Achlys
Head-Fier
Etymotic ER2SE runs circles around DT880 in tonality and technicalities
That's some collection of headphones. The Sennheiser HD540 Gold is a headphone I've wondered about for quite a while. My early HD580 (flat plate) from around 1993 has an exquisite 'golden' sort of treble that I find addictive. Must try one of those and a Reference 600Ω one day. Anyway don't want to go off topic from the theme here of the hard to drive Beyerdynamic DT 880 (250Ω and 600Ω).To be honist, I don’t know. I have not listened to them yet…. My dear old dad owns way to many headphones. Maybe he has one packed away someplace.... I should ask him
PS, that’s me trying his headphones…
PPS... he has about twice the number of headphones on this photo![]()
As I said, I heard the distortion before, but I thought it was the "resolving" capabilities of these headphones that many gush over. These headphones are anything but resolving.First that Achlys said he loved the DT880, but it’s only after he read the measurements that he heard the distortion. Obvious ASR troll.
If the headphone can't keep up with the music it's distorting...transient response is useless…music is useless?…![]()
No because they don't measure the same in distortion...Yeah, it’s best to ignore him. If someone would post a graph of an LCD 2 having the same fr response as the DT880, he would hear them as sounding the same.
That’s the type of minion of that borked measurements site you’re dealing with.
I wish I had a pound for every time someone wrote 'it's subjective'. Many years ago I wrote on a thread that dropped like a rock through headfi:It's all subjective. Think about it for a second, everything is subjective, especially audio and sound.
But have you started disliking it, just after you’ve seen the distortion measurements of this headphone, or before you saw the measurements?I wish I had a pound for every time someone wrote 'it's subjective'. Many years ago I wrote on a thread that dropped like a rock through headfi:
3. The myth that audio sound quality is purely subjective
Just because a person likes a contortion of a recording doesn't mean an accurate representation of the recording (that the person won't like) is lower quality. Sound quality is sound quality, it's determined by the audio chain and not the listener.
I suppose it depends what type of audiophile you are. One whom SQ and accuracy is paramount (minority) or one whom SQ and accuracy isn't (majority). I'm a little like Achlys in that I liked this headphone and now I'm not so fond of it. I suspect many of the latter would reject the DT 880, but it doesn't quite satisfy the former either. Interesting headphone.
I fell into that trap 600Ω > 250Ω so it must be better. I wish I had the lower impedance one now. There were loads of 250Ω for sale and I was looking for the rarer 600Ω. Another mistake was not realising how insensitive this headphone was. Wrong again I'm afraid. The 32Ω doesn't get as much love as many people have these high output impedance (OTL) amplifiers that don't like low impedance headphones. With less turns of wire they might give rougher sound compared to the higher impedance. There saving grace of course is they can easily be driven from mobiles, media players, low power amplifiers.Curious why nobody ever speaks about the 32-ohm version, is it that much worse, or is it just audiophiles like bigger ohm headphones just because?
It was before, I guess I'm just not a bright sort of headphone person. I don't want to EQ either. I used to think headphones were so simple years ago and now I've finally realised how intricate and complex they are and just about every assertion ends up being wrong somehow. I have a sort of grudging admiration for Beyerdynamic and in some ways I am surprised so many do seem to genuinely like their DT 880 versions with the phenomenally successful HD650 which kind of mirror each other. It's got a certain kind of style.But have you started disliking it, just after you’ve seen the distortion measurements of this headphone, or before you saw the measurements?
The 32 ohm has the least bass distortion. It's the best version by far.I might just be a pleb with the 32 ohm version, but they sound pretty good to me, bass distortion or notDirect out of my dap/laptop, too.
Curious why nobody ever speaks about the 32-ohm version, is it that much worse, or is it just audiophiles like bigger ohm headphones just because?
That is the first time I have heard that assertion. Please provide supporting links to assuage my cognitive dissonance.The 32 ohm has the least bass distortion. It's the best version by far.