Would You consider the Mad Dogs Neutral?
post-9195959
Thread Starter
Post #1 of 11

Noahjaws

Head-Fier
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Messages
95
Reaction score
11
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Posts
95
Likes
11
Are these cans considered neutral?
 
What do they compare to?
 
     Share This Post       
post-9196277
Post #2 of 11

Noahjaws

Head-Fier
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Messages
95
Reaction score
11
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Posts
95
Likes
11
Anyone??
 
     Share This Post       
post-9196302
Post #3 of 11

Bill-P

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
2,108
Reaction score
333
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Posts
2,108
Likes
333
Nope. They are very very very very (keep adding more "very") far from neutral to me.
 
Mad Dogs have a warm-ish sound signature that's spacious and fairly clean, with some slight midrange emphasis.
 
If I have to compare them to any headphone, they would be like the HD 650, only with an even warmer sound signature.
 
     Share This Post       
post-9196433
Post #4 of 11

jazzerdave

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Aug 25, 2012
Messages
782
Reaction score
30
Joined
Aug 25, 2012
Posts
782
Likes
30
Quote:
Are these cans considered neutral?
 
What do they compare to?
 
I strongly disagree with Bill on this question, but we use wildly different amplification.
 
If you're just concerned about neutrality, here's a rank of my headphones (once again, the order here is just based upon neutrality):
1) HE-6
2) Mad Dogs with Alpha Pads
3) LCD-3
4) ESP-950
5) HD650
I use a Schiit Magni, Schiit Asgard, Decware Taboo, and Cavalli Liquid Glass for amplification.  I do imagine that when under-powered, they may indeed be quite far from neutral.  
 
     Share This Post       
post-9196579
Post #5 of 11

KCxSmacker

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Aug 24, 2012
Messages
735
Reaction score
28
Joined
Aug 24, 2012
Posts
735
Likes
28
I am more with Jazzer here. I find the Mad Dogs to be pretty neutral but maybe a slight bit warm due to the bass. That may just be the sound of a closed headphone talking too. Wont find a more neutral/enjoyable closed back headphones in that price range that can match them though IMO. 
 
cheers
 
     Share This Post       
post-9197292
Post #6 of 11

Bill-P

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Messages
2,108
Reaction score
333
Joined
Jan 24, 2012
Posts
2,108
Likes
333
I don't think it's just the amp. I was driving the Mad Dog through Dan's Schiit Lyr at the recent SF Bay Area meet, with the iPhone 5 as the source (using Apple Lightning to 30-pin connector adapter, which has a Wolfson DAC). The pairing was as far from neutral as I can remember.
 
I also had a lot of HD800 and LCD-2 around the area to compare. The Mad Dog was significantly warmer than all of them.
 
It was only when I heard the Mad Dog through the Meridian Explorer DAC, and later with my C&C BH that I could hear some neutrality.
 
     Share This Post       
post-9197332
Post #7 of 11

MattTCG

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jan 22, 2012
Messages
15,426
Reaction score
3,161
Joined
Jan 22, 2012
Posts
15,426
Likes
3,161
Quote:
 
I strongly disagree with Bill on this question, but we use wildly different amplification.
 
If you're just concerned about neutrality, here's a rank of my headphones (once again, the order here is just based upon neutrality):
1) HE-6
2) Mad Dogs with Alpha Pads
3) LCD-3
4) ESP-950
5) HD650
I use a Schiit Magni, Schiit Asgard, Decware Taboo, and Cavalli Liquid Glass for amplification.  I do imagine that when under-powered, they may indeed be quite far from neutral.  
 
This is right on the money to my ears.
 
     Share This Post       
post-9197470
Post #8 of 11

kramer5150

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
14,427
Reaction score
180
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Posts
14,427
Likes
180
I found them to be on the warmer side of the spectrum.  Warm, smooth and pleasant overall.  Maybe some slight lower midrange / upper bass emphacis compared to my K701.  I wish I had the forethought of A/B comparing Dans phones to my K701 on his demo rig... so keep my commentary in its proper perspective.
 
     Share This Post       
post-9197485
Post #9 of 11

Noahjaws

Head-Fier
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Messages
95
Reaction score
11
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Posts
95
Likes
11
How do the Mad Dogs compare to Sony's MDR-R1???

I've been looking at both.
 
     Share This Post       
post-9197503
Post #10 of 11

paradoxper

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Mar 10, 2012
Messages
6,979
Reaction score
1,296
Joined
Mar 10, 2012
Posts
6,979
Likes
1,296
Quote:
 
I strongly disagree with Bill on this question, but we use wildly different amplification.
 
If you're just concerned about neutrality, here's a rank of my headphones (once again, the order here is just based upon neutrality):
1) HE-6
2) Mad Dogs with Alpha Pads
3) LCD-3
4) ESP-950
5) HD650
I use a Schiit Magni, Schiit Asgard, Decware Taboo, and Cavalli Liquid Glass for amplification.  I do imagine that when under-powered, they may indeed be quite far from neutral.  
Add a +1 to that.
 
     Share This Post       
post-9207001
Post #11 of 11

KCxSmacker

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Aug 24, 2012
Messages
735
Reaction score
28
Joined
Aug 24, 2012
Posts
735
Likes
28
Quote:
How do the Mad Dogs compare to Sony's MDR-R1???

I've been looking at both.
I have both and say with the right amp Mad Dogs any day. If you don't have an amp then the MDRR1 will be a much better choice. Overall quality goes to Mad Dogs though IMO. 
 
     Share This Post       

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top