Just a heads up for those that still own this DAC. I also had the same random popping/crackling in Windows 10, which the Windows 8 driver workaround seemed to fix. However, I started getting unresponsive YouTube videos and the Xonar control panel wouldn't allow setting changes like sampling...

Review with measurements at Audio Science Review.

The Pro 82 are worth it for the comfort alone. No other full-size headphone comes close for me, especially with my head back on my pillow. They sound good and the comfort level makes them sound even better.

Thanks, Andy. That makes sense. The only other niggling issue I have with the N3 is the inability to have separate headphone and Bluetooth volume control. I use a Bluetooth speaker regularly, but the ideal volume is 80 for the speaker and 25 for my headphones. I've set the boot volume to 25...

@CayinSupport One usability issue I have (and has been pointed out by others in this thread) is the capacitive touch zones are too large and close together resulting in accidental presses. I think the zones would function much better if there were deadzone areas between the zones. Is this...

Question: what's the lowest available frequency to modify? I've only seen 20Hz examples in this thread and I can't find anything in the immediate documentation (I only looked briefly). I'm assuming since the OS's APO is being directly modified, the adjustable range starts at >0, ≤1. Obviously...

I know this is an old topic, but it deserves to be bumped: http://sourceforge.net/projects/equalizerapo/

You sound like a strong D2000 candidate.  I have the AD900's (very similar to AD700's), HD 650's and D2000's.  Firstly, with the 650's an amp is a must.  Secondly, D2000's are far better do-it-all cans and they sound just as good, if not better, out of my Sansa Clip+ and Sansa Fuse compared to...

Put up some acoustic paneling around your computer space.  You'll see monumental gains in sound quality compared to a component upgrade.  After that I'd look into a DAC and passive attenuator for your monitors.

I always go to my D2000's for any electronica genre.  Stronger bass response and more lively than anything Sennheiser I own.

Thanks for the info, project86.  I definitely am after USB performance, so the D100 is looking like a good unit for me.   By the way, do you have any info on output impedance for the RCA outs?  I'd like to be able to use this DAC with active monitors and a passive attenuator, but passive...

Sounds like a Prelude or Forte is what you want.

You'll get way better sound out of the analogue-outs on a quality sound-card.  The DAC inside the Z5500 is poop.

Any experience with the 1704 DAC, project?  It's supposed to be Yulong's best.

Don't ever look down on anybody.

Quote: Originally Posted by CDBacklash is it just me or is anything from america in the last 20 years NOT THAT FUNNY? What people find funny usually parallels their level of intellect. That's probably your answer right there.

I saw them earlier this month when they did back-to-back nights in Calgary, Alberta. Great shows! For not being a huge Metallica fan, they definitely surprised the crap out of me. The crowd was extra raucous and the band played a great gig with tons of energy. You can tell when a band and crowed...

Quote: Originally Posted by pfillion Try Demians - Building An Empire. (Revelation of the year for me !!) MySpace.com - DEMIANS - FR - Rock / Metal / Ambient - www.myspace.com/demiansmusic Wow, that is good. Has a very strong Incubus sound to it. I like.

Quote: Originally Posted by Rednamalas1 There are many debates over which are sexiest headphones, but sexiest source is pretty clear (no pun intended): behold! Spotheim La Luce! Looks cheap and uninspired.

Hideous. Burn them.

Phone them. Talking live is 10x more effective than sending e-mails.

Quote: Originally Posted by Rednamalas1 if you don't...well, you would have to improvise, won't you? He always has the repairmen.

A Perfect Circle, Incubus.

``````2 2 + ------- ``````2 2 + ------- ``````2 2 + ------- ``````a Might be a bit easier to read that way.

I'm asking to simplify the equation. Think of the asterik signs not being there. The first part would read out as 2 + 2 / 2. Then, the second part would be 2 + 2 / 2 again, but the denominator from the first part is being used as the numerator.