INTRODUCTION
I’ve been lucky on my Head-Fi journey to meet and converse with some wonderful people who share my passion for the hobby. Among this group is a chap you all know as d marc0, and recently he asked me if I’d like to participate in a tour involving the new Noble Savant – a universal multi-BA IEM which Noble has released recently. Having never heard any of Noble’s offerings, but knowing that they have a wonderful rep on the forums for their customs (especially the TOTL K10), I immediately said yes, and have been looking forward to their arrival. So 10 days ago, I received the Savants, and since then I’ve been putting them through their paces as much as I’ve been able to.For those who don’t know anything about Noble, I PM’d Dr. John Moulton, and he graciously supplied me with a little bit of information, which I’d like to share with you. John (AKA Wizard) is a qualified Audiologist, and originally practiced in the US for several years (also owning his own hearing aid company). He then moved to Thailand (working for another hearing aid company), and while he was there, he further honed his skills, and learnt all he could about CIEMs, circuitry etc, and began building rapport with suppliers. He also built a product line, wrote some website content, and essentially had all but established a new company ready to start. At that stage he met Brannan Mason, and the two became friends.
After launching a CIEM company, Brannan joined with John and help to distribute products and also assisted in sourcing supplies. After about two years it became apparent to John that he needed to strike out on his own, and so he and Brannan formed Noble. In a relatively short time, they have built a formidable product line which is recognised throughout the audio community as having very high quality sound, and (in the custom line) incredibly unique and striking designs.
Their latest release is the Noble Savant, and this is the universal model I will be reviewing. The model I have is the entry level Savant Universal, priced at USD 599.00.
DISCLAIMER
I was provided the Noble Savant as part of a mini-tour organised by d Marc0. I’ve now had the Savant for approximately 10 days, and I’d estimate I’ve probably spent around 40 hours listening time with the Savant before I started writing this review.
I am not associated with Noble in any way, I am receiving no form of compensation for this review, and this is my subjective opinion of the Noble Savant. At the conclusion of the review, they will be sent to the next person on the tour.
PREAMBLE - 'ABOUT ME'. (or a base-line for interpreting my thoughts and bias)
I'm a 48 year old music lover. I don't say audiophile – I just love my music. Over the last couple of years, I have slowly changed from cheaper listening set-ups to my current set-up. I vary my listening from portables (Fiio X5ii, X3ii, LP5 and iPhone 5S) to my desk-top's set-up (PC > USB > iFi iDSD). I also use a portable set-up at work – either X5ii/X3ii > HP, or PC > E17K > HP. My main full sized headphones at the time of writing are the Beyer T1, Sennheiser HD600, and AKG K553. Most of my portable listening is done with IEMs - and at the moment it has mainly been with the Dunu DN-2000J, Trinity Delta, and Dunu Titan. A full list of the gear I have owned (past and present is listed in my Head-Fi profile).
I have very eclectic music tastes listening to a variety from classical/opera and jazz, to grunge and general rock. I listen to a lot of blues, jazz, folk music, classic rock, indie and alternative rock. I am particularly fond of female vocals. I generally tend toward cans that are relatively neutral/balanced, but I do have a fondness for clarity, and suspect I might have slight ‘treble-head’ preferences. I am not treble sensitive (at all), and in the past have really enjoyed headphones like the K701, SR325i, and of course the T1 and DT880.
I have extensively tested myself (abx) and I find aac256 or higher to be completely transparent. I do use exclusively redbook 16/44.1 if space is not an issue. All of my music is legally purchased (mostly CD – the rest FLAC purchased on-line).
I tend to be sceptical about audiophile ‘claims’, don’t generally believe in burn-in, have never heard a difference with different cables, and would rather test myself blind on perceived differences. I am not a ‘golden eared listener’. I suffer from mild tinnitus, and at 48, my hearing is less than perfect.
Over the time I’ve had them – I’ve used the Noble Savant from a variety of sources, but for this review, I’ve mainly used it with the iDSD (home), and straight from the headphone-out socket of my Fiio X5ii and also my iPhone 5S. Although I have tested them with an amplifier (E17K, E11K, and of course the iDSD), I do not think they benefit from additional amplification (at least I have noticed no remarkable improvements). In the time I have spent with the Savant, I have noticed no change in the overall sonic presentation – but I have noticed my own impression of them change (brain burn in).
This is a purely subjective review - my gear, my ears, and my experience. Please take it all with a grain of salt - especially if it does not match your own experience.
