Which has better bass? Perreaux or X-Can v3?

Jun 9, 2004 at 4:35 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 3

3lusiv3

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Feb 10, 2004
Posts
3,677
Likes
13
Which has better bass? Perreaux or X-Can v3?

I'm thinking about getting one of these, since they are cheaper than anything else when buying from Australia so I'd like to know which of the two has better bass?
 
Jun 9, 2004 at 6:15 AM Post #2 of 3
Perreaux.... easily.

The X-Can v3 goes down to 30 Hz. The Perreaux goes to 5 Hz at -0.5 db. Also the Perreaux has firmer, faster bass and slams harder.
 
Jun 9, 2004 at 8:11 AM Post #3 of 3
Cause us Aussies have so few choices I listened to both these two amps. The Xcans3 was "sweet" it made Diana Krall sound great... smooth mid range, very tubey and a nice sound. My wife may have even preferred this amp. But I bought the Perreaux (only to return it ten listening hours later). The Perreaux definitely had better upper treble, which was in my view rolled off in the Music Fidelity amp.

The Perreaux didn't have that magic tube musicality but it had loads of tight accuracy. In my view a nice amp. But, I'd been spoilt by a better bass slam out of my NAD amp. And bass slam is, well, essential to me as long as it isn't boomy or bloated.

Plus the Perreaux has a line out and dual headphone plugs as a bonus.

I believe if you bought the Xcan3 you might want more detail after prolonged listening... you might feel differently, but for me the detail was well below what I require and certainly the Perreaux was quite detailed enough for me.

That said, I did agonise between the two in multiple auditioning sessions 'cause that Xcans3 is just so musical and well, fun.

I'll post my impressions of some other amps available in Australia as I travel to Snufkins in Perth in a month.

Cheers,

TonyAAA
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top