What are the benefits of a 'stepped attenuator'?
- Thread starter meech
- Start date
lan
Videographus Supremus:Makes audio cables using super-advanced materials, like "some clear tape" and "some not so clear tape."
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2002
- Messages
- 8,604
- Reaction score
- 13
lan
Videographus Supremus:Makes audio cables using super-advanced materials, like "some clear tape" and "some not so clear tape."
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2002
- Posts
- 8,604
- Likes
- 13
It's a volume control with many resistor combinations that make precise volume levels.
They're good. Get 'um
They're good. Get 'um


chillysalsa
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2002
- Messages
- 1,971
- Reaction score
- 173
As I understand, it depends on the particular stepped att' that you're talking about.
Some get better impedance characteristics across the frequency spectrum. They can also offer closer L/R channel matching than a potentiometer.
Some get better impedance characteristics across the frequency spectrum. They can also offer closer L/R channel matching than a potentiometer.
JeffL
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2003
- Messages
- 917
- Reaction score
- 2
To "attenuate" in terms of volume (loudness) means to lower, or to soften. "Make quieter" if you will.
A stepped attenutaor would do this in steps, as opposed to logarithmically, exponentially, or linearly, as a potentiometer (variable resistor) would.
A stepped attenutaor would do this in steps, as opposed to logarithmically, exponentially, or linearly, as a potentiometer (variable resistor) would.
sacd lover
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2002
- Messages
- 8,190
- Reaction score
- 33
Stepped or ladder attenuators only put a single, or at most a few, high quality resistors in the signal path; as opposed to the conductive plastics used in standard poteniometers. The attenuators give you more refinement and added resolution to my ears. Example refinement: there is a glare or electronic signature removed whenever I listen to a good attenuator. Example resolution:I can better hear low level sounds and decays to notes, as well as a better sense of the recorded space with attenuators. The only problem with an attenuator is setting the volume just right. I thought using an attenuator was a nightmare with the sony cd3000's low impedence and high sensitivity. However, with the high impedence headphones like the dt 880 or senn 580/600/650 that are also lower sensitivity and require a higher volume setting, the attenuator was easy to get right. An attenuator will not make a bad amp into a good one, but it can easily make a good amp even better.

Mindless
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2003
- Messages
- 1,037
- Reaction score
- 12
As sacd lover said, it would probably make a good amp even better. However they are quite pricey for beeing a thing to lower/highten the volume. A stepped attenuator is also stepped, för example 12, or 24 steps. The more the better I would say as you get better precision the more steps it has because lets say that a potentiometer could turn 360 degrees. A 12 stepped would increase the volume very much with 1 step compared to a 24 stepped.
jefemeister
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2003
- Messages
- 2,807
- Reaction score
- 11
Quote:
When you think about volume control being the entire objective of a preamp, it makes sense that the device used to control the volume would be among the most important.
Originally posted by Mindless However they are quite pricey for beeing a thing to lower/highten the volume. |
When you think about volume control being the entire objective of a preamp, it makes sense that the device used to control the volume would be among the most important.
Mindless
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2003
- Messages
- 1,037
- Reaction score
- 12
Yeah, I admit, it is important to have a good pot in a preamp. But still $100+ IS expensive for a pot, at least for a regular person.
ITZBITZ
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2003
- Messages
- 382
- Reaction score
- 11
Quote:
$100 for a pot is expensive and likely won't even get you in the door for a stepped attenuator. Most of them start around $149 for a quality kit using Vishay/Dale or Holco resistors. I think goldpoint has a series unit that might be $20-$30 cheaper.
I have a ladder stepped attenuator waiting to find a home in my own PPA, but I haven't had a chance to hook it up yet (argh).
Originally posted by Mindless But still $100+ IS expensive for a pot, at least for a regular person. |
$100 for a pot is expensive and likely won't even get you in the door for a stepped attenuator. Most of them start around $149 for a quality kit using Vishay/Dale or Holco resistors. I think goldpoint has a series unit that might be $20-$30 cheaper.
I have a ladder stepped attenuator waiting to find a home in my own PPA, but I haven't had a chance to hook it up yet (argh).
