The LD MKIII, well broken in
Aug 15, 2007 at 2:07 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 20

Negatron

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Aug 5, 2006
Posts
422
Likes
16
As I mentioned when I wrote my initial MKIII impressions as it was breaking in, I would post a follow up if I could get motivated. Well, listening to this amp after a thorough break in is certainly motivation to sing it's praise, but it is just too easy to sit back and listen and get nothing written. Getting lost within music can be rather narcotic at times.

I find the MKIII to be a good looking amp, being neither modern or 'retro', It has it's own identity. The construction is well thought out and the circuitry is very well executed in the design philosophy it follows. There is skillful use of modern components but no 'new' tricks, no revolutionary way to refine tube design. This amp follows the school of Herman Hosmer Scott rather than Avery Fisher.

The component count is minimal, the signal path straight forward and short. The design uses no trimming of wave form or corrective tricks. The output is Single Ended Push Pull, or SEPP. A design presented by Julius Futterman in 1954 and finally put into commercial production by Harvey Rosenberg.. OTL designs are neither inferior or superior to transformer coupling but are certainly more difficult to execute. Although if you have ever heard an NYAL Futterman through ESL's or Maggies it will be etched into your memory forever.

The heart of the amp, where the output starts, is a power supply consisting of an tordial transformer filtered by 3, 330uf 250v Nichicon low ESR caps in a c-r-c network. It is a very low impedance supply for a tube amp and allows for very well controlled low bass response. I might add that with all that capacitance, the amp is dead silent when it is turned on or off.

The bass response of the MKIII is quite more than I would expect from an headphone amp, it remains controlled well into the lowest registers. There is bass and then, there is bass that you are surprised by. Bass is reputed to be the domain of solid state amps and for tight, hard hitting bass that is sometimes the case. I'm using an pair of DT-770's lightly damped with BlueTac to evaluate bass response in my own designs or anything else. This amp surprised me after it broke in. Low bass is very impactful, yet does not mask any low level detail that is happening at the same time. You can readily pick apart each individual sound. That is an area where many amps struggle.

I can't stress break-in enough, before the amp has fully settled in, say around 100 hours, you will be impressed with the midrange, typical good tube. Glorious, liquid, detailed. it is invisible in the way it wraps itself around you. You tend to overlook the edge on the lower mids, the loss of control in the bass that will be there before it settles in. The highs are a bit edgy and the very top can be hard as well, before the amp gets it's stride. But smooth out the top does. And it does it very well indeed, inner detail is present the further in you listen. It can be like Ansel Adams photography, not the prints in books but the actual prints, for those of you lucky enough to have seen any of them. There are shadows within shadows, and within those shadows are yet more shadows with greater detail. It's spooky.

The illusion of 3 dimensional space or soundstage is presented in a well broken in MKIII with tight spatial detail. When you pin point an instrument it stays there, it does not wander as it will with many amps. I'm not quite used to the finite dimensions of Head-fi yet but am thrilled with the lack of having to deal with a listening room.

The stage has width wider than the instruments and the ambiance decays as it should. The depth is not as deep as I would expect, but it falls back well behind the front of the presentation. The height has a ceiling, I have the feeling when listening to live music and acoustical instruments that I am in a club with a low ceiling but all the ambiance of the recording is there. If the recording was made in a club with a 12 foot ceiling the ambiance is presented as such. It's hard to explain, but it is intimate.

You can feel the layers within the harmony, the layers separated by air and you can hear the pressure variance as fingers squeak across strings of guitar. You can hear the amps used in the music, which ones are rolled off, which distort too hard. Kick drum attack is very defined, you can easily tell when the skin is tighter and catch the more resonant but shorter decay when a bit stretched at the end of a set. You are listening not just to the individual instruments but how they are tuned. It's Fun.

The ability of the amp to present very low level detail is as good as I have heard from a majority I have listened to. The silence is that, silence. Not that great a trick, but it appears that quietest whisper can be heard behind the music if it was recorded to begin with. I attribute this to the amps minimalist amplifier design. It resolves very well. It will not fix a source that is bad, or make a recording that was poorly mixed with second rate gear sound good because this is a tube amp. It is not euphonic, it is very revealing.