THE REVIEW
Point to ponder ….. why “Savant”? The literal meaning is ‘learned, scholarly, wise’. Perhaps it could also be extrapolated to refined and cultured?PACKAGING AND ACCESSORIES
The Nobel Savant arrived in a plain outer box, simply printed with the word Noble and the Noble logo printed centrally on the top cover, and the model and serial number (216) in the top left. Opening the outer box revealed John’s “Wizard” signature on the inside front panel, and the Noble printed sleeve (which reminds me very much of the HD600’s marbling), over a simple but rugged Pelican case. Also included in the box are two Noble logo stickers.
Opening the Pelican case reveals the Savant, and accessories, all nicely packaged in clear snap lock bags, and also two Noble branded bands (for either securing your case, or could be used strapping n amplifier to your DAP of choice).
The case itself is beautifully lined with soft foam inside – perfect for transport. But at 135 x 95 x 40mm, it’s not exactly pocket friendly. Whilst I have many of my own portable carrying cases, I do think it is one area which Noble missed – a smaller portable carry case (even if it was just a soft leather zip case) for day to day carrying. Something to think about for the future perhaps?
EDIT : I see other review samples include a soft drawstring pouch – so looks like Noble have already solved this one J. There was unfortunately no pouch with this tour unit.
The rest of the accessories are generous and include:
- Two Noble stickers
- Two Noble black bands
- A very nice Noble ownership card
- A cleaning brush
- 3 sets (L, M, S) foam tips
- 3 sets (L, M, S) dual flange tips
- 3 sets (L, M, S) silicone hybrid tips
- 3 sets (L, M, S) silicone hybrid tips (different style / bore)
Perhaps the only other thing I would have included would be a 3.5-6.3mm adaptor, and maybe an airline adaptor as well. I know on my recent trip around the world, the airline adaptor I had was invaluable.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
(From website + information from John)
Type | Multi BA Universal Fit Inner Ear Monitor |
Drivers | Multi BA – number unknown |
Frequency Range | Not stated |
Impedance | < 30 ohm |
Sensitivity | Not stated |
Jack | 3.5mm gold plated, straight jack |
Cable | 1.25m twisted pair spc tinsel cable |
Weight | Approx 15g (including tips and cable) |
IEM Shell | ABS moulded plastic |
Passive isolation | Not stated – but very good |
I did ask John directly about the number of drivers, but whilst he was happy to disclose that the drivers are indeed BA, he was not forthcoming with the number / configuration. It makes a good mystery / talking point. My personal thoughts on this are in the final summary.
FREQUENCY GRAPH
I asked John about graphs for the Savant, and it is Noble’s policy not to disclose, or comment on any graphs. As part of my reviewing, I like to get as much objective data as I can, so I used my trusty calibrated SPL meter, and a series of fixed test tones, to plot out a rough frequency graph so I could relate what I’m hearing to the graph, and also do the same when making comparisons to other IEMs (later in the review).
EDIT : 6 Sept
I've removed the original measurements and graphs. I was never happy with them, as they did not match what I was hearing. The sub-bass is a bit rolled off, but not to the extent of my original measurements, and I suspect my coupler was faulty. The new measurements were taken with the Veritas system. I took 2 series of 5 measurements (through the ARTA software). New graph is below.

What I’m subjectively hearing is an extremely clear and vivid mid-range, with good rendering of detail, and relatively subdued low end with a bit of roll-off in the sub-bass. The mid-range has the most focus, but (for me anyway) there is enough mid-bass to feel that the overall signature lacks very little (only really the very low bass is subdued). People who enjoy a bassier signature may not likely feel fulfilled with the Savant.
BUILD QUALITY / DESIGN / MICROPHONICS
The overall build quality of the Savant is excellent. John and his team at Noble really know what they’re doing with their IEM shells.
The Savant shell is moulded from two pieces of ABS plastic, the main body, and a rear face plate. The two pieces are joined by rose gold miniature screws. The entire unit is very smooth, with no rough edges, and the only visible seam is between the main body and rear plate. As this is a multi-BA IEM, there is no sign of porting (not required).
The body measures 21mm in length and 16mm wide at its maximum points. The body is approximately 11mm deep. The nozzle protrudes approximately 7-8mm from the main body, and has dual bores. All of these measured elements flow into one another for a seamless design, which looks, and is, both super comfortable, and very sturdy.
