Towert7
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2005
- Posts
- 5,853
- Likes
- 38
Quote:
I don't know about other people, but I would consider those 100% crops to be on the soft side.
This is what I would consider pretty good for a DX format picture at 100% crop. No sharpening has been done to either.
or
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2009/...a3b86542_o.jpg
I also would much rather have my camera set to a sharpness of +2 instead of -2. You can always soften up detail, but to try and sharpen up what is already blurred does not work very good. That's at least what I have found.
Originally Posted by dj_mocok /img/forum/go_quote.gif As you can see, it still makes up enough detail. So either my standard of sharp is much lower than you, or maybe either your object (or you) moved, or you just simply got a bad copy. |
I don't know about other people, but I would consider those 100% crops to be on the soft side.
This is what I would consider pretty good for a DX format picture at 100% crop. No sharpening has been done to either.
or
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2009/...a3b86542_o.jpg
I also would much rather have my camera set to a sharpness of +2 instead of -2. You can always soften up detail, but to try and sharpen up what is already blurred does not work very good. That's at least what I have found.