- Nov 28, 2015
So true what you say about successor vs previous, many many reviewers are like this. And I always wonder, why they didn't point those "defects" on the original review??
On one side I agree: the IE 800 had the same exact issues but it wasn't pointed out in it's review.
On the other side I don't: If it was such a prevalent issue on the previous version, then wouldn't it only be logical for Sennhieser to just fix it? It only makes sense to point out the issue more on the second revision.
Still more of the reviewers fault for keeping the reviews all equal regardless of timeline.