Why so little mention of the SOL Tracks HD?
Feb 27, 2013 at 5:29 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 3

BigCabDaddy

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Feb 21, 2013
Posts
438
Likes
15
As I've mentioned elsewhere, I'm the proud new owner of AT ESW9 headphones. But at Christmas I'd gotten my oldest daughter a pair of [size=small]SOL Tracks HD before starting this journey back into audiophilia. Just now was the first time we had the occasion to A/B compare the two. For good measure, we threw in my Sony MDR-7506 which is still my recording monitor.[/size]
 
[size=small]Well, there definitely is a difference. With the ESW9 you get more of the "grain" of string bowing than the SOL. With the SOL you get more of a lush, thick sound without it seeming overly bassy. But here's the thing: We A/B'd two tracks. My daughter's contribution was a Beyonce track. Mine was a Zoe Keating one. (Forest) Our conclusion was the SOL sounded more appropriate for her music and the ESW9 for mine. The one factor that might have swayed me towards the ESW9 for general listening was that they seemed to have a better sound stage and placement. What would sway me to the SOLs is they are undeniably more rugged and would hold up better to a student's life. But the salient point here is the SOL really didn't seem markedly inferior to the ESW9. My daughter and I were in agreement that were we to listen to each other's music on an ongoing basis, we would prefer each other's headphones.[/size]
 
[size=small]So my question is why do we hear so little here about SOLs? Or am I just following the wrong threads. As I think about the requests for recommendations I read over in that one thread, it seems to me that the SOLs might frequently be recommended as appropriate but I don't recall seeing it mentioned once.[/size]
 
[size=small]Oh and the [/size][size=small]MDR-7506s[/size][size=small]? They represented themselves very well leaning more towards the SOLs. That made me very happy because I can get a very different listening experience between the two pairs of cans I presently own. But it was also a little unsettling. I see the MDR-7506 all the time on ebay for around $25 while I paid $170 for my ESW9s. Don't get me wrong; I'm still happy with my purchase but if it came down to it, I sure don't hear 7x the value in the ESW9s.[/size]
 
Feb 27, 2013 at 5:34 PM Post #2 of 3

KodaO

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jun 23, 2012
Posts
171
Likes
64
Quote:
As I've mentioned elsewhere, I'm the proud new owner of AT ESW9 headphones. But at Christmas I'd gotten my oldest daughter a pair of [size=small]SOL Tracks HD before starting this journey back into audiophilia. Just now was the first time we had the occasion to A/B compare the two. For good measure, we threw in my Sony MDR-7506 which is still my recording monitor.[/size]
 
[size=small]Well, there definitely is a difference. With the ESW9 you get more of the "grain" of string bowing than the SOL. With the SOL you get more of a lush, thick sound without it seeming overly bassy. But here's the thing: We A/B'd two tracks. My daughter's contribution was a Beyonce track. Mine was a Zoe Keating one. (Forest) Our conclusion was the SOL sounded more appropriate for her music and the ESW9 for mine. The one factor that might have swayed me towards the ESW9 for general listening was that they seemed to have a better sound stage and placement. What would sway me to the SOLs is they are undeniably more rugged and would hold up better to a student's life. But the salient point here is the SOL really didn't seem markedly inferior to the ESW9. My daughter and I were in agreement that were we to listen to each other's music on an ongoing basis, we would prefer each other's headphones.[/size]
 
[size=small]So my question is why do we hear so little here about SOLs? Or am I just following the wrong threads. As I think about the requests for recommendations I read over in that one thread, it seems to me that the SOLs might frequently be recommended as appropriate but I don't recall seeing it mentioned once.[/size]
 
[size=small]Oh and the [/size][size=small]MDR-7506s[/size][size=small]? They represented themselves very well leaning more towards the SOLs. That made me very happy because I can get a very different listening experience between the two pairs of cans I presently own. But it was also a little unsettling. I see the MDR-7506 all the time on ebay for around $25 while I paid $170 for my ESW9s. Don't get me wrong; I'm still happy with my purchase but if it came down to it, I sure don't hear 7x the value in the ESW9s.[/size]

A lot of the reason people here on Head-fi, or what I see at least, is that a lot of the headphones that base their focus on style, and target younger audiences; i.e Beats, Skullcandy, SOL also included. I've heard the V8, V10, and V12, and of the group, the V10 +12 sound quite decent for their price points. It's just that a lot of headphone manufacturers sacrifice sound quality for style. 
 
I'm pretty sure you knew ALL of this, but that's my honest opinion. I feel the same way about my Mix Masters. Clean, mid forward sound, with an unappealing price tag.
 
Feb 27, 2013 at 5:37 PM Post #3 of 3

BigCabDaddy

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Feb 21, 2013
Posts
438
Likes
15
Quote:
A lot of the reason people here on Head-fi, or what I see at least, is that a lot of the headphones that base their focus on style, and target younger audiences; i.e Beats, Skullcandy, SOL also included. I've heard the V8, V10, and V12, and of the group, the V10 +12 sound quite decent for their price points. It's just that a lot of headphone manufacturers sacrifice sound quality for style. 
 
I'm pretty sure you knew ALL of this, but that's my honest opinion. I feel the same way about my Mix Masters. Clean, mid forward sound, with an unappealing price tag.

OK, fair enough. I would argue that the "woodie" aspect of the ESW9s is for style appeal to old farts like me. Pot calling the kettle black?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top