Quote:
Originally Posted by JaGWiRE
So we've discussed cheapo wines from wineries, but how does more expensive wine from wineries compare to similiar brand name wines of the same price. Speaking in terms of $8-2xx or so I guess.
|
They don't even compare. Right now Yellowtail is the most popular wine in the US. Why? Because, one it's dirt cheap, two it tastes decent if you've only had similar stuff, and three they leave a small amount of residual sugar in the wine which appeals to Americans who've grown up their whole lives driking Pepsis and Cokes. Me and my dad just flew up to SF this week and while we were up there we also drove to Napa. One of the wineries there, Anderson Conn, had some of the best wine I've sampled in a while (My dad let me try some of each
), we tried his special label Ghost Horse, a $300, 2001 Cab, and it was amazing. So smooth, yet there were so many different flavors, and he had just popped the bottle too, so it hadn't even had a chance to breathe yet. Even when comparing it to a '95 Palmer which is a $140, 94 point WS rated wine, there was no comparison. The Palmer tasted watery and flat when compared. You don't need to go with a name brand to get great tasting wine, and more expensive doesn't
always mean better but generally the more you pay, the more you get, usually bottles around $300-500 are
really, really good, Lafite, Latour, Pomerol, Palmer, Leoville, all make great wines that'll blow almost anything of those "Great Deals" out of the water. Moderately priced wines are still really good, and some are really good, but everyone once in a while an excellent bottle is good to have.