Vali 2 tube rolling
Sep 8, 2019 at 8:59 AM Post #4,561 of 6,436
I do not know how the change of political leadership influences the quality of soldering; another reason that I have not mentined elswhere is that in the mid-1950ties the Soviets finally started manufacturing miniatiure tubes (noval) (they failed miserably in achieving functional quality of their own models in the late 30ties), so that their interest in the octals (and btw loctals which the Soviets adopted in 1946 - I still have to see one, as well as loctals produced by Philips and Mullard!) must have decreased in the second half of the 1950ties.

I am building some amps using 6sn7's and 6as7G's, in doing some research I can recall one engineer saying he preferred octals to miniatures because of the larger cathodes and anodes. They provide more airiness and presence in his opinion. That may well be my problem when trying to use 12At7's and such, I just prefer the octals. The amps will also run 6sl7's so a local group of friends and I may do some blind testing with those down the road as well.
 
Sep 8, 2019 at 9:19 AM Post #4,562 of 6,436
I am building some amps using 6sn7's and 6as7G's, in doing some research I can recall one engineer saying he preferred octals to miniatures because of the larger cathodes and anodes. They provide more airiness and presence in his opinion. That may well be my problem when trying to use 12At7's and such, I just prefer the octals. The amps will also run 6sl7's so a local group of friends and I may do some blind testing with those down the road as well.
Good luck. It is interesting to hear that my bias towards larger tubes is not just psychological but also has engineering justification.
 
Sep 8, 2019 at 9:31 AM Post #4,563 of 6,436
Good luck. It is interesting to hear that my bias towards larger tubes is not just psychological but also has engineering justification.

Some things were done as cost savings. Is combining triodes inside a tube and shielding them better than using two tubes? Doubtful, but it saved money and saved space.
 
Sep 8, 2019 at 10:11 AM Post #4,564 of 6,436
fascinating information. I cannot imagine they knew at the time that the tubes would still be in use thirty years later, or even sixty years.

Or more importantly, that the tubes would outlive the country.
 
Sep 8, 2019 at 10:29 AM Post #4,565 of 6,436
I do not know how the change of political leadership influences the quality of soldering; another reason that I have not mentioned elswhere is that in the mid-1950ties the Soviets finally started manufacturing miniatiure tubes (noval) (they failed miserably in achieving functional quality of their own models in the late 30ties), so that their interest in the octals (and btw loctals which the Soviets adopted in 1946 - I still have to see one, as well as loctals produced by Philips and Mullard!) must have decreased in the second half of the 1950ties.

That is really interesting. Good info! As a weird turn of events, fast forward 20 - 30 years and I have these HP's labeled as made by Amperex. They are clearly Russian made tubes, probably Reflektors with their trademark flying saucer getter. The bottle is also larger in diameter, which is normal with Soviet made 6DJ8's and 6922's. May be difficult to see in the bottom photo, but the HP/Amperex on the left is next to a true Holland made Amperex on the right. It's possible someone re-silkscreened these as an attempted fraud, but I don't think so -- the ink is very fragile and chalky and is true to the ink make-up used back in the 60's/70's (and even prior).


Amp1.jpg
Amp2.jpg
Amp3.jpg
 
Sep 8, 2019 at 10:39 AM Post #4,566 of 6,436
That is really interesting. Good info! As a weird turn of events, fast forward 20 - 30 years and I have these HP's labeled as made by Amperex. They are clearly Russian made tubes, probably Reflektors with their trademark flying saucer getter. The bottle is also larger in diameter, which is normal with Soviet made 6DJ8's and 6922's. May be difficult to see in the bottom photo, but the HP/Amperex on the left is next to a true Holland made Amperex on the right. It's possible someone re-silkscreened these as an attempted fraud, but I don't think so -- the ink is very fragile and chalky and is true to the ink make-up used back in the 60's/70's (and even prior).



Think the double post getter was used in later tubes, I have read about Russian tubes relabled as Amperex/Philips. Not sure if HP would source Russian tubes during the Cold War.
BTW that bad tube is my avatar, display tube online and in person.
 
Last edited:
Sep 8, 2019 at 10:48 AM Post #4,567 of 6,436
Think the double post getter was used in later tubes, I have read about Russian tubes relabled as Amperex/Philips. Not sure if HP would source Russian tubes during the Cold War.

