For larger images (1200 x 800), click individual photos
INTRODUCTION
My journey through Head-Fi has been interesting, and in my early days I was pretty naïve about what an amplifier did (wow – gotta amp everything - the increase in clarity, details, soundstage!) Over time, as I gained more knowledge, experimented and (more importantly) tested, I began to realise that those benefits I was sure I heard, had mostly come about by simply turning the volume up. And with the amps I was using, I wasn’t volume matching when comparing. Once I actually started comparing objectively, most of the time a lot of those differences disappeared. There are times when you absolutely need an amp (e.g. with the 320 ohm VE Zen and a weak source), but I’ve found it’s important to realise that an add-on amplifier has a specific purpose – to provide cleaner and more power when it’s required, or to lower the output impedance, or even to colour the sound to your liking.ABOUT VE (VENTURE ELECTRONICS)
Venture Electronics (or VE) is a 3 year old audio company based in Shenyang, Liaoning in the Peoples Republic of China. I was able to ask Lee a little about the company, and he has been very open and approachable – something I love to see when dealing with a manufacturer. It really shows a lot about a company when they show pride in their own achievements, and are so open about sharing information with their customer base.
VE is relatively small (for now) with 5 employees, and currently have a very small product line (Zen 1&2, Asura and Monk earbuds, Duke IEM and the Runabout amp I’m reviewing today). I asked Lee about their core business, and he said they were primarily an internet company, and had developed more products than were currently on offer, but for now their current product range covered enough to cater for immediate development. Their goal long term is “to have the best budget and hi-end gear”, and it was refreshing to see some frank and honest comments in reply to some of my inquiries. I’m going to quote one of Lee’s replies, because it really does add to my impression of VE as a company.
“We see our fans, not just as moving wallets. I see our budget gear (like the Monk) as a walking ad for our brand, among our on-line community (people who love earphones, because they mainly they love the ART the earphones can deliver, like gaming, movie, anime and stuff. We believe the Zen is the best earbud in the world, and as we can sell the monk for cheap then it might go viral and get more attention to the other products. We believe to be the best hi-fi company, we need to have the best of the best gears, not only budget ones. If we only do budget, people will have a false image of us not being serious enough, so the idea is very simple”
And to close, I asked Lee about VE’s mission statement or values statement, and the answer I received made perfect sense – “keeping it real”.
DISCLAIMER
The Runabout portable amplifier that I’m reviewing today was provided as a review sample by VE. Lee actually supplied it because he was interested in my opinion as to how it performed, and I wasn’t obligated to actually write a review – but I wanted to because it is a very interesting amplifier. I am not affiliated to VE in any way, and this is my honest opinion of the Runabout amplifier.
PREAMBLE - 'ABOUT ME'.
(This is to give any readers a baseline for interpreting the review).
I'm a 48 year old music lover. I don't say audiophile – I just love my music. Over the last couple of years, I have slowly changed from cheaper listening set-ups to my current set-up. I vary my listening from portables (Fiio X5ii, X3ii, LP5 and iPhone 5S) to my desk-top's set-up (PC > USB > iFi iDSD). I also use a portable set-up at work – either X5ii/X3ii > HP, or PC > E17K > HP. My main full sized headphones at the time of writing are the Beyer T1, Sennheiser HD600, and AKG K553. Most of my portable listening is done with IEMs, and lately it has mainly been with the Adel U6, Dunu DN-2000J, Jays q-Jays and Alclair Curve2. A full list of the gear I have owned (past and present is listed in my Head-Fi profile).
I have very eclectic music tastes listening to a variety from classical/opera and jazz, to grunge and general rock. I listen to a lot of blues, jazz, folk music, classic rock, indie and alternative rock. I am particularly fond of female vocals. I generally tend toward cans that are relatively neutral/balanced, but I do have a fondness for clarity, and suspect I might have slight ‘treble-head’ preferences. I am not treble sensitive (at all), and in the past have really enjoyed headphones like the K701, SR325i, and of course the T1 and DT880.
I have extensively tested myself (abx) and I find aac256 or higher to be completely transparent. I do use exclusively redbook 16/44.1 if space is not an issue. All of my music is legally purchased (mostly CD – the rest FLAC purchased on-line).
I tend to be sceptical about audiophile ‘claims’, don’t generally believe in burn-in, have never heard a difference with different cables, and would rather test myself blind on perceived differences. I am not a ‘golden eared listener’. I suffer from mild tinnitus, and at 48, my hearing is less than perfect.