PinkFloyd
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2009
- Messages
- 9,511
- Reaction score
- 21
Quote:
Ouch! $149 is a load for a volume control are they really "that" much better than a good quality carbon pot?
Originally posted by ITZBITZ $100 for a pot is expensive and likely won't even get you in the door for a stepped attenuator. Most of them start around $149 for a quality kit using Vishay/Dale or Holco resistors. I think goldpoint has a series unit that might be $20-$30 cheaper. I have a ladder stepped attenuator waiting to find a home in my own PPA, but I haven't had a chance to hook it up yet (argh). |
Ouch! $149 is a load for a volume control are they really "that" much better than a good quality carbon pot?
Mastergill
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2003
- Messages
- 815
- Reaction score
- 11
Yeah!, because with a stepped attenuator you have a much much better contact. Each step provide a firm contact allowing very small signal loss if any.
With a normal pot you have a cursor running over carbon or whatever stuff, and it's easy to understand that the contact is not as good as a true 'switch'.
And also with 'true' resistors you can have a very good L/R balance.
With a normal pot you have a cursor running over carbon or whatever stuff, and it's easy to understand that the contact is not as good as a true 'switch'.
And also with 'true' resistors you can have a very good L/R balance.
ITZBITZ
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2003
- Messages
- 382
- Reaction score
- 11
Quote:
On a $150 amplifier, no. On a more expensive unit it starts to make sense the higher and higher you get. I wouldn't pay close to $1000 for an amplifier if it didn't have one.
Originally posted by PinkFloyd Ouch! $149 is a load for a volume control are they really "that" much better than a good quality carbon pot? |
On a $150 amplifier, no. On a more expensive unit it starts to make sense the higher and higher you get. I wouldn't pay close to $1000 for an amplifier if it didn't have one.
darkclouds
Particular about his Sméagol Grammar we thinks he is.
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2001
- Messages
- 1,988
- Reaction score
- 10
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2001
- Posts
- 1,988
- Likes
- 10
Quote:
You know, there aren't many amps out there for near a grand that has a stepped attenuator. As a matter of fact, I think the gilmore built by antness maybe the only one, but that's more DIY type of deal.
Originally posted by ITZBITZ On a $150 amplifier, no. On a more expensive unit it starts to make sense the higher and higher you get. I wouldn't pay close to $1000 for an amplifier if it didn't have one. |
You know, there aren't many amps out there for near a grand that has a stepped attenuator. As a matter of fact, I think the gilmore built by antness maybe the only one, but that's more DIY type of deal.
doobooloo
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2002
- Messages
- 2,544
- Reaction score
- 11
BTW, if you're willing to solder, you can get quality Elma ladder stepped attenuator kits for ~$90 through group buys such as this:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...threadid=30468
And there are some assembled ladder attenuators such as these that go for ~$50, but people have mixed results with them (but for the price, what the heck!):
http://cgi6.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dl...sort=3&rows=50
My biggest concern with pots is channel mismatch, which can be much more evident when listening through headphones than through speakers IMO, so I think a stepped attenuator is worth investing in. In my next DIY project (a really souped-up PPA) I am planning to use a quality stepped attenuator.
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...threadid=30468
And there are some assembled ladder attenuators such as these that go for ~$50, but people have mixed results with them (but for the price, what the heck!):
http://cgi6.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dl...sort=3&rows=50
My biggest concern with pots is channel mismatch, which can be much more evident when listening through headphones than through speakers IMO, so I think a stepped attenuator is worth investing in. In my next DIY project (a really souped-up PPA) I am planning to use a quality stepped attenuator.
Iron_Dreamer
Member of the Trade: HeadAmp
Landscape-Photo-Fi
Organizer for Can Jam '09
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2003
- Messages
- 9,527
- Reaction score
- 75
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2003
- Posts
- 9,527
- Likes
- 75
Quote:
I put one of his in my Gilmore, and I have no complaints, it was a definite sound qualit improvement.
Originally posted by doobooloo And there are some assembled ladder attenuators such as these that go for ~$50, but people have mixed results with them (but for the price, what the heck!): http://cgi6.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dl...sort=3&rows=50 |
I put one of his in my Gilmore, and I have no complaints, it was a definite sound qualit improvement.