The cable connectors are a standard dual pin, and very tight fitting. They require some effort to remove, so I doubt any owners will have issues with loose cables any time soon.
![]() | ![]() | [size=inherit]![]() |
The Wizard signature | Beautiful moulding makes fitting a breeze | The standard 2 pin connector |
The cable itself is approximately 1.25m long (from jack relief to moulded ear wire), is a twisted pair, and according to John consists of SPC tinsel with a proprietary sheathing material. It has a tested pull strength of 150lb, and like the rest of the Savant, is both robust and practical. The cable is very flexible, has no memory (except at the formable earhooks), and most people will really love it. At the IEM junction (from the 2 pin plug), there is a 4cm length of mouldable wire which can be shaped as an earhook. This is both a brilliant length, and very sturdy. The Y split is a simple affair – just a piece of clear shrunk plastic. Above it is another clear plastic tube – which slides to become a neck cinch. This works surprisingly well – simple and practical. The jack is straight, quite small, 3.5mm gold plated, and has good strain relief.
![]() | ![]() | [size=inherit]![]() |
The cable is very strong and flexible | 3.5mm straight jack | Y split and chin cinch |
Overall, both the build and design is wonderful ……. except for two very small issues I have with the cable. My first is microphonics – the cable has quite a lot. They disappear to an acceptable level when the cinch is used and the cable is tucked inside clothing – but it’s there and it’s noticeable (depending on the clothing I’m wearing). If you’re wearing ribbed clothing or zips, the microphonics can become audible. The second issue is with the mouldable ear hooks. I wear glasses, and there is audible transmission of noise whenever the glasses come into contact with the outer covering of the hooks. Both issues can be minimised, and at least if I was buying the Savant, I could easily swap the default cable out to something with a slightly more clothing/glasses friendly outer sheath.
FIT / COMFORT / ISOLATION
For my physiology, the actual shell of the Savant is perfect. It exactly fits my ears, and the outer face plate (once fitted) does not protrude at all past my outer ear. The Savant is probably one of the most comfortable IEMs I’ve ever worn, and they simply disappear once I have the fit adjusted completely. I have no issues with sleeping, or lying on my side with them.
As I’ve said many times in my other reviews, I have one ear canal slightly different to the other one (my right is very slightly smaller) - so I tend to find that usually single silicon flanges don't fit overly well. I have a selection of tips I try with every earphone I test, and rarely do I find an earphone where I get perfect sealing with most silicone tips – until now. Again, I’m not sure if it is the design perfectly meshing with my personal physiology – but I was able to get dual flange, single flange, Spinfits, SpiralDots, and even Ostry black and blue tips all fitting perfectly. I had no Comply 500s – but I had some 400S sports tips, and was able to (eventually) jam them on – and they ultimately were my preference – but this would be the first time so many tips have fit naturally with my ears and given me such a good seal (and amazing comfort). The only tips that refused to fit were my Sony Isolation tips (wouldn’t fit the nozzle).
Isolation is really good, and I’d have no issues at all using these on a flight. The universal fit for me would be very close (or perhaps better) than the Shure SE series. Quite an achievement. There was also no issue for me with excessive vacuum or pressure.
SOUND QUALITY
The following is what I hear from the Noble Savant. YMMV – and probably will – as my tastes are likely different to yours (read the preamble I gave earlier for a baseline). Most of the testing at this point (unless otherwise stated) was done with my Fiio X5ii as source, and Comply S400 tips.
Tracks used were across a variety of genres – and can be viewed in this list http://www.head-fi.org/a/brookos-test-tracks.
Thoughts on Default Signature
I fell in love with default signature of the Savant from first listen – it’s almost like it was designed for my particular tastes. The mid-range is very clear, very clean (and quick), and very vivid. In many ways it reminds me of my old B2, or maybe even a more vivid Shure SE425, but with a far better tuned upper end. With both of those earphones, the mid-range was exquisite, but the bass rolled off early, and that is kind of what I’m hearing a bit with the Savant.
Saying that though, the bass that is there is clear, fast, and doesn’t feel excessively weak, or anaemic to me. There is enough mid-bass thump to be interesting, but the lower bass rumble is definitely toned down.