I have very eclectic music tastes listening to a variety from classical/opera and jazz, to grunge and general rock. I listen to a lot of blues, jazz, folk music, classic rock, indie and alternative rock. I am particularly fond of female vocals. I generally tend toward cans that are relatively neutral/balanced, but I do have a fondness for clarity, and suspect I might have slight ‘treble-head’ preferences. I am not treble sensitive (at all), and in the past have really enjoyed headphones like the K701, SR325i, and of course the T1 and DT880.
I have extensively tested myself (abx) and I find aac256 or higher to be completely transparent. I do use exclusively redbook 16/44.1 if space is not an issue. All of my music is legally purchased (mostly CD – the rest FLAC purchased on-line).
I tend to be sceptical about audiophile ‘claims’, don’t generally believe in burn-in, have never heard a difference with different cables, and would rather test myself blind on perceived differences. I am not a ‘golden eared listener’. I suffer from mild tinnitus, and at 48, my hearing is less than perfect.
This is a purely subjective review - my gear, my ears, and my experience. Please take it all with a grain of salt - especially if it does not match your own experience.
FURTHER NOTES
- Volume matching was done with a calibrated SPL meter and test tones (1 kHz) when required for comparison.
- Frequency response and distortion measurements were taken using a relatively cheap Startech USB soundcard (which measures pretty well – 0.012% THD and 0.024% THD+N – which was consistent at 300 Hz, 1 kHz and 6 kHz @ -3 dB volume as suggested by ARTA using loopback). I combined this with a licensed copy of the ARTA measuring suite. The soundcard has a calibration adjustment applied – so that it measures dead flat from 20 Hz to 20 kHz.
WHAT I LOOK FOR (NOW) IN A PORTABLE AMP
I thought I’d list (before I start with the review) what I would now look for in a portable amplifier. This is useful to remember when looking at my reasoning for scoring later in the review.
- Genuine portability
- Good battery life
- Clean, neutral signature (a window to the music)
- Easy to use
- Low output impedance
- Reasonable output power – should be able to drive IEMs and earphones up to 300 ohms
- Good gain control
- Value for money
PORTABLE AMPS I’VE OWNED IN THE PAST
- Fiio E7, E11, GoVibe Porta Tube, Headstage Arrow 12HE 4G, Beyerdynamic A200p
- Current portable amps E11K, E17K, Q1, VE Runabout
THE REVIEW
PACKAGING AND ACCESSORIESAs an evaluation sample, the Runabout arrived to me basically in courier packaging without any accessories (it was extremely well wrapped and protected). I’m unaware at this stage if there is actually likely to be any retail packaging. There is no power adaptor, battery, or interconnect.
As an evaluation sample – I have no issues with the spartan approach – but would hope that for actual buyers the minimum they will receive would be a power adaptor and basic interconnect.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
The tables below list most of the relevant specifications for the Runabout. I have included specifications for Fiios E11K and E17K as comparison points – but please consider with the E17K that you also get a DAC too. This is just to compare similarly priced amps.
| VE Runabout | Fiio E11K | Fiio E17K |
Approx cost | ~ USD 98 | ~ USD 60 | ~ USD 140 |
Dimensions | 110 x 70 x 25mm | 91 x 56 x 13mm | 104 x 62 x 13mm |
Weight | 234g | 92g | 110g |
Output Impedance H/O | Not stated / unknown | <0.2 ohm | <1.1 ohm |
Max Output @ 16 ohm | Not stated / unknown | 450 mW | Not stated |
Max Output @ 32 ohm | 150 mW | 270 mW | >200 mW |
SNR | Not stated / unknown | >108 dB | >113 dB |
THD+N | Not stated (see review) | 0.004% (1 kHz) | <0.003% (1 kHZ) |
Frequency Response | 20 Hz-20 kHz | 20 Hz-20 kHz | 20 Hz-20 kHz |
Gain | ~ +4.5 db (H) | -3.8 dB (L) / 11.7 dB (H) | 0 / 6 / 12 dB |
Channel Imbalance | ~ 0.5 dB (measured) | <0.3 dB | <0.5 dB |
Max Output Current | Not stated / unknown | >92.6 mA | >115 mA |
Max Output Voltage | Not stated / unknown | >8.67 Vp-p | >7.8 Vp-p |
Outer Material | Brushed Aluminium | Brushed Aluminium | Brushed Aluminium |
Headphone Out | 3.5 mm | 3.5 mm | 3.5 mm |
Battery | 9V replaceable | 1400 mAh rechargeable | 1500 mAh rechargeable |
Battery Life | Refer to review (30 hour+) | ~ 16 hours | ~ 15 hours |
Recharge Time | NA | 4 hours | 4 hours |
BUILD / DESIGN
The Runabout is rectangular shaped with rounded edges over the main body, flat face and rear plates which are also rounded, but still create a hard edge between the body and face plate. It is fairly large for a portable amp – measuring 110 x 70 x 25mm – so it is essentially as long and wide as my iPhone 5S, and twice as deep. The runabout is also relatively weighty, coming in at 234g with battery loaded (close to 3 x the weight of the E11K, and twice the weight of the E17K.