It's hard to evaluate things like this. It is way too easy to get pulled into the music and just take a mental vacation for awhile. This is the kind of gear that has a habit of just going away. I'm not reminded from time to time that I am listening to an amp, it is just me and the music. When the disc is over I pop another one in by rote and keep on being detached. I like electronics that don't intrude.

Do not mistake my enthusiasm, the amp is not perfect, and there is room for improvement, but the company had to meet a price point and this is what makes this amp shine. The choice made with components used and how they ended up voiced is exceptional. There is a synergy between mid-priced components used in the amp that bring out nuance in the music that you would not expect in an amp in this price range. Do I lust after Some of Ray Samuals upper teir stuff? You bet I do. Mikhails? Oh yeh. But am I happy with this amplifier? In a word yes. It's a keeper.

For those interested, the sources for my comments have been an California Audio Labs Delta transport and Sigma DAC, Heart 5000 Tube CD player, which is based on the Marantz 5000, a Theta Cobalt DAC, a LiTe DAC AH modded passive out.
The two SS DACS are used to keep me from becoming too tube biased.
wink.gif
(Are 8 paralelled 1543's, passive output a non state, rather than solid state?)

CD's used for notes taking were:
Chris Rea, The Road to Hell
The Knotting Hillbillies, Missing (Knopfler & friends)
Dire Straits, Love Over Gold
Enya, Shepard Moons
Tangerine Dream, Poland

Phones used were K-501's, modded DT-770's & borrowed Senn 600's
 
Aug 15, 2007 at 2:15 AM Post #2 of 20
Sorry, but why not call it a Little Dot MKIII ??

MKIII is ambiguous thx.
 
Aug 15, 2007 at 2:35 AM Post #4 of 20
Quote:

Originally Posted by thread /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Sorry, but why not call it a Little Dot MKIII ??
MKIII is ambiguous thx.



Thanks for pointing it out. Frequently, clarity is not my strong point.
 
Aug 15, 2007 at 3:41 AM Post #6 of 20
Quote:

Originally Posted by musicmind /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Very nicely written detailed review Negatron, thanks very much for posting your impressions. I'm curious how close it would sound to the MKIV.


I'm going to find out. I am going to sell one of my old McIntosh amps and get an MKIV SE. Who says this hobby has any involvrment whatsoever to a sane and practical outlook?
 
Aug 15, 2007 at 2:39 PM Post #7 of 20
I wonder if anyone has compared the LD MkIII or MkIV to the Dared MP-5?

If so, I would be interested in the comparisions.
 
Aug 15, 2007 at 2:48 PM Post #8 of 20
Wonderful review, Negatron! The review seems professionally written and done with every bit of details and accurate head-fi vocabulary as I'd like it to be!

What I find is that the LD MKIII is a true representation of a good amp, reflecting the performance of the DAC and cables in one's music link. In other words, better amp = upgratitis.
very_evil_smiley.gif
If you're using your MKIII through your computer, I strongly recommend upgrading your source as you'd defnitely notice a difference in the overall performance.
 
Aug 16, 2007 at 8:08 AM Post #9 of 20
Quote:

Originally Posted by HiFlight /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I wonder if anyone has compared the LD MkIII or MkIV to the Dared MP-5?

If so, I would be interested in the comparisions.



Thanks very much Negatron, I think many people would find your MKIII vs MKIV comparisons very useful.
I'll also second HiFlights question about the Dared MP-5.

BTW, penguindude, you also posted a very nice review on your website which was very informative.

Thanks again
 
Aug 19, 2007 at 4:01 AM Post #11 of 20
Quote:

Originally Posted by colonelkernel8 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Right now, (I just got my MKIII), it sounds fine except its really, "tinny" and really harsh to listen to. Almost no bass. It does have great detail though. I hope the "tinny"ness will drastically decrease with burn in.


