I'm answering a bunch of questions below -- I'm still holding off on too much commentary on the sound, since I'm a firm believer in burn-in. They been running non-stop since I got them, though, so I'll probably chime in on their sound over the next day or two
Quote:
Originally posted by Buddha
How long / sturdy is the cable Mac? ... looks like its another 35 transplant. |
The KSC-35 cable is double-stranded (two cables next to each other) -- the UR40 cable is exactly the same thickness as *one* of the KSC-35 strands.
As for length, the cord is 4 feet, so it's pretty long.
Quote:
Originally posted by katsudon1
BTW, is it made it China? |
Yes
Quote:
Originally posted by Magicthyse
I'm presuming that the foam pad between the driver/grille is very dense? |
Not "very" dense, but not open, either. That said, the foam seems to actually hurt the sound -- I removed both foam inserts and the sound cleared up just a bit. However, removing the foam makes the UR40 even more "open" then they were originally (which was already quite open); that said, they still sound a lot like closed cans.
Quote:
Originally posted by JiPi
Btw, is that silver-ish material plastic or metal? Because on their
site they repeat 'titanium' a lot of times and I was wondering
if the titanium was that silver thing outside the phones or a
certain object in them. |
The earpiece enclosures themselves and the hinges they attach to are silver-colored plastic. The grey grills are metal.
The "titanium" specs refer to the drivers -- which really aren't titanium, either. As the pictures I posted in the KSC-35 vs. KSC-50 thread (from a few months ago) show, the drivers are thin plastic, but (as Jeff suggested) seem to simply have a silvery coating on them.
Quote:
Originally posted by jlo mein
where did you buy these from?
On the web i can barely find much info on them, much less english websites that sell them...
and $30? wow....koss has them listed on their site for $40... |
I bought mine from efunctional.com:
http://store.yahoo.com/efunctional/ur-40.html
Quote:
sorry if i sound pushy....but just curious have they burned in yet? its been like what, 4 days? |
See above
Quote:
Is the driver permanently set into the faceplate? |
No, these are just KSC-35 drivers clamped onto the black plastic faceplate.
Quote:
Also, the pics are kinda dark so its hard to tell whats going on on the front of the faceplate. Does the front have a hole in it? |
Not sure what you mean. The black plastic faceplate has a hole just big enough for the driver to be exposed. In addition, there is a piece of very thick felt-like material covering the driver opening (you can see it in my pictures above). I actually cut a hole in this felt because it was clearly "veiling" the sound.
Quote:
Originally posted by Jeff Guidry
For poops and giggles, I transplanted the drivers from my 35's into the body of the UR40. [snip] I found the sound greatly improved. The soundstage was good, instrument seperation good for a headphone of this kind. |
Jeff, this seems odd -- since the KSC-35 and UR40 use the same drivers, swapping them shouldn't change the sound of the headphone. Your experiment leads me to believe that your KSC-35 drivers are significantly burned in compared to the brand new UR40 drivers.