Rate The Last Movie You Watched
Apr 16, 2016 at 6:12 PM Post #19,156 of 24,655
   
Not sure - I watched this one on YouTube. Some of the uploads seem worse than others though whether that's down to the original print on the upload quality I couldn't say; first one I tried looked pretty aquatic yeah, but this one was watchable. Maybe should have gone for YT's pay-per-view version but I'm a cheapskate 
biggrin.gif
 


Thanks for the link. Just reading the wiki. Apparently a few "remasters" on in colour no less by Ray Harryhaussen (how could you Ray??). Some odd copywright shenanigans as well. I think I'll look for the Criterion edition should be discount bin fodder around here.
 
Apr 16, 2016 at 10:30 PM Post #19,157 of 24,655
Film Noir doesn't get a whole lot better IMO. I'm not an expert or anything, but I can tell you a few other Noirs that I rate: Kiss Me Deadly, The Maltese Falcon, Cry of the City, Gilda, The Dark Mirror, The Postman Always Rings Twice, Touch of Evil, Notorious, The Big Sleep, The Third Man... it was a fine time for Hollywood, in retrospect. I'd also add Drunken Angel. Some would probably say it wasn't Film Noir but I see it as Kurosawa's take on the style - the long shadows relocated to a Tokyo slum!


It's the film noir that makes you reconsider your expectations of film noir. I've seen The Maltese Falcon and The Third Man. Enjoyed both immensely. I need to track some of these down!

I did watch on or your other recent recommendations in a two day binge I sorely needed.

Nightcrawler
7.8/10


I mentioned multiple times that I was probably not going to watch this, but decided to give it a shot. The mood just struck for something unique and it felt like the time for it. Well done movie. Watching it felt like reading the tasting notes on a wine or coffee bean. Had a bit of that Michael Mann feel of neon from Collateral, an occasional hint of film noir, random sprinkles of dark commedy. It felt a bit too pleased with itself at times though.

Attention to detail was nice and the concept was surely unique. I could have done without the nod to American Psycho personally, but it is what it is and wasn't exactly out of place, just not on original.

Gyllenhaal did a great job with the part tbh. As most here said. Still not my cup of tea but credit where it's due.

The only thing that was a bit unclear to me was the message. Not really sure what the point of the movie was. Not that a movie needs to have a point. There are many that are an end in themselves. But this one didn't feel like that. It almost came of as satire, but I don't know. Anyone have any background or insight here?

That's really what pushed it down those two tenths.


Ex Machina
7.8/10


Came off a bit pretentious at times but overall really well done. The pacing was a little off in the first third, almost a rush to get into the story, hastily set up with little to no viewer investment, but I can see where they wanted to cut a bit from an already reasonably long movie. It started to catch up in the middle and by the last half an hour it had hit its stride. One of the stronger finishes I've recently seen, almost like the rest of the movie was just a setup, which is unfortunate.

This movie hit a lot of buttons carefully and judiciously enough to set it apart. They did a bang up job in the "this is the not too distant future" color temperature and clean wide shots when needed. Maybe a bit too many of the rustling trees, falling water shots. It didn't need those to set atmosphere or humanize things. The script and actors were doing a fine job of it.

Just enough little misses for me to knock it below an 8, but overall very much worth a watch.


The Mist
5.5/10 - 6 tops


This felt like a waste. There was potential here, but for a 2 hour movie, they gave too much away too early. There was no build. The opening was incredibly strong and beautifully edited and paced IMO. Like "amazing TV-Movie here I come" opening. Then ending was good, although once they set the ball in motion, largely predictable. Everything in between, was a solid meh.

It took itself too seriously when it should probably have been campy. A real issue with suspension of disbelief. There were a couple of "oh please" moments when they could reaaaaally have done more with less.

Overall a miss, but ok for a lazy Sunday at home.


Coherence
8.7/10

Thanks for the recommendation!

This ended up being the sweet surprise of the binge. It exemplifies how much you can do with very little. A movie within a play within a movie. One of the few movies that had me guessing the whole way and originality in spades. Toed perfect fine line between explanation and pushing the story along. The writing was very careful to not have anyone go too off the rails with science or technology lectures.

The acting was mostly very solid. The pacing was excellent and the movie was overall very tightly done. Nothing lingered too much where it shouldn't. Some good jokes here and there broke up the seriousness and all the while it knew when it should be serious and when it shouldn't. There were a lot of layers here and none of them felt tacked on for "depth".

What the movie did really well was stay away from the obvious foreshadowing tactics which give away plot or characterization or a characters "true self" or intent. instead of building tension by a reasonably observant audience knowing a bit more than the protagonist, tension between as built by there being very little to clue the audience in and them being "lost" along the way with the characters. It's almost a scenario where everything and nothing is as it seems.

