AAW A3H Pro Custom In-Ear Monitor

crinacle

Member of the Trade: In-Ear Fidelity
Pros: Non fatiguing sound, satisfying bass rumble, rich midrange and vocals, smooth frequency response throughout, price
Cons: Relatively congested midrange, rolled off treble, veiled sound
Gear references
Favourite: D2000
Neutrality: SRH940 (audition experience with the ER4XR and the HD600)
IEM reference: Aurisonics ASG-2.0
 

 
Specifications
 
  1. 10mm Proprietary Dynamic Driver + dual driver unit Knowles TFWK-30017, dual sound bore design
  2. TruXross 3 Way Crossover (electrical crossover)
  3. Frequency response: 20 Hz - 20000 Hz
  4. Sensitivity: 105 dB SPL @ 1mW
  5. Impedance: 16 Ohm @ 1kHz
  6. THD <= 0.5% @1kHz

 

 
Packaging and accessories
 
 
AAW really steps it up with their luxurious box. It opens up sideways on a hinge, sealed shut with a magnetic mechanism. Inside, you’ll receive your CIEMs (of course), a cleaning cloth, a cleaning tool, two-pin airplane adapter, a ¼” adaptor, with a warranty-and-policy booklet sealed with fancy stamped wax. It also comes with a little card with your name written on it. I don’t much care for it, but you’re the kind who’d like that kind of personalisation, it’ll be a nice treat for you.
 

 
Build quality and fit
 
 
To put it short: superb. No air bubbles as far as I can see them and consistent translucency throughout the acrylic shell. My selected faceplates, the red and blue Mother-of-Pearl, are very well made, though upon closer inspection you can see the seams where AAW joins individual shells. Which is something I’d willing close an eye for, considering the nature of working with MOP and how they hid the seams very expertly.
 
The tiny bass port
 
 
As shown above, there is a bass port on the shell due to the dynamic driver. However, given the size of the port, it barely makes a dent in the shell’s isolation. There is hardly any difference in isolation between my custom made silicon plugs and my A3H-Pros.
 
What AAW did, as far as I can tell, is that they added additional layers to my ear impressions, making it a snug fit rather than a perfect one. This creates additional pressure against my ears, which makes it a very full sealing seal. This is in stark contrast to a previous custom I've had, a reshelled TF10 by a defunct company called Stage93. This reshell was slightly more comfortable as they've used my impressions as they received it, resulting in a more "perfect" fit. However, the seal in those customs broke with the slightly movement in my jaw (turning my head, opening my mouth etc.) which made it very annoying to wear.

 
Personally I think this fit is a good balance between comfort and seal. Obviously not perfect, but I have not had the seal break on me at all.
 
Null Audio Brevity cable w/ microphone
 
The cable is a Null Audio Brevity cable, a soft, smooth silicone-coated braided cable that is feels very comfortable against bare skin. Microphonics are higher than average, though the custom design along with the over-the-ear position makes it a non-issue.
 

 
Sound Quality
 
Frequency response
Slightly bass linear (bass > mids = treble). Bass emphasis all the way into the lower midrange where it valleys, followed by roll-off in the upper treble.
 
 
General sound signature
Warm and smooth with slightly laid-back treble, very non-fatiguing sound.
 
 
Genre strengths
Jazz and vocals, instruments like trumpets, saxophones and cello
 
 
Bass
I would consider it the star of the show seeing as how it’s the first thing that pops up when you first put it on. The bass is slightly emphasised at about 5dB+/- above neutral, valleying at 400Hz and running linearly into the sub-50 frequencies, creating good rumble and pushing air like nothing else. It extends deep into the double-digits and has extremely satisfying volume and texture.
 
However, it wouldn’t be considered a basshead’s bass. Flatheads would assume that it’s for bassheads, while bassheads would find themselves wanting more. It's a neither-here-nor-there bass that's slightly higher in quantity than the new Ety ER4XR but not as bassy as, say, the SE215. If you’re one who prefers this kind of "on-the-fence" signature, the A3H would be perfect for you.
 
On another note, the A3H’s bass is not “punchy”. There is a resonant quality to its bass due to its slower driver speed and relative balance between sub-bass and mid-bass. This creates three very obvious qualities:
 
  1. It’s not very impactful but rather very volumetric and rumbly, making its bass very smooth and easy to listen to.
  2. This overlap between of the sub-bass over the mid-bass creates a lot of resonance at the cost of speed, making the A3H struggle with very fast tracks.
  3. Bass extension is superb, very easily picking out details from the lowest reaches of the bass frequencies.
 
If anything, the A3H is reminiscent of a tiny subwoofer, not necessarily bringing speed and imapct but rather providing a dynamic and hefty bass experience.
 
 
Mids
After the initial awe of the A3H’s bass, there was something else that crept behind its shadow. Vocals, instruments, synths… if the bass was the star of the show, the midrange was its manager. The strict, workaholic manager that occasionally played along with the star’s aloof and showboaty nature. The midrange itself is clear and detailed, but when in tandem with the weight and volume of the bass frequencies creates a much more weighted sound that borrows some low-end heft from the lower-midrange frequencies. The mids and treble are handled by the time-proven and very capable TWFK-30017, a rather premium dual-driver single-bore model by Knowles that does well in retrieving the detail out of the midrange. However, previous experience with TWFK IEMs gives me the impression that TWFK drivers tend to image a rather cold, analytical and, some would say metallic, sound.
 
