gtortorella
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- May 20, 2004
- Posts
- 580
- Likes
- 11
As this time of year inspires reflection, I thought I would share this question I have been pondering.
Back in the early 1990s, a very wise dealer and audio enthusiast commented to me that a CD player "is still a toy." At the time, I thought his comment was a bit of an exaggeration, but, years later, I understood the wisdom in his words.
In around 1980, we digiphiles were promised "perfect sound forever." This catchy catchphrase stuck with CDs for quite some time, but when did the digital domain really begin to prove its merits? Here is my answer: While I had dabbled with an NAD player and some other gear prior to 1992, the player that "turned the tide" for me was the CAL Icon Mk.II. This 18-bit overachiever was a fine player--the first truly analog-sounding player I had heard. The first audiophile seminar I attended featured a CAL Delta/Sigma combo. These separates were my "dream" gear for a long time.
I welcome your thoughts on this question.
Back in the early 1990s, a very wise dealer and audio enthusiast commented to me that a CD player "is still a toy." At the time, I thought his comment was a bit of an exaggeration, but, years later, I understood the wisdom in his words.
In around 1980, we digiphiles were promised "perfect sound forever." This catchy catchphrase stuck with CDs for quite some time, but when did the digital domain really begin to prove its merits? Here is my answer: While I had dabbled with an NAD player and some other gear prior to 1992, the player that "turned the tide" for me was the CAL Icon Mk.II. This 18-bit overachiever was a fine player--the first truly analog-sounding player I had heard. The first audiophile seminar I attended featured a CAL Delta/Sigma combo. These separates were my "dream" gear for a long time.
I welcome your thoughts on this question.