takato14
Headphoneus Supremus
Wow, never have heard about it being dark
Dark meaning overall tonal balance. The DT48 has good treble extension, but it's shelved relative to the midrange. It's not a major coloration.
Wow, never have heard about it being dark
Dark meaning overall tonal balance. The DT48 has good treble extension, but it's shelved relative to the midrange. It's not a major coloration.
Dark meaning overall tonal balance. The DT48 has good treble extension, but it's shelved relative to the midrange. It's not a major coloration.
Thats OK with me. As long as the treble is there. I hope the praise for this HP is not overhyped, like in other threads. Comparing with the hi-end headphones, even electrostats - I feel a little bit skeptical about it, but who knows, maybe DT48 really is capable headphones.
At least, hype about Etymotic ER4 wasn't groundless. It's a matter of fact whether you can have synergy with it or not
Are you kidding me? The ER-4 absolutely slaughters the DT48 in linearity and clarity. The DT48 sounds dark and grainy by comparison.
The ER-4 is definitely similar to the DT48(S) I have here, but the ER-4 is on a completely different level. The DT48 sounds notably darker and "crunchier" than the ER-4S and simply is not capable of the same level of resolution as the ER-4. The HD800 is the only thing I've heard that can out-detail the ER-4S. The ER-4 is also smoother and more linear in its frequency response.Are you kidding me? The ER-4 absolutely slaughters the DT48 in linearity and clarity. The DT48 sounds dark and grainy by comparison.
Dude, you cracked me up.
ER4 slaughters DT48? DT48 GRAINY? there is definitely something wrong with your DT48 system if it sounds grainy to you.
DT48 and ER4 are like the most similar sounding things I've ever heard. ER4S to me sounds basically like an in-ear DT48. Both are insanely clear, neutral and realistic sounding.
If anything, ER4S sounds slightly less clear.
but easily outclassed by a lot of modern equipment.
DT150, DT250, maybe LFF Paradox if limiting to modern headphones only (really not a lot of good closed headphones around today), if not, DR-Z7, Monitor 10-II, Monitor 10, maybe a modded YH-100but easily outclassed by a lot of modern equipment.
Among closed headphones which one outclasses DT48?
The ER-4 is definitely similar to the DT48(S) I have here, but the ER-4 is on a completely different level. The DT48 sounds notably darker and "crunchier" than the ER-4S and simply is not capable of the same level of resolution as the ER-4. The HD800 is the only thing I've heard that can out-detail the ER-4S. The ER-4 is also smoother and more linear in its frequency response.
Measurements support all of the claims I just made.
The DT48 is just about as clean/controlled as the ER-4, however. Again, not a bad headphone by any means, but easily outclassed by a lot of modern equipment.
I'm not sure the DT250 is better: I own and regularly use both a DT48E and a DT250/250, and find that the DT48 is streets ahead on midrange clarity, resolution and detail on the end of a variety of amps, solid-state, tube and hybrid.
For what it's worth, I have not found the DT48E to match particularly well with the O2 (which is also one of my go-to portable amps, albeit primarily for IEMs).