YEAHHHHH New iPods!!!!
Sep 5, 2007 at 9:29 PM Post #17 of 177
The touch one looks interesting. For me if i can listen to music and surf the web at the same time in the house thats cool. On the other hand I have speakers and a laptop....
smily_headphones1.gif
 
Sep 5, 2007 at 9:35 PM Post #18 of 177
I only care about sound quality and iPods usually aren't the best so it's nearly irrelevent to me. It seems the more they pack in, the worst the quality gets IMO. I don't use a lot of space since I manage my songs weekly with only 1GB of space so any of these models would do. If I wanted to put all my music on there, I couldn't since 160GB is still not enough to have all of it. I'm most interested in the touch only for the photo application. It would be most impressive to show potential clients.
 
Sep 5, 2007 at 9:41 PM Post #19 of 177
160 GB classic looks like the only promising option for me here. The touch looks cool, but from my perspective, it would be a downgrade from my 4G 20 GB iPod (make with the space - what gives?).

Nano doesn't interest me much, and this one just looks awkward. Shuffle is just what it is, obviously. :shrugs:

(um, wrong folder?)
 
Sep 5, 2007 at 9:43 PM Post #20 of 177
Quote:

Originally Posted by GAD /img/forum/go_quote.gif
The nano is srt of cool, now with video and 16G, but there's the same problem. One TV show is 500M. The only time I watch TV is on my ipod when traveling. Four shows burns 2G. Even on 16G that sucks.

If the nano came in 40G - Hell the ipod touch too, it would be worth it to me.

GAD


Sadly it stops at 8Gb....
 
Sep 5, 2007 at 9:44 PM Post #21 of 177
Quote:

Originally Posted by lan /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I only care about sound quality and iPods usually aren't the best so it's nearly irrelevent to me. It seems the more they pack in, the worst the quality gets IMO.


I guess that's why they invented imods
wink.gif
 
Sep 5, 2007 at 9:45 PM Post #22 of 177
Quote:

Originally Posted by rhymesgalore /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Sadly it stops at 8Gb....


?
 
Sep 5, 2007 at 9:46 PM Post #23 of 177
Quote:

Originally Posted by Contrastique /img/forum/go_quote.gif
?


There's no 16GB nano, the biggest model comes with 8Gb only.
 
Sep 5, 2007 at 9:48 PM Post #24 of 177
Quote:

Originally Posted by rhymesgalore /img/forum/go_quote.gif
There's no 16GB nano, the biggest model comes with 8Gb only.


There will be:

http://www.apple.com/ipodtouch/specs.html

Screw me...sorry was thinking you were talking about the thouch thingy...
 
Sep 5, 2007 at 9:49 PM Post #25 of 177
The fact that there's "touch" written next to "iPod" didn't strike you as odd?
wink.gif


What you mean is the iPod touch. Completly different model.


EDIT: no problemo
biggrin.gif
 
Sep 5, 2007 at 9:59 PM Post #27 of 177
I think the lack of HD on the iPod touch is gonna haunt them more than they think. Sure the iPod touch is super thin, but I'd rather have 160gigs than quarter of an inch thinner. It's gonna fit in my pocket either way.
 
Sep 5, 2007 at 10:01 PM Post #28 of 177
Quote:

Originally Posted by rhymesgalore /img/forum/go_quote.gif
The fact that there's "touch" written next to "iPod" didn't strike you as odd?
wink.gif


What you mean is the iPod touch. Completly different model.


EDIT: no problemo
biggrin.gif



Haha, I was a little late again haha
icon10.gif
 
Sep 5, 2007 at 10:02 PM Post #29 of 177
Quote:

Originally Posted by DLeeWebb /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Man, I was hoping for 100GB, 120GB or even 160GB! 16GB! I'm a disappointed Apple fanboy today, that's for sure. Guess I'll be using my 5.5G 80GB for quite a while to come!
mad.gif



You were hoping for a touchable 160 you mean..?
That would have been more awesome indeed. I like the just 160 though a real lot
wink.gif
 
Sep 5, 2007 at 10:05 PM Post #30 of 177
Quote:

Originally Posted by Contrastique /img/forum/go_quote.gif
You were hoping for a touchable 160 you mean..?
That would have been more awesome indeed. I like the just 160 though a real lot
wink.gif



Exactly, I should have been more specific. If I get a new 160GB classic, they'll come out with 160GB touchscreen after Christmas! Ugghhhh!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top