KurtW
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2001
- Posts
- 971
- Likes
- 13
I have updated my buffer distortion measurements. The new data was taken in the META42 amp using the AD8620 op amp but with a higher inner loop gain than before (around 333), which benefits all but the best buffers. I have shown only the data for low resistive load since the distortion was always much lower than with a higher resistance load. I also boosted the level of my signal generator a bit from before which lowers the noise floor and gives lower THD. The first data was taken at 1v output but I measured several buffers ranging from 0.5v to 4v and the data was very close to the same. The measurement was made at 1KHz, but I have not seen much variation due to frequency.
With 31 ohm load, 1.0v output:
BUFFER,% THD,2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5 harmonic
EL2001,0.080-69-64-83-69
EL2001 x 2,0.069-74-65-87-70
EL2001 x 3,0.056-76-66-87-72
EL2002,0.040-71-70-85-76
EL2002 x 2,0.026-75-76-89-80
EL2002 x 4,0.021-79-83-91-84
HA5002, 0.043-83-69-89-74
HA5002 x 2,0.027-82-79-90-81
HA5002 x 4,0.021-82-86-90-84
BUF634 x 2,0.023-79-83-92-87
EL2008,0.023-79-78-90-83
EL2009,0.021-83-91-91-84
I also measured them with a real headphone load, a cheap pair of Panasonic headphones that came with a PCDP. The level was 0.5v, which was very loud. You can see the distortion is higher with a real load, but the buffers that did the best with a resistive load also performed better with the headphone load.
With cheap Panasonic headphones, 0.5v output:
BUFFER,% THD
EL2001,0.150
EL2001 x 2,0.104
EL2001 x 3,0.086
EL2002,0.066
EL2002 x 2,0.038
EL2002 x 4,0.027
HA5002, 0.067
HA5002 x 2,0.034
HA5002 x 4,0.027
BUF634 x 2,0.029
EL2008,0.027
EL2009,0.025
Thanks to Geom_tol for the loan of the EL2009 for these tests. It wins. It's also discontinued and now very expensive if you can even find them. Some of the other buffers like the HA5002 and the BUF634 aren't too far behind as long as you use multiple buffers, and they are still currently available. The BUF634's I used were in a TO220 package and had the WB pin tied to V-, the HA5002s were DIPs.
I should point out that only the EL2001 and EL2002 will plug into the META42 board directly.
With 31 ohm load, 1.0v output:
BUFFER,% THD,2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5 harmonic
EL2001,0.080-69-64-83-69
EL2001 x 2,0.069-74-65-87-70
EL2001 x 3,0.056-76-66-87-72
EL2002,0.040-71-70-85-76
EL2002 x 2,0.026-75-76-89-80
EL2002 x 4,0.021-79-83-91-84
HA5002, 0.043-83-69-89-74
HA5002 x 2,0.027-82-79-90-81
HA5002 x 4,0.021-82-86-90-84
BUF634 x 2,0.023-79-83-92-87
EL2008,0.023-79-78-90-83
EL2009,0.021-83-91-91-84
I also measured them with a real headphone load, a cheap pair of Panasonic headphones that came with a PCDP. The level was 0.5v, which was very loud. You can see the distortion is higher with a real load, but the buffers that did the best with a resistive load also performed better with the headphone load.
With cheap Panasonic headphones, 0.5v output:
BUFFER,% THD
EL2001,0.150
EL2001 x 2,0.104
EL2001 x 3,0.086
EL2002,0.066
EL2002 x 2,0.038
EL2002 x 4,0.027
HA5002, 0.067
HA5002 x 2,0.034
HA5002 x 4,0.027
BUF634 x 2,0.029
EL2008,0.027
EL2009,0.025
Thanks to Geom_tol for the loan of the EL2009 for these tests. It wins. It's also discontinued and now very expensive if you can even find them. Some of the other buffers like the HA5002 and the BUF634 aren't too far behind as long as you use multiple buffers, and they are still currently available. The BUF634's I used were in a TO220 package and had the WB pin tied to V-, the HA5002s were DIPs.
I should point out that only the EL2001 and EL2002 will plug into the META42 board directly.