Maxvla
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2002
- Posts
- 8,565
- Likes
- 656
Try reading my post before you go on your holy crusade.
I never said the amp was bad, merely under performing for the money considering the competition. A balanced amp with more than double the power for the same money as a single ended amp? There's only so far you can go with the 'sound' argument. I don't have to hear either amp to know the Little Dot is the better value so long as both are well constructed and there are no audible flaws (buzzing, etc). Will the Little Dot sound better than the WA6? That is up to the end user, but to ignore the trove of extras you get for the same money would be unwise.
I should note that I don't make a habit of reading threads in the amp section because as I said, I'm perfectly happy with my amp. It is in threads other than these that I see the comments about the WA6 and SE. These, to me, are more telling because they are not in the amp section where everyone pushes their own agenda on the topic at hand.
My agenda in this post is to highlight the factual differences between the amps, make the OP aware of these and the associated costs, and let him decide with everything laid out for him. I have no allegiance to any certain company, but I will recognize a better value when I see one. I don't care which amp the OP buys so long as he is satisfied with the performance for the money. In my opinion the MKVI has a much higher chance to meet that satisfaction. Call me biased, or whatever you want, but the proof has already been posted.
I never said the amp was bad, merely under performing for the money considering the competition. A balanced amp with more than double the power for the same money as a single ended amp? There's only so far you can go with the 'sound' argument. I don't have to hear either amp to know the Little Dot is the better value so long as both are well constructed and there are no audible flaws (buzzing, etc). Will the Little Dot sound better than the WA6? That is up to the end user, but to ignore the trove of extras you get for the same money would be unwise.
I should note that I don't make a habit of reading threads in the amp section because as I said, I'm perfectly happy with my amp. It is in threads other than these that I see the comments about the WA6 and SE. These, to me, are more telling because they are not in the amp section where everyone pushes their own agenda on the topic at hand.
My agenda in this post is to highlight the factual differences between the amps, make the OP aware of these and the associated costs, and let him decide with everything laid out for him. I have no allegiance to any certain company, but I will recognize a better value when I see one. I don't care which amp the OP buys so long as he is satisfied with the performance for the money. In my opinion the MKVI has a much higher chance to meet that satisfaction. Call me biased, or whatever you want, but the proof has already been posted.