That makes sense. But if I were going to go to the trouble of relabeling something, I'd relabel it for something with a more highly perceived value. Why label it as an HP rather than just an Amperex? Can't ever know for sure what transpired with these, but it's a good subject for a new Nancy Drew novel. :relaxed:

BTW that bad tube is my avatar, display tube online and in person.

So then what you're saying is you have a bad avatar? :stuck_out_tongue:
 
Sep 8, 2019 at 10:54 AM Post #4,568 of 6,436
No
That makes sense. But if I were going to go to the trouble of relabeling something, I'd relabel it for something with a more highly perceived value. Why label it as an HP rather than just an Amperex? Can't ever know for sure what transpired with these, but it's a good subject for a new Nancy Drew novel. :relaxed:



So then what you're saying is you have a bad avatar? :stuck_out_tongue:
No, avatar is extremely unbalanced and makes web browsers very noisy/micro. I can see my desk tip slightly downward with the 3x as strong Gm triode. 510 Gm on my hickok is easily the worst testing. Highest probability of getting bad tubes for me is ECC82 from Europe and Brent Jessee.
 
Sep 8, 2019 at 11:05 AM Post #4,569 of 6,436
One final time-- I don't think the death of Stalin has anything to do with the quality-performance and degradation of vacuum tube solder over the years. The initial post was about the differences between 1953 vs. 1958 Fotons.

Unlike Western Democracy, which turns over leadership on a regular two-four year cycle, the CCCP had a "strong man" leader, who died. I would be interested also in the changes within the Soviet Industry after his death.
ODD mentioned the Collective Agriculture emphasis, but in my opinion- the Cold War loomed large during the 1950s--so emphasis Military was still quite strong.
Were many of these vacuum tubes intended for the early electronic computers? Yes. One early Soviet computer reported used 10,000 tubes. I will also assert that workers in a Sylvania tube factory probably never anticipated that their tubes would be still working in the 21st Century.
 
Sep 8, 2019 at 11:16 AM Post #4,570 of 6,436
I will also assert that workers in a Sylvania tube factory probably never anticipated that their tubes would be still working in the 21st Century.

Do you think the workers in a Sylvania tube factory ever anticipated anything about the tubes they were making, other than if they did their jobs to the expectation(s) required they got a paycheck?
 
Sep 8, 2019 at 11:18 AM Post #4,571 of 6,436
I don't think the death of Stalin has anything to do with the quality-performance and degradation of vacuum tube solder over the years.

Oh. I thought you did. :ksc75smile: That's unfortunate. I liked the idea: the Great Leader conks out, workers no longer afraid, stop giving a schiit about soldering as Gulag no longer looming... Here go the Fotons, and now we all have to suck the bad solder.
 
Sep 8, 2019 at 11:28 AM Post #4,572 of 6,436
Think the double post getter was used in later tubes, I have read about Russian tubes relabled as Amperex/Philips. Not sure if HP would source Russian tubes during the Cold War.
BTW that bad tube is my avatar, display tube online and in person.
That's interesting. It has not been forbiden to buy the Soviet (or Warsaw Pact countries) tubes in the West during the Cold War - they were excessively taxed to discourage such practice. Enter grey importers as Zaerix UK. I have a pair of Zaerix branded 6J5GT sold as AEG Telefunken, with the Bundeswehr quality acceptance mark etched on the glass, but oh that flying saucer...
 
Last edited:
Sep 8, 2019 at 11:47 AM Post #4,573 of 6,436
Sep 8, 2019 at 12:01 PM Post #4,574 of 6,436
Hey!!!! These things aren't half bad! But that's just an alternative way of saying they aren't half good. If you've ever wondered whether Neil Young could be an ear bleeder via a lossy MP3, you need wonder no longer. :slight_smile: Let's just say that we've come a long, long way with headphones since the time these might have been considered decent.


What is your fascination with electronics ending in 'UNE'? Is there some hidden message to Amazon with the A-Z? :confused:
 
Sep 8, 2019 at 12:36 PM Post #4,575 of 6,436
Oh. I thought you did. :ksc75smile: That's unfortunate. I liked the idea: the Great Leader conks out, workers no longer afraid, stop giving a schiit about soldering as Gulag no longer looming... Here go the Fotons, and now we all have to suck the bad solder.
Well, The only real significant event in 1953 was Uncle Joe kicking the bucket, which may have directly caused poor Soldering skills...Let's wait until those memos are declassified:cry::money_mouth:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top