fishski13
Member of the Trade: SolderWorksAudio
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2004
- Posts
- 1,908
- Likes
- 40
Quote:
yes, i should have mentioned head-fi too.
i agree, the content of the review was pretty lame - i would have liked to have seen a more in-depth WP review instead - but he did gush all over the HP. headphones have largely been ingnored in the past by the hi-fi mags, so any positive review that comes from one, especially one as recognized as Stereophile, i think carries some weight. oddly enough, i own two products that JM likes: BM DAC1 and PL2500.
PACE
Originally Posted by Sovkiller /img/forum/go_quote.gif What???? Please do not underestimate the power of headfi, eh? How about this thread to begin with??? This review is IMVPO (which nobody had to agree with BTW) non very inspiring at all, and the information given there is IMO really poor, and using the same waffle we can read about any heapdhone in any place, just replace the name of Editon 9 by any other, and you will see that besides the particular specs, and S-logic reference, the same verbiage could be used to describe any other sound of any other headphone, and could be applied to any model/manufacturer the same way. IMO and definitelly one of the worst I have read published in one specialized magazine of the caliber of Stereophile, in honor of the truth, just compare it to any of markl's reviews, about any gear, just to mention one of the many we have here, and you will see the difference... |
yes, i should have mentioned head-fi too.
i agree, the content of the review was pretty lame - i would have liked to have seen a more in-depth WP review instead - but he did gush all over the HP. headphones have largely been ingnored in the past by the hi-fi mags, so any positive review that comes from one, especially one as recognized as Stereophile, i think carries some weight. oddly enough, i own two products that JM likes: BM DAC1 and PL2500.
PACE