At the front from left to right is a BITechnologies potentiometer, 3.5mm headphone out, switchable L/H gain, 3.5mm line-in, and a green LED (power on). At the rear of the amp is a 15v DC power socket, an on/off switch, and another red LED light (assume this is lit when DC power is active?). The battery can be accessed by undoing 4 threaded screws, and removing the rear plate. A 9V battery is used, and sits snugly between the frame and the PCB. Screwing the rear plate back on securely holds the battery in place.
The pot is nice and smooth to use and has a full range of motion from about the 7 o’clock position through to 5 o’clock. Channel balance is pretty good on the RA – showing approx. 0.5 dB imbalance when measured (at close to full output), and subjectively showing noticeable imbalance at the bottom of the pot, but nothing really noticeable beyond that.
Opening the unit up, and I was quite surprised to see that the outer mail case is actually two pieces – something not at all noticeable when assembled. The PCB is extremely tidy and well soldered. The OP amps are socketed JRC 4556AD (so can be user replaced), and combined with a Texas Instruments BUF634 250mA high speed buffer chip.
The only issue I have with build (besides weight and size which I will address later) is that the rear thumb screws are quite difficult to remove, and already I have one which is slightly cross threaded. Given how often it is likely (within the Runabout’s lifetime) an owner would be replacing the battery, I think that perhaps a more elegant solution could be needed.
Overall though, the build is tidy, solid, and shows very good workmanship.
HEAT AND POWER
So far I’ve noticed no heat build-up at all with the Runabout. Even after a couple of hours (driving my HD600s), it’s still very cool to touch.
VE doesn’t give a lot of detail about power output, but they do list 150 mW into 32 ohms and 55 mW into 300 ohms. Surprisingly, compared to my E11K and E17K, the Runabout outputs 55% of the rated power of the E11K, and 75% of the E17K. I guess I was expecting more given its size and weight.
But to give you an idea of the output the Runabout is capable of, my HD600’s were at a comfortable listening level at around 9 o’clock on the pot (only 25% of the available power), and subjectively sounded really well driven. VE’s own 320ohm Zen(1) was easily driven at just under 9 0’clock on the pot. Lastly I also switched to the Beyerdynamic T1 (600 ohm), and while it required close to 11 o’clock on the pot, this still left ample headroom (again low gain). My only issue with the T1 was that it sounded (subjectively) just a little thin (the E11K was similar).
The Runabout is quite a powerhouse for a sub $100 amp – but how about those wanting to drive more sensitive loads?
First up for me was the 22 ohm 115 dB SPL Adel U6, and it was beautifully driven – but at 8am and in real danger of hitting audible channel imbalance. The 8ohm 102 dB SPL DUNU DN-2000J was at very close to the same volume. Of course all of this depends on the line-out of the source you are using – and the Fiios tend to have an excellent and well powered line-out. Feeding from a lower powered source (e.g. a smart-phone) will net far better use of the pot.
So summarising – the Runabout is a powerful little amplifier for its size. It’ll easily drive most headphones at least up to 300 ohms (depending on sensitivity), and likely many up to 600 ohms. Depending on the line-out of your source, you may not have a lot of play in the pot for more sensitive loads.
GAIN
The gain switch on the Runabout is a simple high/low switch, and while VE state the difference as 3.4 times on low, and 5.7 times on high, it is perhaps more practical to look at the actual use and impact. Measuring with a loopback and ARTA, the actual gain by engaging the switch was ~ 4.6 dB. So what does this mean? Well if put another way, the difference between high and low gain is roughly the difference between 8 o’clock and 9 o’clock on the pot. So the question to really ask is why so low and what is the point? Gain isn’t a magic switch to make things sound better (despite what some others may think) – all it is really doing is adding volume. And to add so little volume to me just doesn’t seem to make a lot of sense.

