Of course you’re technical, that’s why you equated a green marker pen with a black hole. You missed out your most accomplished technical qualifications: Theoretical pseudoscience, quantum snake oil and applied bull$hit! Just in case anyone ever unwittingly stumbles into this festering thread of...

Because I have nothing better to do at the moment, I found it entertaining and how better to respond to a troll? Don’t like your own medicine? G

As I just quoted your comeback, then your suggestion is that you should go back to “how to write good comebacks school”. So in addition to not being very good a peddling snake oil or BS claims, you’re also not very good at trolling. You must be very proud! lol G

Not unless you’re standing behind me, dude. What was that about looking in the mirror, dude? lol G

Oh dear, looks like you pressed the post button early, lol. And thanks for posting your quote again, proving again that you don’t understand “precision” and that your claim of being trained in physics must be false. We know already, you don’t understand and you were lying, why keep...

And peddling snake oil products and BS is yours, although you’re clearly not very good at it. To be good at it, don’t you have to convince people that your claims are not BS and your products are not snake oil? How does completely failing to convince people (effectively reaffirming that it is...

That’s the only thing I’m (mildly) curious about. Does he set out to troll and annoy people or does he set out to scam people with snake oil products and only trolls and annoys them when no one is stupid enough to take his BS claims and products seriously? This brings us right back to where we...

How can we have a “constructive discussion” (as you falsely claimed you want) if all you do is deflect from all the points put to you, how is that any sort of discussion, let alone a constructive one? And in response to your deflection, So what? 1. That’s a strawman argument, as no one stated...

Really? While I obviously didn’t expect you to address any of my points, coming from someone creative enough to invent pages of pseudoscientific drivel for a whole bunch of snake oil products, I expected more than just “you’re ranting”. Especially as you’ve already tried it once in this thread...

Not your fault, you weren’t to know that you picked a specific area of digital audio which is currently a hot marketing point for snake oil products and will therefore attract audiophile trolls with a vested interest, who pretend to be engineers or combating pseudoscience while doing the exact...

Black holes sound preposterous because of their extreme mass and the laws of physics seem to breakdown within them, so obviously they’re just like green marker pens. What a perfect analogy, well done! More proof you don’t know what science is. And, if that’s not enough, you still haven’t...

What do you mean “for whatever reasons”, how many times have you been told that pseudoscience, fallacies, cherry-picked evidence a flat out lying is not acceptable here? In fact, how would any sane adult think that would be acceptable in any science discussion forum? Yet not only do you just...

So that’s a “No” then, you don’t know what science is! Now that’s funny! Unless of course you’re lying, do know what science is and you are just trolling. Baring in mind you’re a snake oil salesman, how many guesses do you think we need? G

Of course it is! If you don’t know what “burden of proof” is and how it applies to the claimant in science, then you don’t know what science is, and why are you posting in a science discussion forum if you don’t know what science is? It’s even explained in bold on the landing page of this...

I have provided evidence to support my position, for example that I was not thinking what you claimed I was thinking and do I really need to provide evidence that a CD is put on top of a CD tray or that speakers and HPs output sound rather than light? But if you really want: “A loudspeaker...

The clue was in the title, which has got to be the understatement of the century. One audiophile can be “Totally bonkers”, so 22,198 of them “in one place” is way, way beyond “totally bonkers”! G

As ever when you make a false assertion and then ask if it’s correct, No, it is not correct! Although, it’s possibly correct that you “thought” it was a fact (even though it isn’t). You mean “help them to tell if they are lucky ones who” are human beings with human hearing? You’re not that...

Don’t you know the difference between “attack” and “refute”, between “rage bait” and “laugh” or between “science” and “snake oil”? Triple yikes! G

“Upscaling” is a technique for converting images to a higher resolution, so unless you look at images using your ears, you obviously can’t hear upscaling! I thought he only made audio products, I didn’t know he’d “newly developed an upscaling” image/video device, so I’ve nothing to say about...

You successfully “rage baited” someone by making them laugh? lol G

You have that backwards, it should read “well apparently so or we wouldn’t have this discussion here”. It’s precisely because DBT is “a lot better than the alternative” that’s it’s not allowed to be mentioned in the other forums and this is the ONLY forum where it can be discussed! What...

No, you’re not mentioned in the name of this subforum. What is mentioned is the word “science”, therefore what is hated here is pseudoscience and any other BS claims not supported by science, and by extension of course, anyone trying to promote it. How is that not obvious? What do you mean...

You mean apart from digital and analogue audio? Firstly, that’s a strawman argument as you’ve already been told twice that DBT is not necessarily perfect. Secondly, of course we believe all audiophiles are imagining things; aren’t they listening to music, aren’t they perceiving the stereo...

Good spot, I hope it’s satire too. There are some real gems in there, I particularly liked the old green marker pen mention, it’s years since that one had everyone “rolling in the aisles”. The “Dark matter white paper” was impressive too but maybe it should have been “Dark matter black paper”...

Why is it “interesting”? The only reason I can think why it might be interesting is if someone falsely believes electricity is the flow of electrons and therefore electron speed/movement is somehow relevant. If that were actually the case, then when you flipped the light switch in a DC circuit...