At least people aren't too specific about their wants 
I'd settle for an M-scaler that doesn't need ferrites 
I'd settle for an M-scaler that doesn't need ferrites Watts Up...?
- Thread starter wink
- Start date
The Jester
1000+ Head-Fier
Depends on the depth or your pockets, MScaler switching inputs and DAC mode output to a preamp means your paying for a lot of high end stuff to simply bypass it ?
The Jester
1000+ Head-Fier
Various opinions are all valid, but there’s plenty out there with extensive vinyl collections, not to mention the current upsurge in popularity of the format that still want good digital reproduction as well, so more about appealing to as wider audience as possible than further dividing digital and analogue, there’s original analogue versions I prefer to remasters, both analogue and digital, and also digital versions I much prefer to analogue, there are those who say spending more than $xx on a DAC is a waste of money while others buy turntables that cost more than a Dave/MScaler, in the end it’s all about music and how it makes you feel.
jarnopp
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2014
- Posts
- 2,322
- Likes
- 1,656
Qutest already has a volume control, it just has only two positions. The pricing is all marketing/positioning.
uzi2
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2013
- Posts
- 1,638
- Likes
- 478
They are not volume controls, they are compatibility modes. If you choose to use Qutest with an amp, then the amp will control volume. If you choose to drive headphones directly, then you will use a software digital volume for control (eg. HQPlayer)
jarnopp
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2014
- Posts
- 2,322
- Likes
- 1,656
I understand. My point is, the voltage output is controlled by software in both Qutest and other Chord dacs. There would likely not be significant additional cost associated with adding a volume control to Qutest since the software already exists. But you can think of it as very limited position volume control. If you added 60 more “compatibility modes” you’d be there.
x RELIC x
Headphoneus Supremus
You seem to not realize that nothing is ever bypassed in Chord DACs, no matter what output you choose. There is no separate amp stage from the DAC output. The different ‘modes’ are simple digital settings for convenience. It’s not like conventional DAC/amp combo’s. No one else does it like Rob’s designs. Think of all of the different modes as listening to the line-out from the DAC. There is no waste of unused components.
The Jester
1000+ Head-Fier
Using the MScaler makes all the inputs redundant so I’m talking more about a “reference” DAC only version of the Dave, basic coloured lights for input sample rate and a simple fixed output … not one that’s capable of driving speakers as well like the Dave and TT2
Last edited:
x RELIC x
Headphoneus Supremus
You will never get something different with Rob’s designs though, because they already incorporate the simplest output from the DAC, with the bonus ability to also drive transducers without adding more output stages. It’s already a reference DAC only. Again, it’s different from everyone else’s designs.
Edit: The following is regarding the Hugo, but the basic design is the same for all his DACs.
Last edited:
x RELIC x
Headphoneus Supremus
The Jester
1000+ Head-Fier
This is more what I’m thinking:
From the first page of the new Qutest thread here …
Qutest is a UK made stand alone digital to analogue converter based on our multi award winning Hugo 2 technology ….
And
Pair Qutest with your headphone amplifier to tailor the sound to your liking, or connect to your amplifier for the purest audio experience …
And
The new Qutest greatly improves on the previous 2Qute and user comments on the forum has helped shape its development…
Looking forward is there a possibility, maybe when such a thing as “Dave 2” eventuates, or sales of Dave eventually slows as everyone who wants and can afford one, owns one, could we see a “Qutest 2” and changing the first line to “:a stand alone digital to analogue converter based on our award winning Dave technology” …
Is that clearer ?
x RELIC x
Headphoneus Supremus
I know what you are thinking, but the Qutest is already fundamentally designed the same way the DAVE is, just without the ability to control the digital volume and without a headphone jack, and less Pulse Array elements, less TAPs in the WTA filter, and a less sophisticated noise shaper on the output. The Qutest has the output stage of the Mojo and the WTA filters of the Hugo2. It’s priced for a specific market, and it’s just marketing you’re latching on to and not the engineering behind it.
The DAVE’s headphone output is the same signal path as the RCA output. There is no bypassing any hardware internally when switching modes (same with all of Chord DACs). It’s all basically a digital volume preset between modes. There would be no logic for a DAVE2 to remove anything because you can’t remove the analogue output from the DAC. If someone wanted to add an amp to the DAVE(2) it would be no different than using the Qutest in that regard, except for not having the option to digitally control the volume.
The Jester
1000+ Head-Fier
I think you’re getting there,
Not so much a “Dave2” and more the possibility of a “Qutest2” using the larger FPGA and trickle down technology from the Dave’s superior WTA, noise shaper and pulse array count, don’t get me wrong I’m extremely happy with my MScaler/Qutest combo but any further upgrade path at the moment is the TT2 or the Dave to go along with the MScaler which in my opinion is the digital “game changer”, bring out something like a “Qutest2” priced up to that of the MScaler and I’d seriously consider it as the TT2 wouldn’t be enough of a step up for the $$ and the Dave is unfortunately beyond my budget in the foreseeable future, after I auditioned the Qutest it took a few weeks to make the choice, then listening to the addition of the MScaler it was a relatively expensive “no brainer” for me at least …
Edit:
Maybe “Qutest2” is the wrong description and instead a possible addition to the TableTop range with a similar case to the TT2 and MScaler, I’d guess there’d be some out there that would consider such a product as an upgrade to a TT2/MScaler pair in a dedicated system and use the TT2 as a stand alone desktop DAC/amp/headphone amp without going all the way up to the Dave…
As you said, marketing as opposed to new technology ?
Not so much a “Dave2” and more the possibility of a “Qutest2” using the larger FPGA and trickle down technology from the Dave’s superior WTA, noise shaper and pulse array count, don’t get me wrong I’m extremely happy with my MScaler/Qutest combo but any further upgrade path at the moment is the TT2 or the Dave to go along with the MScaler which in my opinion is the digital “game changer”, bring out something like a “Qutest2” priced up to that of the MScaler and I’d seriously consider it as the TT2 wouldn’t be enough of a step up for the $$ and the Dave is unfortunately beyond my budget in the foreseeable future, after I auditioned the Qutest it took a few weeks to make the choice, then listening to the addition of the MScaler it was a relatively expensive “no brainer” for me at least …
Edit:
Maybe “Qutest2” is the wrong description and instead a possible addition to the TableTop range with a similar case to the TT2 and MScaler, I’d guess there’d be some out there that would consider such a product as an upgrade to a TT2/MScaler pair in a dedicated system and use the TT2 as a stand alone desktop DAC/amp/headphone amp without going all the way up to the Dave…
As you said, marketing as opposed to new technology ?
Last edited:
My dream is for a qutest sized upscaler. The same form factor as the rest of the qutest range.
Users who are viewing this thread
