WOW ... foobar with the kernel streaming plug in just blew my mind
Oct 3, 2009 at 4:20 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 56

bergman2

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Aug 1, 2007
Posts
701
Likes
10
wavs/flacs > foobar 9.6.9 (with KS plug in) > usb > TA USB 10.1 > 110ohm AES/EBU balanced out > bjc 110ohm cable > lavry da10 110ohm balanced in > zu rca's > earmax pro (baldwin 12ax7 & amperex 6922 white labels) > 650's


i just installed the foobar kernel streaming plug-in on a lark in place of the trusty asio and was pleasantly surprised by the enhanced sq .. there were a couple pop up boxes from windows and foobar about known compatability issues, and my computer sometimes needs a restart when I try to play through my speakers on the on board chip but my 650's are singing now
 
Oct 3, 2009 at 4:26 AM Post #3 of 56

TheMarchingMule

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Feb 1, 2006
Posts
9,158
Likes
20
Location
SoCal
Have you tried WASAPI (assuning you have Vista/7 running)?
evil_smiley.gif
 
Oct 3, 2009 at 4:31 AM Post #4 of 56

bergman2

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Aug 1, 2007
Posts
701
Likes
10
WASSUP with WASAPI?
 
Oct 3, 2009 at 4:37 AM Post #6 of 56

bergman2

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Aug 1, 2007
Posts
701
Likes
10
I am, admittedly, prone to hyperbole but separation, extension and weight seem much improved

in re MM comments, perhaps i will give wasapi a try later this weekend
 
Oct 3, 2009 at 8:40 AM Post #7 of 56

krmathis

Head-Fi's Most Prolific Poster
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Posts
34,764
Likes
74
Yeah, KS certainly make am audible difference. Enjoy!
smile.gif
 
Oct 3, 2009 at 12:46 PM Post #8 of 56

sonci

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Apr 3, 2008
Posts
898
Likes
14
Quote:

Originally Posted by krmathis /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Yeah, KS certainly make am audible difference. Enjoy!
smile.gif



Why, it should do the same as ASIO
 
Oct 3, 2009 at 12:56 PM Post #9 of 56

leeperry

Galvanically isolated his brain
Joined
Apr 23, 2004
Posts
13,622
Likes
1,274
it depends on the windows driver implementation. ASIO is third party and has its own latency timer.

DirectKS is part of the WDM architecture. everything's based on KS in windows, and DirectKS is the m$ KMixer-free answer to ASIO.

DirectKS Sample Application
Quote:

the DirectKS approach results in exclusive access to the audio device, which can break many aspects of the user experience, including disabling warning alert sounds and loss of interoperability with other audio applications.


on my board DirectKS in foobar works in bit-matched/bit-perfect/exclusive mode on XP SP3 and forbids SRC, good stuff
smily_headphones1.gif


but DirectKS is m00t on the Asus soundcards(not bit-matched, no exclusive mode)...so again, it all falls back to how the windows drivers were written in the first place.
 
Oct 3, 2009 at 1:04 PM Post #10 of 56

krmathis

Head-Fi's Most Prolific Poster
Joined
Jan 13, 2004
Posts
34,764
Likes
74
Quote:

Originally Posted by sonci /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Why, it should do the same as ASIO


I meant compared to foobar2000 in stock configuration, using Direct Sound.
 
Oct 3, 2009 at 1:23 PM Post #11 of 56

sonci

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Apr 3, 2008
Posts
898
Likes
14
Yes, if you read the original OP post, he was on ASIO and converted to KS,
for that I find strange that big difference,
or maybe we should need some Lavry **** to get illuminated,
 
Oct 3, 2009 at 1:48 PM Post #12 of 56

LingLing1337

CAUTION INCOMPLETE TRADES
Joined
Mar 13, 2007
Posts
2,602
Likes
27
Quote:

Originally Posted by sonci /img/forum/go_quote.gif
or maybe we should need some Lavry **** to get illuminated,


Well, you see, it would take several degrees in mathematics and engineering to understand exactly why KS presents such an advantage.
 
Oct 3, 2009 at 9:40 PM Post #13 of 56

bergman2

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Aug 1, 2007
Posts
701
Likes
10
Quote:

Originally Posted by sonci /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Yes, if you read the original OP post, he was on ASIO and converted to KS,
for that I find strange that big difference,
or maybe we should need some Lavry **** to get illuminated,



perhaps so, and perhaps the settings i had selected didnt fully maximize its capabilities ... at any rate, i am quite happy with the current bit perfect output settings with ks
 
Oct 3, 2009 at 10:16 PM Post #14 of 56

Shahrose

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Dec 14, 2006
Posts
3,907
Likes
274
Location
Toronto, Canada
I compared WASAPI and KS and found that KS produced a more prominent high end and also slightly more bass impact. WASAPI was smoother and put the mids more up front. These were subtle but reproducible results and from what I described above, the treble was the most obvious difference between the two.
 
Oct 3, 2009 at 10:22 PM Post #15 of 56

FasterThanEver

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Nov 10, 2005
Posts
155
Likes
11
Quote:

Originally Posted by bergman2 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
wavs/flacs > foobar 9.6.9 (with KS plug in) > usb > TA USB 10.1 > 110ohm AES/EBU balanced out > bjc 110ohm cable > lavry da10 110ohm balanced in > zu rca's > earmax pro (baldwin 12ax7 & amperex 6922 white labels) > 650's


i just installed the foobar kernel streaming plug-in on a lark in place of the trusty asio and was pleasantly surprised by the enhanced sq .. there were a couple pop up boxes from windows and foobar about known compatability issues, and my computer sometimes needs a restart when I try to play through my speakers on the on board chip but my 650's are singing now



Do I understand that you were using the Foobar ASIO plugin and ASIO4All? (which actually send output to the WDM kernel streaming interface.)

And now you are using the kernel streaming plugin to send output directly to WDM kernel streaming?

If I have this right, you are using kernel streaming both ways.

Bill
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top