GrandNagus50
100+ Head-Fier
I think he means "dull." But I don't agree. They just have slightly different emphases in their overall sound signatures.
The Lola does have a "bigger sound" over the Jimi, but can be a little bloated in the mids to mid lows for some. Now those can be turned down of course. The Lola was originally designed for on stage guitar use while the Jimi was designed with a more vinyl-like sound signature. Both are fun for sure, but being a little bit of a vinyl lover the Jimi takes a higher ranking IMO.I'm waiting for the universal Jimi to be shipped,
How does the Jimi compare to the Lola?
Warm and simple are the two best words I would use. These are not going to be as articulate and detailed as say the 13v2 or 16v2. Not have the power of a Roxanne or Lola, just enjoyable to listen to like a nice record over a digital file.What is a vinyl-like sound signature? Not being snarky here; I am curious.
Thanks for that, very much appreciatedThe Lola does have a "bigger sound" over the Jimi, but can be a little bloated in the mids to mid lows for some. Now those can be turned down of course. The Lola was originally designed for on stage guitar use while the Jimi was designed with a more vinyl-like sound signature. Both are fun for sure, but being a little bit of a vinyl lover the Jimi takes a higher ranking IMO.
Mine have arrived and I see what you mean.Warm and simple are the two best words I would use. These are not going to be as articulate and detailed as say the 13v2 or 16v2. Not have the power of a Roxanne or Lola, just enjoyable to listen to like a nice record over a digital file.