Quote:
Originally Posted by spritzer /img/forum/go_quote.gif
... the He90 is very diffused with an over extended and washed out sound stage. Some say that this is more speaker like but I like the pinpoint accuracy of all Stax phones.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by granodemostasa /img/forum/go_quote.gif
relatively speaking, they are warmer and more euphonic than the OII.
|
It's pretty early, but my general impressions on the HE90 are fairly in line with the above (though I disagree with Spritzer on some of the points in his full post). So far most of my listening has been with the Aristaeus (sourced by my m902 - really missing that Chord DAC64/Blu combo right now, BTW), but I have done some listening through the Dared MP-5 and a Stax SRD-7 mk2.
On the Aristaeus, I find the HE90 to be euphonic and rich sounding, relative to the 010 (straight out of the m902). Not a terrible thing if you like that sound, and in many ways it's easier to listen to because of it. I never could listen to the 010 while doing something like homework or even surfing the net, but the HE90 serves that function fine.
It also lacks the raw resolution and texture that that resolution brings with the 010. I think timber fans should look to the 010 or the Omega 2 out of a proper system. Well, let me rephrase that as I haven't really heard the HE90 out of a system that's more optimized for it as I haven't done any real tuberolling, though I far prefer my Grover Ultimate References, which are a bright cable, with the m902/Aristaeus/HE90 than my Kimber Silver Streaks, which are more middle of the road.
Anyway, there are a bunch of other thoughts, such as the HE90 making the 010's tendancy towards a hard, forward sound a lot more pronounced. Also it sounds certainly different out of the Stax transformer+power amp (lol, surprisingly a lot more impactful, which makes it sound a bit more Stax-like), so there's a lot more exploring to do. But generally, at least this initial week out of the Aristaeus setup, it's rather warm and euphonic to me, and lacks the raw textural detail I get from the 010, K 1000 or SR-X mk3.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gpalmer /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Uhhh, I don't think you should be trying to get the R-10 to approximate the sound of the HE-90. They are distinctly different headphones each with their own strengths. The best I've heard the R-10's sound they were notable for the manner in which they brought the instruments to life. That isn't really the HE-90's strength though, what strikes me as magic is the depth of its relaxation while it's performing audio gymnastics. It's a wonder how it glides smoothly through its paces.
|
Whoa, it's that clerks guy again!! Tampa?? Geez, yer just hitting all the major head-fi communities aren't you??
Anyway, yeah, there is no question that the definitive strength of the HE90 for me is how graceful and relaxed it is. It is detailed, but relaxed in that detail (unlike the 010). It's also incredibly balanced - it does do many things fairly well, though it doesn't impress in any one area. It does sound euphonic to me, though this should be tweakable through system changes, though I doubt it'll ever get as analytical or "accurate" as some of my other cans (SR-X mk3, K 1000, 010). It certainly lacks the dynamics of the HP1000. But still, it's incredibly easy to listen to, which is good, I suppose if you're in that kind of mood.
More thoughts as time goes on...
Best,
-Jason