activatorfly
Headphoneus Supremus
Anticipation for the GK10 is at fever pitch!
Last edited:
I love a strong bass, but I definitely agree that it needs to be accurate and it can be quite challenging in single DD sets to balance a strong bass gain with clean mids and treble response. Definitely not something that shows up in a standard FR graph, unfortunately.Daccord!.....The nuances / micro details / "air" in genres like: electronica, jazz, classical, female vocals, binaural soundscapes etc....would imafo be totally subsumed by a basshead set.....
Thank you for the trust. I don't like to recommend bad sounding IEMs to others haha.I trust your ears, so they must be something very special.
I don't perceive them as basshead IEMs as they still have clear midrange albeit with slightly reduced presence and moderately bright & airy treble. Sounds very good with female pop music.Cappuccino says they are bass heavy. Basshead IEM's. Is this how you perceive them? I dispelled with the IE300, even though they had a very close sound sig to my preference, because they were a bit too bass heavy for me. I like fast, nimble resolving bass, because I listen to a lot of metal, jazz, and classic rock, where I want to hear the details in the bass, but with some weight, but not THUMP THUMP THUMP. FWOOMP FWOOMP. Hip hop, electronica, and pop are not typically on the menu (though they can be depending on my mood).
I will let you know.it's a bit unusual, but I like it,
I can definitely agree that it's a bit unusual, but that's nothing new to my musical preferences. I'm not a particular fan of their use of vocal fry and growl, but that's nothing against the artist or genre, just my own preferences. I typically prefer the more overtly 'musical' vocals. Regardless, that track has some interesting ethereal sounds in the opening that transition swiftly into a solid drum track. Very high pace drumming with multiple time signatures. Very cool. I do like whatever the high pitch instrumentation is that comes in around 2:15 in. It adds a nice counterpoint to the baseline.it's a bit unusual, but I like it,
Yeah, I would expect that to be the case. If I remember correctly, you can effectively tune most of that breakup out with really careful enclosure designs to provide some forward resonance chamber pressure on the driver, but I don't recall the actual measures that it requires. It's a bit of an unusual thing to try to push large dome tweeters above 20kHz anyway, since they tend to localize pretty badly at that point. My favorite tweeter design if you're aiming to use a decently large diaphragm for UHF extension is the dual ring radiator silk tweeter design. Vifa made great use of those, though their actual popularity in production speakers is sadly quite low. I'd love to see someone try to adapt that driver design into something usable in IEMs, as they had fantastic dispersion and could typically safely play much lower than their dome counterparts.I've always wondered if sub 16mm DDs suffer membrane breakup at audible frequencies.
Apparently it's completely normal for 1" aluminum dome tweeters to breakup above 25kHz, even sub $20 ones.
ooh, thank you so much,I can definitely agree that it's a bit unusual, but that's nothing new to my musical preferences. I'm not a particular fan of their use of vocal fry and growl, but that's nothing against the artist or genre, just my own preferences. I typically prefer the more overtly 'musical' vocals. Regardless, that track has some interesting ethereal sounds in the opening that transition swiftly into a solid drum track. Very high pace drumming with multiple time signatures. Very cool. I do like whatever the high pitch instrumentation is that comes in around 2:15 in. It adds a nice counterpoint to the baseline.
Given that metal has never really been my genre of choice, a fairly interesting song with some technical prowess behind it.
I really appreciate when people rec songs, even those outside of my usual genre preferences. You never know when a particular song will tickle your fancy and worm it's way into your list of favorite songs. It's why I try to listen to at least a small section of the songs people rec. And if they point to a favorite section to listen to for some reason, I make sure to catch that part.
As far as my understanding goes. In loudspeaker world. You have to go at least 3 way because the midrange and tweeter would bottom out if you force them to play too low, and the woofer and the midrange would breakup and beam if forced to play too high.Yeah, I would expect that to be the case. If I remember correctly, you can effectively tune most of that breakup out with really careful enclosure designs to provide some forward resonance chamber pressure on the driver, but I don't recall the actual measures that it requires. It's a bit of an unusual thing to try to push large dome tweeters above 20kHz anyway, since they tend to localize pretty badly at that point. My favorite tweeter design if you're aiming to use a decently large diaphragm for UHF extension is the dual ring radiator silk tweeter design. Vifa made great use of those, though their actual popularity in production speakers is sadly quite low. I'd love to see someone try to adapt that driver design into something usable in IEMs, as they had fantastic dispersion and could typically safely play much lower than their dome counterparts.
The shockingly deep bass of the strings in Erin, coupled with the muted cymbal crash with a nice decay and the drums sounds fantastic. The evolution to including electric guitar is nice as well. A wonderful song to chill to. I really like the string bending effect. Definitely added to my YouTube Music library for future enjoyment.ooh, thank you so much,
let me introduce you to this:
*tidal/deezer
I hope you like it,
Yeah, dynamic driver implementation in IEMs is somehow a lot more challenging than you would expect. I've dug through quite a lot of the raw drivers on AE and they always seem to struggle to produce a workable full range FR, usually with an unpleasant breakup above 8kHz, though a lot of that can probably be attributed to harmonic weirdness with the measuring transducer, since it's pretty impossible to measure IEM drivers in open space like you would standard loudspeaker drivers, so you get more auditory transducer coupling compared to when you measure loudspeakers.As far as my understanding goes. In loudspeaker world. You have to go at least 3 way because the midrange and tweeter would bottom out if you force them to play too low, and the woofer and the midrange would breakup and beam if forced to play too high.
I don't think IEMs face ANY of these issues whatsoever due to their size being smaller than a tweeter, while also having to pressurize an extremely small volume.
So id like to think that making a TOTL IEM should be trivial compared to a TOTL loudspeaker system... Yet somehow isn't.
I like this comment. It makes me reflect on my own audio journey vis-à-vis head fi.I hope you'll be more aware of what effect that 500+ Head-Fier title under your name can have on new members
I really like the vocals in the IT01X - very good midrange.No to ruszamy! Nie daj się łatwo zaimponować IEM w tym przedziale cenowym (100-150 USD) aż do IT01X. W tym przedziale cenowym. wyjątkowo trudno jest znaleźć jakiekolwiek wzorcowe IEM. Wszyscy znamy od 150 USD, śmiało można wymienić np. NM2+, H40 itp. iBasso przybił to tym wydawnictwem. Znakomity.
Recenzja iBasso IT01X
[DOŁĄCZ=pełne]3914320[/DOŁĄCZ]
Agreed. I really like how IT01X has ample sub-bass presence but not overpowering the midrange and treble. This is a winner as in this price range, it is almost impossible to find that kind of balance. Highly recommended.I really like the vocals in the IT01X - very good midrange.
great review,Here we go! Don't get impressed easily by IEMs in this price range (100-150 USD) until the IT01X. In this price range. it is exceptionally hard to find any benchmark IEMs. We all know from 150 USD, one can easily name the likes of NM2+, H40, etc. iBasso nailed it with this release. Brilliant.
iBasso IT01X Review