LFF
Co-Organizer for Can Jam '09
Member of the Trade: Paradox
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2004
- Posts
- 7,055
- Likes
- 267
sn't this still a matter of preference? Since Fremer grew up with records, his mind was trained to disregard the popping and hissing of vinyl. Someone who grew up listening to digital-only music might be likely to prefer the "flatness" of CD's or lossless encoding over the quirks of vinyl. Let me put it this way, a few weeks ago Giz posted the results of a study that concluded that young listeners actually prefer shoddy mp3 recordings. Fast-forward 60 years from now...what sound will the audiophiles prefer at that point in time? |
Originally Posted by demoNMaCHiN3 /img/forum/go_quote.gif "but going from 98.6 to 99.1 by swapping out a $2,600 AC power cable for a $4,000 one becomes a justifiable end. We did exactly that, and I strained to hear any difference at all (more impressions of our test will follow later in the week), but to Fremer, the difference was abundantly clear—not necessarily better with the more expensive cable, but different, a warmer, fuller sound, as Fremer described it." i'm sorry but it's stuff like this that gives audiophiles a bad name. |
I'm glad hi-fi is being shown in the news, but I absolutely hate it when the journalist states the price point as if to go "zomg look, these are so expensive; they HAVE to be good!" That's how BOSE works, and look how many sucker they get a day. ![]() |
Originally Posted by Currawong /img/forum/go_quote.gif What's grossly ironic is that even a slightly different position when you're sitting can change one's perception of the sound from a system and his room will have a constantly changing mess of CDs and other gear floating around. Yet he can hear a tiny difference between top-end power cords? I admit being a cable believer but I have trouble with it going that far. Interesting comments about vinyl. I wish I could justify a huge vinyl investment, but I can't. I would love to have the kind of 3D listening they experienced. |