Pat
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2001
- Posts
- 114
- Likes
- 10
Well, I went with Ian and Neruda's suggestion to get the Altec Lansing ATP3 multimedia speakers. Perhaps I've been spoiled by my headphone setup, but I wasn't incredibly impressed with the ATP3s.
First off, they look a lot cooler in pictures than they do in real life. They're also quite small. I'd say the front panel is about the size of a TV remote. The satellites and sub are pretty light too, giving them that "cheap feel", if you know what I mean.
Versatility was another problem with the ATP3. The speakers hook up to the sub/amp unit with short, undetachable cords. Replacable speaker wires would've been much less restricting.
I found the sound quality decent at best. Maybe I was expecting too much out of a pair of multimedia speakers. Compared to my Cambrige Soundworks digital, the midrange on the ATP3 is definitely sweeter and smoother. It also seemed a tad warmer. The highs were okay, I suppose. They did get a little harsh at times though. Overall, the system is somewhat on the bright side. That was kind of a surprise to me, considering most mass market speakers cater to bass addicts.
Speaking of bass, this was one facet of the ATP3s that I found lacking. The midbass was good, well controlled an tight. But for some odd reason there was no low bass. When I tried to turning up the bass, it just got more muddy, boomy, and just plain ugly. I guess the sub is just underpowered.
I'm not a dum-bass - at least I hope not, but I was looking for speakers that were a tad more exciting than these. Something forward and in-my-face kinda thing. Perhaps it's not even possible for computer speakers.
The ATP3s aren't bad. On par, if not a bit better than the Cambridge Soundworks digital. I'll keep them. But I'll also be on the lookout for something better too.
First off, they look a lot cooler in pictures than they do in real life. They're also quite small. I'd say the front panel is about the size of a TV remote. The satellites and sub are pretty light too, giving them that "cheap feel", if you know what I mean.
Versatility was another problem with the ATP3. The speakers hook up to the sub/amp unit with short, undetachable cords. Replacable speaker wires would've been much less restricting.
I found the sound quality decent at best. Maybe I was expecting too much out of a pair of multimedia speakers. Compared to my Cambrige Soundworks digital, the midrange on the ATP3 is definitely sweeter and smoother. It also seemed a tad warmer. The highs were okay, I suppose. They did get a little harsh at times though. Overall, the system is somewhat on the bright side. That was kind of a surprise to me, considering most mass market speakers cater to bass addicts.
Speaking of bass, this was one facet of the ATP3s that I found lacking. The midbass was good, well controlled an tight. But for some odd reason there was no low bass. When I tried to turning up the bass, it just got more muddy, boomy, and just plain ugly. I guess the sub is just underpowered.
I'm not a dum-bass - at least I hope not, but I was looking for speakers that were a tad more exciting than these. Something forward and in-my-face kinda thing. Perhaps it's not even possible for computer speakers.
The ATP3s aren't bad. On par, if not a bit better than the Cambridge Soundworks digital. I'll keep them. But I'll also be on the lookout for something better too.