Kubernetes
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2001
- Posts
- 372
- Likes
- 10
Many of you may remember a recent debate between Mike Walker and others on this board about the subject of burn-in of headphones. IIRC, Walker was contending that "burn-in" was really just our brains/ears becoming accustomed to the sound and that our auditory memory is too poor to perceive real differences after a period of days.
I've been skeptical in the past too. But not anymore.
Proof: Burning in my new Audio Technica W100.
Equipment: W100, EMP, Cal Delta Transport, Cal Gamma DAC
The Test: My test track was the Flaming Lips' "A Spoonful Weighs a Ton" off their Soft Bulletin Album. Around the 1:25 mark a very heavy, very low bass line enters(not sure if it's synthesized or not).
On my first run (just after purchase) listening to the track, the bass line pure distortion -- I mean real sonic mash, as in like bad buzzing. I played it several times over, and same result.
On second listen (no changes to equipment or volume level), after about 48 hours of burn in, that bass line now sounds right and is clearly resolved. No buzzing, no sonic mash, no distortion.
So what does this prove? It proves that a headphone's sound changes over time. If Mike Walker's objection was over things like timbral fidelity or subtle changes in sound, he might have a point (in that human ears might be too crude to distinguish such differences). But this was night and day, the difference between musical bass and a sputtering mack truck engine. No one can convince me that my mind is simply fooling me here!
Burn-in: CONFIRMED!
I've been skeptical in the past too. But not anymore.
Proof: Burning in my new Audio Technica W100.
Equipment: W100, EMP, Cal Delta Transport, Cal Gamma DAC
The Test: My test track was the Flaming Lips' "A Spoonful Weighs a Ton" off their Soft Bulletin Album. Around the 1:25 mark a very heavy, very low bass line enters(not sure if it's synthesized or not).
On my first run (just after purchase) listening to the track, the bass line pure distortion -- I mean real sonic mash, as in like bad buzzing. I played it several times over, and same result.
On second listen (no changes to equipment or volume level), after about 48 hours of burn in, that bass line now sounds right and is clearly resolved. No buzzing, no sonic mash, no distortion.
So what does this prove? It proves that a headphone's sound changes over time. If Mike Walker's objection was over things like timbral fidelity or subtle changes in sound, he might have a point (in that human ears might be too crude to distinguish such differences). But this was night and day, the difference between musical bass and a sputtering mack truck engine. No one can convince me that my mind is simply fooling me here!
Burn-in: CONFIRMED!