This is definitely worth a rewatch.
 
Apr 16, 2016 at 10:59 PM Post #19,158 of 24,655
Good calls on all the films there Winter.
 
Still confuse The Mist with The Fog. One was at least mildly entertaining Allthough I would recomend 2008's Alien Raiders http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0996979/
over either of them. Another film that proves that 10 bucks and a bag of Fritos budget does not have to suck .
 
Review Time.
 
 Below (2002)  8/10     
 
Written by David Twohy (who directs here as well) and Darren Aronofsky this overlooked haunted  soldier" film delivers where others fall into kitch and cliche. The suspense is palpable due largely to the confining environment in which it takes place. Paced very well and does not blow the storyline with the usual over exposition at an early stage that some films of this ilk do. Makes tremendous use of non headliner cast and gets on with the job at some points perhaps a little too effeciently. I understand budget was hard to get for this one and if that is true Twohy did a remarkable job here.
 
Apr 17, 2016 at 5:00 AM Post #19,160 of 24,655
  Good calls on all the films there Winter.
 
Still confuse The Mist with The Fog. One was at least mildly entertaining Allthough I would recomend 2008's Alien Raiders http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0996979/
over either of them. Another film that proves that 10 bucks and a bag of Fritos budget does not have to suck .
 

 
Enjoyed reading your reviews @vwinter. Oddly, I rated them all slightly higher except Coherence, which I rated a tad lower! The one I disagree most on with you guys is The Mist - it really works for me as a modern creature feature and I don't think it does take itself too seriously either, it's something of a throwback to 50s monster movies; the fact there is a black and white version is testament to that fact really. I also dig that the Lovecraft is strong with it - all the tentacles, nameless horrors and of course, the impossibly tall creature (although admittedly this had a lot more impact on the big screen!)
 
Apr 17, 2016 at 12:57 PM Post #19,161 of 24,655
Thanks guys!
 
Quote:
  Good calls on all the films there Winter.
 
Still confuse The Mist with The Fog. One was at least mildly entertaining Allthough I would recomend 2008's Alien Raiders http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0996979/
over either of them. Another film that proves that 10 bucks and a bag of Fritos budget does not have to suck .
 
Review Time.
 
 Below (2002)  8/10     
 
Written by David Twohy (who directs here as well) and Darren Aronofsky this overlooked haunted  soldier" film delivers where others fall into kitch and cliche. The suspense is palpable due largely to the confining environment in which it takes place. Paced very well and does not blow the storyline with the usual over exposition at an early stage that some films of this ilk do. Makes tremendous use of non headliner cast and gets on with the job at some points perhaps a little too effeciently. I understand budget was hard to get for this one and if that is true Twohy did a remarkable job here.

 
I would guess that The Mist is the mildly entertaining one. Unless you mean The Fog (1980), in which case, no idea (should actually watch this one).
Those two look awesome. at least one is on netflix, so that's easy to add to the ol' list. 
 
I love movies set in manmade environments underwater. The setup is both believable and tense, inherently.
 
   
Enjoyed reading your reviews @vwinter. Oddly, I rated them all slightly higher except Coherence, which I rated a tad lower! The one I disagree most on with you guys is The Mist - it really works for me as a modern creature feature and I don't think it does take itself too seriously either, it's something of a throwback to 50s monster movies; the fact there is a black and white version is testament to that fact really. I also dig that the Lovecraft is strong with it - all the tentacles, nameless horrors and of course, the impossibly tall creature (although admittedly this had a lot more impact on the big screen!)

 
It makes sense. Have my more objective rating which i then mark up/down on personal drivers. A one (or even more) point swing would make total sense.
Hm, maybe i just didn't see it as a creature feature. Got the sense that they couldn't really make a decision on which way to go and ended up on a fence. Do you think they would have been better off using practical effects for the tentacles?
 
You know, in retrospect, it would likely have been a better watch with a beer and some snacks. The impossibly tall creature was awesome actually. I have a tiny living room that i set up to be as theater-like as possible in the space and it worked really well for that part (was part of my strong ending comment). I think expectations led me to more disappointment than it could have otherwise been.
 
 
 
At my next earliest opportunity: Shivers (1975)
 
Apr 17, 2016 at 1:06 PM Post #19,162 of 24,655
   
I would guess that The Mist is the mildly entertaining one. Unless you mean The Fog (1980), in which case, no idea (should actually watch this one).
Those two look awesome. at least one is on netflix, so that's easy to add to the ol' list. 

 
I would've guessed the opposite actually, if I know Hutnicks 
biggrin.gif
 I like The Fog personally - definitely not Carpenter's strongest, but it comes during his purple patch and is a tad underrated IMO. Is there another The Fog?
 
