The Jester
1000+ Head-Fier
Heat and RF shielding might be the issue with doing that ?My dream is for a qutest sized upscaler. The same form factor as the rest of the qutest range.
Heat and RF shielding might be the issue with doing that ?My dream is for a qutest sized upscaler. The same form factor as the rest of the qutest range.
It has a lot of output power and a very low output impedance (0.075 ohms), so it is in fact the best possible «headphone amp» you can get: almost zero harmonic and intermodulation distortion, extremely linear frequency response with virtually unlimited bandwidth, infinite S/N ratio – in other words: perfectly neutral and accurate. No buyable amp is capable of that. And it comes for free!
Now there are people who refuse to take advantage of this unique feature, somehow they feel the urge to add an amp to the system. Because adding an amp to a DAC is standard and makes the system look more complete or valuable. Or to color the signal to their liking or to compensate for their headphones' sonic balance.
I don't deny that you can make a headphone sound more pleasing by doing so, but you can't make it more accurate. If you demand high-end sound quality and are ready to invest thousands of $ for your headphone system for that purpose, it would be absurd to castrate your gear just to do the «usual thing». If you feel the need to change the sonic balance (which is absolutely understandable, as no headphone has a flat frequency response), don't introduce such a bunch of analogue electronics! It will only corrupt the signal. Use a software equalizer instead! Learn how to use it and get used to it! I'm sure you will get advice if you need some – like when you're seeking advice for an amp. Note that a good equalizer is much more powerful than any amp (when it comes to taylor the sound to your ears)!
How to tell they’re in the right place though, as there are a lot of inches. Is there a particular track one would use ?For loudspeakers I use 16 PTFE insulated 0.6mm OFC sliver plated solid cores - 8 red and 8 blue. They are twisted into 4, then 4 twisted again. Then put into an oven, cooked at 200 deg C for 15 minutes, then left in the oven to cool down overnight. This anneals the wire. For interconnects you are better off using 0.4mm cores.
Setting up speakers takes a great deal of time, and needs to be set-up within one inch. This was a pain with the 803 D3s considering their weight!
For loudspeakers I use 16 PTFE insulated 0.6mm OFC sliver plated solid cores - 8 red and 8 blue. They are twisted into 4, then 4 twisted again. Then put into an oven, cooked at 200 deg C for 15 minutes, then left in the oven to cool down overnight. This anneals the wire. For interconnects you are better off using 0.4mm cores.
Setting up speakers takes a great deal of time, and needs to be set-up within one inch. This was a pain with the 803 D3s considering their weight!
That's very interesting. One of the brands of IC I have been trying, with good success, has larger strands per conductor, and they have a very thin coating on them to prevent oxidation. They seem to be quite good value as I can't tell the difference between using them and a pair of $1500 (retail) cables I have here.Solid core wiring is vital for analogue, but not so for digital. The reason solid core sounds better is down to the non-linearities of each strand due to surface oxidation and other impurities; and this becomes significant at high frequencies (treble) due to skin depth, where current flows towards the surface. For small signals, the strands are partially isolated due to the oxidation; for larger signals they are not isolated. This means the impedance of the cable varies with signal levels, which upsets depth perception.
But this is not an issue for digital cables, and here you are not better off making your own, but buying quality certified cables of the correct impedance.
If you could ever provide a measured evidence of this, many controversies would be finally surpassed. Subjectively, I've always found your observations true, but this is just my single experience. This is what I hate about audio, the fact that many people measure the wrong things and nobody seems to really care about going beyond those standard insufficient measurements. We can measure gravitational waves, but for some reasons we still can't get a hold of why cables affect their signals. I wonder why we don't put the right physics to work....Solid core wiring is vital for analogue, but not so for digital. The reason solid core sounds better is down to the non-linearities of each strand due to surface oxidation and other impurities; and this becomes significant at high frequencies (treble) due to skin depth, where current flows towards the surface. For small signals, the strands are partially isolated due to the oxidation; for larger signals they are not isolated. This means the impedance of the cable varies with signal levels, which upsets depth perception.
But this is not an issue for digital cables, and here you are not better off making your own, but buying quality certified cables of the correct impedance.
I ordered ferrites (not cables) from Farnell UK in July 2018, (the order mentions "Farnell Element14" in one part but just "Farnell" elsewhere). I don't think I had to prove I was in the trade : I'm in IT with my little limited company not electronics.Does anyone have a link for me where I can order those cables internationally or even better in Germany?
I can’t find any cable that comes close to Robs description.
@Rob Watts, Do you also built your own headphone cables like that. I imagine it being very heavy and not very flexible. Or is it not so important because you don’t get massive depth on headphones either way?