What you are hearing is typical of the amp in it's first hours. The harshness is due to the high voltage electrolytic capacitors chosen for the amp. The sound of the caps when broken in, are remarkable in that circuit, but they have 'growing pains'. You may want to read the initial impressions posted about a new MKIII, which mention the quirk and goes on to detail some of the the progression of the amp.

http://www.head-fi.org/forums/showthread.php?t=252573

You are by no means alone, there have been a number of posts about the same thing. Just hang in there, you are going to be rewarded with an incredibly detailed and smooth sounding amplifier.
 
Aug 22, 2007 at 2:09 AM Post #12 of 20
Hmm, still no bass, but the right channel seems to be breaking in faster than the left; it is "warmer". The right tube is also the first to "heat up" or glow, it also glows brighter than the left, not sure if that means anything. I guess I'm only about 10 hours in. Its not as congested or "tinny" anymore, but no bass. Its as if someone took an imaginary "bass" eq knob and turned it almost all the way down. To the point where there is no impact, and the sound as a whole isnt as up front.
 
Aug 22, 2007 at 11:24 AM Post #13 of 20
Negatron: i enjoy reading your review very much
cool.gif
i wonder if u can put all your review about the mkiii, your initial impression when u first got it and after broken in, tips on trouble shooting the amp into one thread, that any1 who's new to this can just look into one single thread and read all your great review at once
3000smile.gif
 
Aug 22, 2007 at 2:31 PM Post #14 of 20
Quote:

Originally Posted by colonelkernel8 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Hmm, still no bass, but the right channel seems to be breaking in faster than the left; it is "warmer". The right tube is also the first to "heat up" or glow, it also glows brighter than the left, not sure if that means anything. I guess I'm only about 10 hours in. Its not as congested or "tinny" anymore, but no bass. Its as if someone took an imaginary "bass" eq knob and turned it almost all the way down. To the point where there is no impact, and the sound as a whole isnt as up front.


I have the HD595 and MKIII combo as well. My headphones were purchased used had a few hundred hours burn in when I got them, the amp was brand new.

My impressions with the MKIII:

First 15 Hours - Not impressed really at all, sounded very cold and uninspired.

Hours 15-75 - Kept getting better and better, everytime i turned it on, i would appreciate the sound more and more. The mids filled out, as did the low end a bit. I kept saying "Wow. I don't remember it sounding this good last time", it happened over and over. At the end of 75 or so hours, the sound was VERY full, crisp highs, liquidy mids, and decent bass, but a bit less than i prefer. It sounded good, don't get me wrong, just a bit top heavy for my taste.

From what I could tell and read, the 5654 driver tubes are more analytical than low so after about 75 hours I rolled in my Mullard NOS EF92's. (got em on eBay for around $15 shipped)

OH MY LORD - EXACTLY WHAT I NEEDED

Even after 10 hours burnt in on the EF92's, i could tell it hit the spot for me. There was a deeper presence in the sound now, the bass was low, very low, and much more apparent.

I'm now on about hour 50-75 with the EF92's and it sounds AWESOME. The highs arent' as bright as the 5654, mids are pure liquid, and the bass, well it rocks (sounds AWESOME on nearly everything). From Jazz to Rock to Classical to Pop, it all sounds exactly like I wanted it to.


Personally, in your case, I would give it more time. It really does take awhile for everything to burn in properly. I never would have believed had I not heard it for myself. And if you really want more bass, grab some EF92's, the difference is noticeable and well worth it IMO.
 
Aug 23, 2007 at 9:08 PM Post #15 of 20
Those were nice comments on the breakin Aphexii, I hope it's helping the Colonel get through the awkward 'break-in blues'. (300 hours people) Minivan, thanks for the suggestion regarding an organizing of MKIII & MKIV info, it's in the works, and Musicmind, I want to especially thank you for giving me an excuse to buy a MKIV, that way it's not 'upgratitis', it's 'Science'.

Meanwhile, a lot of things have been covered on the MKIII and IV on other threads and a search of the two should yield some answers and for those owners of the MKIII-IV Amps, kick into this thread for the benefit of new owners.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top