Image above shows the gain measurement on the Runabout
I made this comment when I recently reviewed Fiio’s E11K, and it is appropriate here:
“There is also a gain switch which raises the overall volume by ~ 15.5 dB. The thing I like about this is that it a decent change in gain, and actually makes a difference – rather than just being put there as an afterthought. Unsurprisingly, I really don’t use the gain toggle at all – unless it’s a low powered source, and a hard to drive load. Nice to know it is there though.”
In the case of the Runabout, the gain switch needs more thought re implementation, and at this stage is effectively useless for most loads.
BATTERY LIFE
As stated earlier, the Runabout uses a 9v battery, and I haven’t been able to actually perform a single proper test with it yet to actually measure performance. The problem for me (with work, family and other commitments) is simply being able to be present for when the battery cuts out. In one of my tests I started the Runabout on continuous play, rechecked after 24 hours and it was still going strong. At the 30 hour mark it was still playing, but then unfortunately I forgot to check again until around the 48-50 hour mark, and at that stage the battery was exhausted. What I will say is that a single 9v replaceable battery should get you at least a week of reasonable use 4-5 hours a day, and it’s a simple matter of having access to a spare – and you are instantly up and running again.
Update: Lee has already been in touch following the posting of the review, and gave me some great insight as to why he's used the 9V battery. The reason for choosing this options was to ensure a clean and black background - with no dc to dc voltage boost, so that ultimately SQ could be maintained. You've just got to love a company that goes to these sorts or measures.
SONICS AND PERFORMANCE
I’m going to preface this section with a little critique I received a while ago (by PM), and my answer to it – so that you can understand why I don’t comment on some things, and why I do comment on others. I was told my review on another amp was poor because I didn’t include sections on bass, mid-range, treble, sound-stage, imaging etc – yet referred to an amp as warm, full, or lean.
Now I can understand the reference to warm / full / lean – as they are very subjective terms, and whilst I’d like to avoid their use, they are invaluable to convey true meaning. Comparing my NFB-12 to the Aune X1S for example – the Audio-gd does sound richer and warmer. It’s the nature of the DAC which is used.
But I choose not to comment on bass, mids, treble, and most definitely not sound-stage – simply because when we are talking about an amp – they shouldn’t be discussed. An amp’s job is to amplify the signal with as low distortion as possible, and output as linear signal as possible. If it is doing its job properly, there is no effect on bass, mids, or treble. And IME an amp does not affect soundstage (unless there is DSP or crossfeed in play) – that is solely the realm of the transducers and the actual recording.
So we have that out of the way how does the Runabout perform sonically?

Image above shows linearity and channel balance
The first thing I did was to check the linearity of the Runabout. To do this I used a calibrated sound card (calibrated to measure completely flat), ARTA and a loopback. In both the low gain and high gain frequency tests the Runabout measured completely linear. So what you are getting is very good neutral amplification not adding or taking away anything. And that is what we all want right?
Next up was distortion measurements. My USB soundcard measures (on loopback) THD at 0.010%-0.013% and THD+N at 0.020%-0.032% at pretty much -100 dB (this was with separate readings at 300 Hz, 1 kHz and 6 kHz). When I added the Runabout – I got pretty much the same measurements with it in loopback – so the Runabout is essentially measuring the same or lower than my USB sound card can measure. It also means that the distortion and harmonic distortion are both inaudible.
The last thing I measured was IMD, and again this was below the threshold of audibility, and again the Runabout was measuring below the actual thresh-hold of the USB sound card.
So what does this tell us? Simply that the Runabout supplies very linear, and very clean output. Purely subjectively, it sounds very neutral – no added warmth or brightness I can discern. Just pure, clean amplification – basically a window to the music.
COMPARISONS
Because I don’t have a lot of other portable amplifiers at my disposal, I simply used what I had available – the Fiio E11K, and the Fiio E17K (which as luck would have it bracket the Runabout in price).
![]() | ![]() | [size=inherit]![]() |
E17K, Runabout and E11K | Top to bottom - E11K, E17K and Runabout | Stacking size - X3ii (top), X5ii and Rounabout |
VE Runabout (USD $98) vs E11K (USD $60)
Both of these amplifiers are designed to be portable, both are extremely well built with aluminium casings, both have an analogue volume pot, and both measure very linearly with low distortion. Purely subjectively - volume matched and fast (or slow) switched, they both sound very similar – so much so that I would be unable to tell them apart in a blind test. Both are excellent amplifiers in this regard. For those who want to know – I could discern no difference in sound-stage

The E11K is around twice as powerful according to the power specifications – but this would only come into play with very demanding loads, and for most portable uses that would be a non-issue. The E11K does come with a subtle bass boost as an extra feature, and the other feature difference is that the gain on the E11K at 15.5 dB is a lot more practical than the Runabout’s 4.5 dB gain.
