JeffS
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2003
- Posts
- 725
- Likes
- 0
Ok, I just dug out my old MZ-R50 Minidisc that's been collecting dust for
a few years now. I decided to give it a listen with my new er-6i phones.
I used some discs that I had recorded through the optical in on the same unit
about 4 years ago. The sound was great, made me remember why I loved MD way back when. So I decided to compare it to my MZ-N510 which I use daily. Same disc, Same phones, same settings, no eq, no bass boost, no differences.
I heard a difference.
At first I thought that I was imagining it. So I replayed certain tracks to certain points to listen more closely. I can't quite put my finger on it, so I
come to all of you here at headfi for help. What was the difference?
the R50 sounded louder at the same volume levels, but it sounded clearer, cleaner. And this may sound goofy since these aren't the classic tubes we're talking about, but warmer and almost inviting. (No, I haven't had anything to drink yet. Yet)
When I compared it to the same songs, and parts of songs on the 510, the 510 seemed muffled, held back. It almost sounded more processed. I'm guessing this is the difference in the on board DAC. But I noticed that while my R50 was at a smidge over a quarter of the volume, my 510 was a the halfway point. and the 510 still didn't have the impact.
Is this where an amp comes into play?
Would an amp make the 510 sound better?
Am I now spoiled for my retro days, and permenantly stuck living on
older equipment?
Thanks
-Jeff
a few years now. I decided to give it a listen with my new er-6i phones.
I used some discs that I had recorded through the optical in on the same unit
about 4 years ago. The sound was great, made me remember why I loved MD way back when. So I decided to compare it to my MZ-N510 which I use daily. Same disc, Same phones, same settings, no eq, no bass boost, no differences.
I heard a difference.
At first I thought that I was imagining it. So I replayed certain tracks to certain points to listen more closely. I can't quite put my finger on it, so I
come to all of you here at headfi for help. What was the difference?
the R50 sounded louder at the same volume levels, but it sounded clearer, cleaner. And this may sound goofy since these aren't the classic tubes we're talking about, but warmer and almost inviting. (No, I haven't had anything to drink yet. Yet)
When I compared it to the same songs, and parts of songs on the 510, the 510 seemed muffled, held back. It almost sounded more processed. I'm guessing this is the difference in the on board DAC. But I noticed that while my R50 was at a smidge over a quarter of the volume, my 510 was a the halfway point. and the 510 still didn't have the impact.
Is this where an amp comes into play?
Would an amp make the 510 sound better?
Am I now spoiled for my retro days, and permenantly stuck living on
older equipment?
Thanks
-Jeff