The A3H's tiny TWFK-30017
 
The low-end influence of the A3H's dynamic driver over the midrange creates a sound that is very distinct from the signature TWFK mids, giving vocals that added richness and various instruments that much needed volume in their sound. The coherency between the dynamic driver’s bass and the BAs’ midrange is nothing short of amazing, reminiscent of the Aurisonic’s own famous mids.
 
Onto its shortcomings, the emphasis in the lower midrange (200-600Hz) does result in a "veil" that is similar to the HD650 as well a more congested-sounding space, which weirdly matches with the rather excellent width of its soundstage. Dampening that range with an EQ improves clarity and apparent detail greatly. though at the cost of smoothness and some body.
 
 
Treble
Once out of the influence of the dynamic driver, the treble isn’t much to write home about. I can tell that the TWFK has been lightly damped, removing any stray peaks in the 3k-6k regions and resulting in a very smooth and non-fatiguing high-end. As stated above, AAW has left a little sparkle in the treble in its tuning, so I wouldn’t exactly call this IEM dark by any means, but I wouldn’t call it bright either. There is definitely more treble quantity in the A3H as compared to darker IEMs like the SE215 and even AAW's own A2H.
 
There is a rather heavy roll-off after 9K, making the sound miss some of the “air” that’s ever-so-present in my full-sized headphones. I guess if there is a silver lining to this lack of treble extension, is that combination of the linearity of the upper frequencies along with the early roll-off greatly contributes to its signature non-fatiguing sound.
 
 
Soundstage
I’m not too familiar with IEM soundstaging, so I’ll be rather quick and brief on this aspect. Of course, it wouldn’t trade blows with my D2000s, but definitely presents a bigger stage than my ASG-2.0s. It can present a very wide stage, but when coupled with the rather congested midrange creates the illusion not unlike a small band in an orchestral hall. EQing the 250Hz and 500Hz down slightly (special thanks to tz0531 for the tip) really helps to separate the midrange apart, opening up the soundstage very nicely.
 
If I remember correctly, in width it seems to be on par with the soundstage of the UE900, which according to a quick Google search seems to be pretty well-regarded.
 

 
Conclusion
 
A very solid contender in the realm of entry-level CIEMs, the A3H performs above and beyond its price point, trading blows with well-established veterans of the field. The A3H’s strong points lie in its non-fatiguing sound and well-textured bass, as well as amazing coherency between bass and mids.
 
The rabbit hole just got a little bigger.
 

 
 
Do visit the main review thread for updates and further comparisons.
 
 
Further readings:
 
Lachlan's review of an older revision of the A3H
tz0531's review of the A3H-Pro
  • Like
Reactions: Cinder and ranfan

tz0531

100+ Head-Fier
Pros: Fantastic isolation, great build quality and cable, Bass impact and extension
Cons: Veiled, overly thick mids, rolled-off treble, lack of crispness and definition, not neutral as advertised


Background

I ordered my pair of AAW A3H Pros during Black Friday weekend 2015 at a certain group-buying website, hoping to get my feet wet in the world of customs at a price that wouldn't break the bank (relatively speaking). They were advertised as being more neutral than/somewhere in between the V-shaped regular A3H and the vocal-focused A3H-V. I prefer headphones that follow the Harman Target Response Curve (see the excellent articles at Innerfidelity), since they sound subjectively balanced and neutral to me. Some IEMs that I had tried prior to the A3H Pros were the Yamaha EPH-100 (possibly fakes), Phillips Fidelio S1, Alpha and Delta AD01, Dunu DN-1000, MOE SS01, TTPOD T1E, and the Zero Audio Carbo Tenore. My go-to reference IEM is the VSonic GR07 Bass Edition, since it follows the Harman Target Response Curve quite closely, save for a bit of excess energy around the 5-8 kHz area. As such, I'll make comparisons between the A3H Pros and GR07 BE, especially since many view the GR07 and its variants as the bar IEMs must pass to be considered upper-tier IEMs.

CustomEarMonitors.jpg
Overview

Isolation: Fantastic, as to be expected from CIEMs

Build Quality: The configuration I chose was 2 pin connectors, transparent aqua blue shells, and mixed mother-of pearl faceplates. The fit and finish are nearly flawless, except for an air bubble or two in the tips. The stock cable is soft and pliable with little memory effect; one of the best cables I have seen in IEMs so far. Little to no microphonics due to the over-ear fit. Overall I was quite impressed with the build quality.

Pairing/Sensitivity: Quite efficient, can play loudly out of portable devices, although gains bass impact and better detail when amped. Impedance is quite well-controlled for a multi-driver setup, meaning the overall sound will not change too much out of a typical high-impedance source. The greatest changes out of a high-impedance source will be increased response centered at around 1700 Hz and 20 kHz, corresponding to impedance peaks. See below graph for Impedance vs Frequency.