Overall Detail / Clarity
As usual, I started with my standard go-to tracks (“Gaucho” and “Sultans of Swing”), and the immediate impression with both tracks is one of clarity, very good instrument separation, and good portrayal of underlying detail. The bass guitar is there in the background, and seems nicely balanced with the vocals and other instruments. Cymbals are coming through clearly with nice shimmer and decay. Saxophone is gorgeously vivid on Gaucho, and Knopfler’s lead guitar in Sultans has impressive crunch. There is nothing I would change with either track – just a very enjoyable and vivid listening experience.
Sound-stage & Imaging
The Noble Savant (to me) don’t have a huge width or depth of stage – even with the binaural track “Tundra” – but then again most IEM’s struggle to get out of head. The Savant do go slightly out of head (a feat in itself), but where they excel is in the extremely precise imaging, and to me this is often far more important. The staging with this track is definitely circumaural and, because it’s not too expansive, is utterly believable.
McKennitt’s “Dante’s Prayer” is up next, and the Savants are wonderful with this track. Stage size is once again intimate – Loreena is quite close, but the piano and cello are both playing a little further back. Again more importantly the overall imaging is again stunning – I can picture where everything is playing. The overall tonality is also very good, and I’m loving the way Loreena’s vocals are presented by the Savant. The applause at the end of this track can sometime involve the listener when the earphones manage to convey a connection via soundstaging and imaging (it’s why I use this track so much). With the Savant, I’m not right there in the crowd, but the applause is believable and the track overall was immensely enjoyable.
My last test was with Amanda Marshall’s “Let It Rain” and this presentation is brilliantly vivid with the Savant. This track does tend to be slightly holographic in overall presentation, and the Savant did capture this rather well – an intimate overall presentation, but flowing around me. Once again – the vocals were sublime.
Bass Quality and Quantity
Already, before I’d started critical listening, one of my questions was going to be how low the Savant could go with more bass focussed tracks. So my first test was Mark Lanegan’s “Bleeding Muddy Waters”. It is a track that exposes any sign of muddiness or bass bleed very quickly. The bass response of the Savant was really good on overall quality – quick, and accurate. Mark’s vocals had great clarity, and decent texture, but some of the visceral slam I usually get with this track was missing. It was still enjoyable, but I know how it should sound – and the Savant wasn't quite able to portray everything I know is there in the track.
Next up was my sub-bass test, so I switched to Lorde’s “Royals”. This time it was more noticeable – the sub-bass was barely there, and on this track, it should be rumbling. There is some mid-bass thump, and again Ella’s vocal presentation is gorgeous. But most lovers of this type of music will be looking for the low bass, and the Savant is not delivering.
I also tried some Trance with AVB, and also Amy Winehouse’s “You Know I’m No Good”. Both had very vivid and clear vocal presentations, and to be fair to the Savant, the mid-bass has enough thump to be very enjoyable, but there is no doubt that there is some low end missing. Bass lovers may not be fully satisfied with the Savant.
Female Vocals
Anyone who follows my reviews will know that around 60-65% of my music is made up of female artists. So the presentation of female vocals is very important to me. The Savant had struggled a little with bass presentation, but everything I’d heard so far indicated it was going to excel with female vocalists. This was part of the critical review I had been looking forward to.
My first test is always Agnes Obel’s “Aventine” which tends to expose if the upper mid-range is too laid back, or again if overly forward. With the Savant, Obel’s vocal presentation was magical, gorgeous, everything I could want in an IEM. Very smooth, very euphonic – my only qualm would be that when the cello kicks in, it’s just a little soft (doesn’t have the depth I know is there).
London Grammar was next and I could have listened to the whole album track after track. Hannah’s voice was clear, clean, and wonderfully balanced. In fact flicking from track to track, every single female artist was utterly brilliantly portrayed with the Savant. For my personal tastes, I haven’t heard a better IEM (to date) with female vocalists (ie vocal presentation only). Even Feist and FaTM had enough mid-bass impact to maintain dynamics, but both could have used just a little more oomph in the low end.
Gabriella Cilmi’s “Safer” gave me the usual goose-bumps, Norah was stunning (another one I could have listened to for hours), and as I stated earlier, the Savant just kept hitting home runs with all my female vocalists, track after track.
Male Vocals
I next switched to Rock music – mainly to test male vocals. For the most part I found the Savant very enjoyable. Yes, some of the bass impact was a little polite (but that’s what EQ is for right?). The clarity through the mid-range continued to be hugely enjoyable. Guitars had crunch. Micro details were there in all of their glory. Acoustic music in particular shone – and especially some of my classic rock (Hotel California was sublime). But at the other end of the spectrum, vocal centric rock ballads were also brilliant with the Savant – especially Alter Bridge’s “Broken Wings”, and Seether’s acoustic cover of Pearl Jam’s “Immortality”.
