I'm not hugely experienced in the IEM market, but part of the reason for that is that the JH Angie nails my preferences so well I feel no need to even keep looking and trying anything else. With full-sized headphones I wasn't happy until I had done quite a bit of testing and comparisons. I was in love with the HD800's soundstage immediately, but it took weeks of tinkering, trying different amps, modifying them, and learning how to EQ to get them where I like them most. With the Angie, it's like, nope, this is it. Crinacle hates them, and he's
the guy everyone goes to for IEM info, so my tastes might not be representative. I definitely don't hear them as 'neutral.' There's a specific kind of warmth to them that I don't know how to liken to anything else, to the point that it sounds like everything has been put through some kind of unique filter. It makes vocals incredible. I'd take it over an LCD-3 because it nails a similar kind of warmth without being so dark and having the touch of 'mud' that the 3 does.
I'm really terrible at giving the typical audiophile descriptions. And if I'm being honest I really feel suspicious most people don't actually know what they're talking about when they try to use most of these adjectives anyway. It's just too easy to get caught up in fancy prose and not be sure what any of it means. How you hear things changes so much from day to day, with random stuff like atmospheric pressure changes, or even slight dehydration or how much serotonin you got from the carbs in your last meal. I can describe my personal experience so far though, with the caveat that this is just indulgent autobiography and not science.
Going quickly from the VC to the Atticus, my first impression is "yeah, this sounds great to me, it's just a different flavor." Going quickly from the Atticus to the VC, my first impression is the same: "yeah, sounds great to me, it's just a different flavor." But after adjusting to the VC with a long listen and then going back to the Atticus, it's really clear the VC is on a different plane. I feel like there's something I'm missing, which I don't coming from a long listen with the Atticus and going back to VC. I guess that's a good measurement for how "refined" something is, when it takes subconscious adjustment to feel the full impact of it. I can't analyze this to any specific detail, and I feel like that makes it more valid rather than less. I thought it might be related to the upper extension, but EQ'ing sub and 10kHz< on the Atticus doesn't change it. The VC just comes across as being more.... holistic? It's almost like the Atticus has slightly more "stage," but that's because there are gaps inserted between things rather than the butter being spread further. Keep in mind I still own the first HD800 I ever bought.
It's obvious I'd keep the VC if I could only own one, but I like having a few different things to change things up with. The two are different enough to renew my engagement with the music after a switch, but not so different that it's jarring like going back and forth between an HD800 and an LCD3, which I did for a long time lol. I've decided if I ever
need to downsize for emergency cash, I could happily live with the Atticus, I'm not spoiled enough and it's not weak enough that I'd be miserable doing that. For comparison, I wouldn't feel that way about an LCD2 or HD6xx line. I ran that test on myself before too and it was disappointing, I resold them pretty fast. I wouldn't
advise owning both to anyone, but it's sure as hell more plausible than something like owning both an LCD3 and 4 IMO. As you go from LCD-2 to 4 it's just unequivocal upgrades in my book, and that isn't
exactly the case here, there's some "upgrade" and some "difference."
I'm sensitive to a little bit of shout on the VC with some of the extreme metal I listen to, so I use a very minimal EQ. It's literally a decibel added to the bass with a decibel taken off 2550, and half a decibel taken off 5750 and 8000. As small as it is it really makes a world of difference, they go from occasionally uncomfortable at the volume I like (keep in I'm talking stuff like Meshuggah here) to
perfect. The Atticus hits the unique thing it does without any adjustments, but feels more like a coloration than a different take on music representation. The brightness... man, the only thing I can find on Crinacle's graph that could
possibly explain it is the Atticus has more volume at 14kHz-or-so. It would be ridiculous to call it "V-shaped" but I feel like that's the
direction it takes the tone for me, so I guess I hear it as bassier but also a touch less relaxing.
Zach is probably reading this and thinking he's glad he never let me do a real review