AAWA3HProImpedancevsFreq.png
Impedance vs Frequency Graph provided by AAW representative

Bass: Great impact and punch from midbass, lots of subbass rumble with great extension, texture and speed are pretty good considering the quantity, which I'd estimate at 5-7 dB above neutral. Too much upper bass results in a muddy sound and a veiling of the mids.

Mids: Very warm and thick, veiled due to boosted upper bass, placement of vocals is more intimate than it is laid back

Highs: Very subdued and rolled off, lacking crispness, clarity, and extension

Soundstage/Imaging: Big soundstage that is as deep as it is wide. Very coherent sounding for a triple driver hybrid (obviously the proprietary phase correction circuit is doing its job). Imaging suffers due to the lack of crispness

Overall Sound Impressions: I'd describe the overall sound signature as warm and smooth rather than neutral as advertised. The bass is well above neutral, with a bass boost that starts from around 750 Hz downward, resulting in far too much upper bass, making everything sound muffled, like there is a blanket over the drivers. For instance, snare drum hits are a dull thud instead of a snappy punch. Bass bloat spills over into the midrange, making it muddy and quite thick. Treble rolls off dramatically after about 7kHz, contributing to a lack of crispness and definition. I'd estimate it to be around 5 dB below neutral. On the plus side, no sibilance whatsoever due to the rolled off treble. These two glaring tuning decisions (upper bass boost and treble rolloff) limit detail retrieval and manage to make the soundstage, which is pretty big, feel a bit claustrophobic, with instruments seeming to spill over into each other a little.

AAWA3HProFreqResponseChart.png
Frequency Response Graph provided by AAW representative

Comparisons

With VSonic GR07 Bass Edition: The GR07 BE has a much thinner, clearer sound due to lack of bass bloat and slightly above neutral mid-treble; however, sibilance is sometimes a problem on the GR07 BE, which is nonexistent on the A3H Pro. The A3H Pro has even more bass punch than the already punchy GR07 BE and significantly more subbass rumble. Soundstage width is similar, but the A3H Pro has much better depth, making the soundstage feel compressed horizontally when switching to the GR07 BE.

Equalization

By the numbers, when using a ten band graphic EQ, I find myself reducing the 250Hz band by about 5dB and the 500Hz band by about 2dB, while increasing the 4,8, and 16kHz bands by about 5dB to achieve a more neutral and clear sound. Using this resulting EQ curve, I still get very impactful, above-neutral bass with much increased clarity compared to without the EQ curve.

Concluding Thoughts

As an overall package, the A3H Pro is an otherwise great value let down by its 2 big tuning deficiencies, bass bloat and overly rolled off treble. For those looking to get into the world of CIEMs, having a CIEM at the price I paid for the A3H Pro is pretty much unheard of; however, its value to you depends on sound signature preferences: if you are after neutral sound like how these are advertised, steer clear of these, but for those who enjoy a generous bass boost and thick mids, and are deathly sensitive to sibilance while willing to trade off detail resolution and clarity, the A3H Pros just might be what you are looking for.
  • Like
Reactions: taffy2207
Koolpep
Koolpep
Yep - just confirmed - compared with my PM-3, K10, and FLC8 - not missing any highs - with an ifi iDSD nano, single ended - the upper/mid bass is still a bit bloated but I rather like that slam. I also must mention that I am using a Linum BAX cable currently as it's even more comfortable than the stock one. While it's supposed to extend the sound and improve the clarity of the highs. It also rectifies the issues with soundstage - the treble makes all the difference. 
tz0531
tz0531
Thanks for your thoughts, @Koolpep! I personally don't like investing in high-end cables, since the sound signature changes are subtle at best, contrary to what a lot of cable manufacturers would like you to believe. You'd be surprised how much confirmation bias skews perception of sound. As you can tell, I'm more in the objectivist camp when it comes to sound, and my listening impressions of the AAW A3H Pro line up well with the graphs I put in my review, including how sound signature changes are minor out of sources of varying quality due to its fairly well-controlled impedance curve. When the stock frequency response of a headphone is as far off from neutral as these are, minor changes aren't enough to make them listenable to me, major EQing is required instead, which is why I put an EQ section in my review. Thankfully, AAW contacted me after this review and asked if I wanted to review their new Nebula Two universal IEM, which I agreed to. In short, the Nebula Two is a fantastic IEM and is now my main critical listening IEM; the A3H Pro just sits in its case unused nowadays.
Koolpep
Koolpep
Hey, thanks for your comments. I am with you with the general cable skepticism, I am a big fan of blind testing, which often leads to surprising results, dramatic differences are suddenly microscopic or even disappear. Anyhow, I rather like the AH3Pro now, but my initial impressions were pretty much like yours, I found the treble to be too rolled off, but it changed after either getting used to them or changing the source. So, I don't hear them anymore like before, which is great for me. Also confirmation bias often works both ways, especially when you look at measurements. And I love my bass a bit elevated, so these are really right up my alley.
Back
Top