My litmus test (as always though) is Pearl Jam. Amazing detail, good texture in Eddie’s voice, but possibly didn’t have the overall depth in his vocal range. I guess you can’t have everything when female vocals are handled so well. Still a good presentation – just not the best I’ve heard.
Genre Specific Notes
My next task was to put the Savant though some other genre options.
First up was a little Alt Rock, starting with Floyd’s classic “Money”, and continuing through to Porcupine Tree’s “Trains”. Both were really good, amazingly so. One of the things my own particular Alt. Rock preferences require is absolute clarity for the sheer variety and number of transitions with different instruments. Both tracks had plenty of dynamics, and the Savant made both tracks a joy to listen to. Wilsons voice in particular seemed to fit with the Savant really well.
For Jazz and Blues, once again the clarity and imaging was a potent combination. Portico Quartet’s “Ruins” was ethereal, and in particular the presentation of cymbals and sax was captivating. I also switched to “Steepless”, and Cornelias vocals in combination with PQ’s Jazz Fusion style was simply magic. Miles was toe tappingly engaging, and “So What” had me closing my eyes with a smile on my face.
Moving to Blues and for the first time I found the Savant a little too hot. I tried Beth Hart’s “Live at Paradiso” album (it’s recorded overly hot anyway), and the Savants just proved to be a little too detailed with this particular recording. So word of caution if you have overly bright recordings – the Savant can deliver quite brutally. Switching to Bonamassa though (his combination of vocals and guitar) was once again sublime. His live performances with the Savant could easily have had me forgetting the review and just listening to track after track.
Bass heavier music like Rap, Trance and EDM were once again where the Savant just never really exceled like it did with acoustic and vocal centred music. Eminem’s “Lose Yourself” was in a word anaemic, and although Little Dragon was still catchy and enjoyable, clearly some of what makes it so dynamic was missing.
Pop and Indie were both really good – Adele was stunning, and even Coldplay was quite engaging. Likewise, my Indie tracks – being largely vocal centric – shone with the Savant. In particular Ayla Nereo’s voice soared with Wildlight’s “Dawn to Flight” – smooth and dreamy, but again it was just missing a tiny bit of lower bass that would have made the track perfect.
The last stop for me was Classical, and here the Savant shone again for the most part (at least for my tastes). In particular string ensembles (either quartets, or full orchestra) were uplifting and mesmerising. Where the Savant struggled a little (again just IMO) was with solo piano and solo cello. There just wasn’t the depth of timbre and low tones. Kempffs rendition of Beethoven’s Sonatas and Zoe Keating’s performance with cello were both good, but strangely missing something. On the other hand, Netrebko & Garanca’s duet from Lakme was breath taking – just sheer vocal harmony and brilliance.
AMPLIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
The Noble Savant was easily powered straight out of the portable devices I have, and I haven’t experienced any issues with the iPhone 5S, or any of the Fiio Daps. With “Sultans of Swing” on the iPhone 5S I’m using around 1/3 volume. With Fiio X5ii on low gain, using the same track I’m comfortable at 30/120. I did try amping with the E17K, but noticed no obvious signs of sonic improvement.
EQUALISATION
As you may have picked up, for my own personal tastes, I would usually prefer just a little more sub-bass. So with the Fiio X5ii I raised the sub bass sliders and replayed Lorde’s “Royals”. While it was possible to elevate the sub-bass a little, I couldn’t quite achieve the definition of sub-bass I’m used to with some of my triple hybrids. So while the Savant responded well to EQ, it’s not going to turn these into sub-bass monsters. But it was very easy to increase the bass impact overall – and for tracks needing just a little more dynamic bass response, the Savant did actually respond pretty well.
I didn’t touch any of the other frequencies though, simply because the Savant mid-range is (to me) as close to perfection as I have heard.
COMPARISONS (subjective)
I thought the most interesting comparisons I could make for anyone reading this review would be to put the Savant up against my favourite multi driver hybrids. So using my X5ii I engaged a splitter and attenuator, then with an SPL meter, matched each pair of IEMs (using fixed tones) to within 0.2 dB. In each case, the Savant at $599 is up against far cheaper options – but this might be valuable for someone looking to take a step up.

