sK0pe
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2016
- Posts
- 22
- Likes
- 19
I don't know personally, I really like my combo of DT880 + HE 400i to do all the things that are required by headphones. The 650s were terrible in comparison super bloaty. If I want clean, detailed and bass i grab for the 400i. When I need more positional audio and songs with great treble extension I grab the 880s. The 880s are also great for imaging and sound stage.
The reason so many people have bough 6x0 is they are so over hyped out of every audiophile headphone. Plus they're the closest you can get to consumer retail headphones. My parents can't tell the difference between the 880 the 400i, so give the the 6x0, they're not going to be able to tell the difference, it also avoids having to listen for any treble extension which most headphones won't reveal. The sharp drop off turned me off of the 6x0 range completely. The only headphones from the Sennheiser range I would consider owning after auditioning the 500 range to 800 range is the HD 600, but I don't because the HE400i exists. Plus I have DT880s for everything else. The HD 650 for mid and low bass just seem flabby when compared to planar bass.
If you want actual accurate bass you need to own a set of planars to complement your dynamics.
The 880s do have bass unlike what almost everyone seems to imply on these forums, it's just a different signature. I can sit and listen to NWA completely happy on either headphone. Of course for different reasons. If I feel as if a song seems to be particularly a party song I switch to another headphone and pick up everything missing in the other headphone.
The only point when I see a major difference out of this type of combo (mid-fi dynamic + mid-fi planar) is getting something hiifi like the DT1990 / Amiron / T1 / Audeze / Hifiman Edition X.
It's hilarious reading descriptions of sibilance in the 400i thread though.
Anyhow don't think this is just Sennheiser bashing, more that people should be aware of headphones outside of the HD6x0 which frankly match and outperform them at various points and don't need the excuse of "oh you need to power them because they scale with power so buy a $1500 amp".
The reason so many people have bough 6x0 is they are so over hyped out of every audiophile headphone. Plus they're the closest you can get to consumer retail headphones. My parents can't tell the difference between the 880 the 400i, so give the the 6x0, they're not going to be able to tell the difference, it also avoids having to listen for any treble extension which most headphones won't reveal. The sharp drop off turned me off of the 6x0 range completely. The only headphones from the Sennheiser range I would consider owning after auditioning the 500 range to 800 range is the HD 600, but I don't because the HE400i exists. Plus I have DT880s for everything else. The HD 650 for mid and low bass just seem flabby when compared to planar bass.
If you want actual accurate bass you need to own a set of planars to complement your dynamics.
The 880s do have bass unlike what almost everyone seems to imply on these forums, it's just a different signature. I can sit and listen to NWA completely happy on either headphone. Of course for different reasons. If I feel as if a song seems to be particularly a party song I switch to another headphone and pick up everything missing in the other headphone.
The only point when I see a major difference out of this type of combo (mid-fi dynamic + mid-fi planar) is getting something hiifi like the DT1990 / Amiron / T1 / Audeze / Hifiman Edition X.
It's hilarious reading descriptions of sibilance in the 400i thread though.
Anyhow don't think this is just Sennheiser bashing, more that people should be aware of headphones outside of the HD6x0 which frankly match and outperform them at various points and don't need the excuse of "oh you need to power them because they scale with power so buy a $1500 amp".