM Post #23 of 24
Peranders -

That is not what I meant. What I mean is that wouldn't it be more expedient to have MAT02/03 than to have many transistors which you will have to match deligently? Spec says that MAT02/03 might offer lower noise level.

Tomo
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top