Noble Savant $599 vs Trinity Delta $140
Both have very good build quality throughout – with the Savant being slightly more robust overall. I actually prefer the Delta’s cable, but the Savant’s body shape. The Savant has far better isolation. Sonically the Savant is clearer, and slightly more vivid. Comparatively the Delta has much more bass impact, but it feels slightly boomy, and is not as fast as the more nimble Savant. The Delta is smoother overall, and whilst the Savant is more vivid and euphonic, it is also a little more thin through the lower mid-range.
Noble Savant $599 vs Altone 200 $185
The Savant takes top marks on build quality, and overall fit, although the Altone 200s are also very comfortable. Both have very euphonic and vivid mid-ranges, but the Altone200 does not have quite as much balance or body in the mid-range, and has more bass impact – particularly sub-bass. Both are quite quick. The Savant overall sounds richer and has better balance.
Noble Savant $599 vs Fidue A83 $270
Both have very good build quality – but again the Savant has that superior robustness. The Savant also fit better and more easily than the Fidue. The first thing I noticed with the A83 was that compared to the Savant it is noticeably V shaped. Both are very vivid in vocal presentation, but the Savant is quicker, cleaner, and more refined. The A83 is slightly thinner / etched with female vocals, and overall the Savant sounds far more natural.
Noble Savant $599 vs Dunu DN-2000J $330
Again – both have very good build quality, and although the Savant would probably be once again more robust, I have no issues with either for overall build. Once again I prefer the DUNU cable (it has virtually no microphonics) over the stock Noble cable. The Savant is more comfortable and easier to fit. Both have a very similar mid-range, with the Savant being ever slightly more vibrant and euphonic with my female vocalists, but the DUNU not far behind, and in contrast the DN-2000J seems slightly better with male vocals. The DUNU has far better bass – in impact, extension, speed and definition. Both have impressive clarity. There is more similar with the two mid-ranges than different, with the biggest contrast being the bass, and the 2000J being slightly brighter.
Overall – in all of the comparisons, on complete package (build, fit, and sonics) – but disregarding value, the Savant would be my preference over all of my hybrids except the DN-2000J.
VALUE (subjective)
The Noble Savant has an RRP of $599 and for what it brings to the table in terms of overall package, and especially the mid-range tuning, I don’t regard the asking price as being excessive. When I first heard the Savant, and marvelled at its glorious mid-range, I know that in the back of my mind I was pondering what I could sell in order to purchase a pair. Fortunately after critical listening and comparison I may have tempered my initial reaction a little (especially after comparison with the 2000J). However the Savant is a superbly built and sonically brilliant IEM, and I do feel it is worth its asking price.
NOBLE SAVANT – SUMMARY
Well my 10 days with the Savant are now up, and I’d like to profusely thank John, Brannan, and d Marc0 for giving me the opportunity to put them through their paces. It has been an absolute privilege to spend time with them.The Noble Savant is an extremely well built and designed IEM with a vivid and compelling mid-range – which IMO is one of the best I’ve heard with female vocals. It is very detailed, very clear, and images superbly. Its sonic weakness is in bass extension – but there is enough mid-bass impact to counter this to a certain extent.
The Savant is a joy to fit, and isolates superbly – and the one personal negative I have is with the cable (microphonics) – but this is simply a matter of swapping an alternate cable out – so not a major issue.
On the value stakes, the Savant, while not cheap, does justify its price IMO as an overall package.
I mentioned above that I would comment on the drivers – and this is just my guess. The speed and vividness of the mid-range reminds me very much of a far better tuned Fischer DBA2. The lack of overall bass extension, and subsequent roll-off also points to having no dedicated bass driver – so my guess for configuration would be a dual BA set-up. I guess time will tell how close I am.
Finally, I will add that John’s “Wizard” nickname is well given. The driver tuning on the Savant is truly exquisite. I wish I could keep these.
I noticed that you mentioned that the cable is microphonic, and the IEMs are easy to sleep in. Now, I do not know if the Savant dimensions equal those of the Noble 3 classic (which I own), but on those, there are absolutely 0 microphonics below the cable cinch (and barely any above), and I have no problem wearing them with glasses in terms of noise.
However, I cannot sleep in these because they are quite wide. Don't get me wrong though, they are exceptionally comfortable, but I cannot lay on my side with them.
Any ideas? Especially about the microphonics, since the design that I have used has none.