The Runabout and E11K approach battery life from two very different angles – the E11K with a fixed rechargeable battery providing around 16 hours life with a 4 hour charge time vs the Runabout’s whopping 30+ hours and instant swap. So this comes down to how you use the amps and what your preference would be. For me personally I much prefer the ability to charge from any USB port, or wall socket, and the gains in cost and smaller size outweigh the added life. YMMV. Personally I would have liked to see the Runabout with smaller form factor and a rechargeable battery – but that is simply my preference.
Finally there is the question of value. And unfortunately for the Runabout it is up against a portable amplifier that is cheaper, more powerful, just as linear, with better implemented features, and a lot more portable. Both are fantastic amplifiers for their price. The E11K is simply better IMHO.
VE Runabout (USD $98) vs E17K (USD $130)
The E17K is a DAC/amp. It has an inbuilt battery (15 hour rating) and digital volume control instead of analog. At 110g and 104x62x13mm, it is again smaller (by approximately half) than the Runabout. It has 3 levels of gain 0dB, 6dB and 12dB, and has a tone toggle (-10 to +10 bass, and same on the treble). Again it measures below the distortion floor of my sound-card, and measures flat in frequency. Its maximum output is 200mw into 32 ohms (slightly more than the Runabout) and again has no issues driving my 300 ohm Sennheiser HD600s. In a volume matched blind-test, I would have difficulty picking the E17K from the Runabout (the E17K may have a slight touch of warmth). The E17K does however add a very good DAC, tone controls, balance, and other inputs and outputs, and is incredible value at $130.
On the amp section alone, the Runabout sounds every bit as good as the E17K and is definitely 25-30% cheaper. But even discounting the DAC of the E17K, it offers useable tone controls, far better gain implementation and most importantly better portability. So it would be hard (again) to recommend the Runabout if put up against the E17K – even at a slightly dearer price.
RUNABOUT - VALUE & CONCLUSION
The VE Runabout is an exceptional sounding amplifier with a very neutral sound signature, very low distortion, and essentially provides a clean and clear window to the music. It is quite powerful for its size, and had no problem driving my HD600s with a lot of headroom to spare. Its build is very solid, and internally a lot of care has been taken with layout of components.At $100 it represents very good value to the audio enthusiast. Five or six years ago, if the Runabout had hit the market with this form factor, it would have been a hit – especially at this price point. However, in today’s market, and against current competition, it is going to struggle a little. With its current weight and dimension it is far less portable when compared to both the E11K and E17K (which both have comparable sound). It also has issues with gain implementation (not really useful), and comparative lack of features.
I’ve now had the Runabout for a little over 3 months, and while it is an excellent sounding and performing amplifier, I must confess that I don’t reach for it – even around home where portability is less important.
So for me, a solid first effort from VE, and very worthy of 3 stars for what it brings to the table. But ultimately there is better value out there, and as such I would simply suggest looking at the features you need, and basing buying decisions on that.
ADDENDUM
For anyone reading the above – please understand that this is not a negative review. I really like the Runabout’s sound and would be perfectly happy with it listening in isolation. However as a reviewer, I must also look at the competition when evaluating, as that will ultimately perceived value.
Thanks once again to Lee from VE for providing the sample for evaluation.
Lee and I conversed within less than an hour of posting the review, and he was able to update me on one of the design choices - ie the battery (I mentioned the reasons why they used it in the body of the review). With this in mind, and realising now why they've chosen it, and also the impact it has on overall size constraints, I can now relay this to readers of the review so they also understand VE's intentions. Lee also says they will be including an interconnect when they eventually release the amp for global sale.
Taking both of these factors into account has changed my overall view a little - and accordingly I have raised the score to 3.5 stars.
RECOMMENDATIONS TO VE
There are some cosmetic, and also alternative suggestions:
- As a portable amp – consider switching to a rechargeable lithium battery, and condensing the overall size for future models.
- The gain implementation really needs to be rethought.
- If keeping current form factor and price – then inclusion of a power adaptor and interconnect would be useful to add to value perception.
- With the current size shell / form factor – there would be plenty of room to add a small DAC board. This would make it ideal for use as a cheap and excellent sounding mini desktop dac/amp. Food for thought maybe?
I'd really keep an eye on these guys in the future. The know design, they no good sound, and they are unexpectedly frank and clear with the information they release. They are also very open to suggestions. Sign of a really good company.