 
It makes sense. Have my more objective rating which i then mark up/down on personal drivers. A one (or even more) point swing would make total sense.
Hm, maybe i just didn't see it as a creature feature. Got the sense that they couldn't really make a decision on which way to go and ended up on a fence. Do you think they would have been better off using practical effects for the tentacles?
 
You know, in retrospect, it would likely have been a better watch with a beer and some snacks. The impossibly tall creature was awesome actually. I have a tiny living room that i set up to be as theater-like as possible in the space and it worked really well for that part (was part of my strong ending comment). I think expectations led me to more disappointment than it could have otherwise been.
 
At my next earliest opportunity: Shivers (1975)

 
Definitely - The Mist is my idea of a good popcorn flick; it's B Movie through and through in essence. Hope you enjoy Shivers - it's where Cronenberg starts to hit his stride for me. You have to allow for the fact the budget is miniscule + it's also another B Movie really, but the Cronenberg DNA is there.
 
Apr 17, 2016 at 3:45 PM Post #19,163 of 24,655
I think the Fog is the better product of the two. The Mist just seemed so poorly paced for me that it really came off as a hard watch. I would have graded it up with made for TV primetime horror.
 
Apr 17, 2016 at 5:06 PM Post #19,165 of 24,655
I would've guessed the opposite actually, if I know Hutnicks :D  I like The Fog personally - definitely not Carpenter's strongest, but it comes during his purple patch and is a tad underrated IMO. Is there another The Fog?


Definitely - The Mist is my idea of a good popcorn flick; it's B Movie through and through in essence. Hope you enjoy Shivers - it's where Cronenberg starts to hit his stride for me. You have to allow for the fact the budget is miniscule + it's also another B Movie really, but the Cronenberg DNA is there.


This is what excites me.

My guess was based on this The Fog:
the-fog-2005.16361.jpg

Haven't seen it but indications are less than positive.
Edit: although there is anecdotal evidence to the contrary :D
 
Apr 17, 2016 at 7:04 PM Post #19,166 of 24,655

 
Dream City - 4/10
 
Going properly off the map with this one! Try to imagine The Prisoner, re-shot in Renaissance Germany with a script that plays out like a badly translated J.G. Ballard novel. I think it's broadly supposed to be an allegory about how utopias always fail due to man's inherent vices, but this long film is so unfocused (and I'm not just talking about the camera work), it's hard to tell! The whole thing feels like a Dadaist Happening.
 
A struggling artist is persuaded by a mysterious stranger to move from Munich to a town of perfect freedom, a city of unfettered dreams - bizarrely, a brick-for-brick recreation of a German town somewhere in the Middle East (a neat way of cutting down on production costs - film a few scenes in the desert, then it's back to Germany for the rest of the shoot!) Florian duly packs his bags and heads with his wife for this promised land, created by his old school friend Klaus, who bizarrely (again - bizarre is the key word with this film) now resembles the Pope. The spectre of Klaus hangs over proceedings like Kurtz and finds further parallels in the death cult that underlies the apparent civility of the town. Klaus's appearance towards the end as a figurative - and literal - straw man ties into a sub-plot centred around Hercules Bell, a rabble-rouser who leads the crowd into a violent coup d'état as the town is blown up around them. The ending sequence sees Florian raping Olimpia against a backdrop of chaos, no doubt another allusion among many.
 
There are too many problems to list with this film and it's not hard to see why it remains in the wilderness - a sprawling mess that no amount of time in the editing room could fix. But in a way, I wouldn't want to fix it anyway; it's fascinating as it is and for all its faults, I'm glad stuff like this is out there.
 
Apr 17, 2016 at 7:47 PM Post #19,167 of 24,655
Hmmmm. This right after Things to Come, I see a pattern emerging:wink:
 
BTW the Criterion TTC was quite good. Not excellent and I am sure they could do a better remaster but much more watchable than the undersea version I previously watched. Excellent flic
 
Apr 17, 2016 at 11:58 PM Post #19,168 of 24,655
Shivers (1975)
8.3/10


Just yes.
This was a lot of fun through and through. Interesting pacing, cuts, camerawork and framing. Very satisfying ending. Definitely scratched an itch.

Estimated budget was 179k CAD, which, if my math is right, puts it at like 640K in today's USD. Not exactly a peanuts budgets for what you see. But the direction made it feel bigger and cleaner than it actually was.

I actually expected more from some of the scenes haha, like the bathtub scene. Not sure what this "more" was exactly, but some of the scenes were a hair short of full throttle great/satisfying.
 
Apr 18, 2016 at 2:40 AM Post #19,170 of 24,655
He Never Died (2015) - 7/10

A strange one, and a depressing statement about immortality. A must-see if you like Henry Rollins
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top