Mar 20, 2025 at 5:31 PM Post #37,623 of 37,897
 
Mar 21, 2025 at 3:09 AM Post #37,625 of 37,897
 
Mar 21, 2025 at 9:11 AM Post #37,626 of 37,897
Mar 21, 2025 at 6:14 PM Post #37,627 of 37,897
1742594904149.png


1742594929049.png


1742594965069.png


1742595028557.png


1742595118268.png


1742595184074.png
 
Mar 21, 2025 at 7:02 PM Post #37,629 of 37,897
IMG_3507.jpeg
 
Mar 22, 2025 at 4:31 PM Post #37,632 of 37,897
Musical Fidelity released this tube stage recently. Looks interesting. There's a diy following that recaps and replaces compents. Supposedly you can use this with any source.



1742664053165.jpeg

This is an upgraded board.
1742664278420.jpeg
At least it's the proper shape to do some serious tube rolling:laughing:
 
Mar 22, 2025 at 4:46 PM Post #37,633 of 37,897
@jerick70 everytime i do this, i end up regretting it, but.. when i see seemingly nice people (you may be horrible! Who knows! [i doubt it]) go this route.. i understand money/budget, i undestand being in the middle of the road as it were and hoping for magical inexpensive improvements. But often enough, this results to nothing but wasted money. So, with the best of intentions?

i) This was out in 1995. Not exactly new. And in the buffering domain? We've done leaps since :)

ii) If you were someone i'm comfortable with, in my store asking me about this?
I'd have told you that should this prove to be an improvement for you, you'd know beyond doubt your DAC needs to go out the window. ASAP.
It has some serious negative feedback (on purpose), it's strained/starved (on purpose), it's by now almost archaic in its approach; and with a cheap implementation to boot. What it then does after all that, again on purpose, is to add gain, sufficiently for even the uninitiated to notice, in the hopes of their conflating it with perceived an increase in "energy", dynamics, intensity, person depending. This is snake oil hardware alchemy at its finest, one of many examples where someone knowingly, consciously, went about selling the 'magic patch' to anyone willing to pay for it.

This was.. designed(?) to be an improvement for that first wave (mid '80s- early '90s) of cheap, horrible DACs that flooded the market.
Even at that time, medium to good DAC owners back then had nothing to gain by adding this to their chain. Even back then, so you can imagine today.
The money it'll cost you to buy it, mod it and add a proper power supply to it? You add the money from selling your current DAC too? You'll buy a hell of a lot better.

My 2 BAs, 1 MA, 1 PhD, 40+ years of professional experience personal 2 cents. Discard freely :)

* apologies for 104756 edits, oldfartitis!
** i just PMed you as well, double apologies if this isn't theoretical, but is instead a purchase; didn't even consider it while typing. Sincerely sorry if so. Would have framed it more diplomatically!
 
Last edited:
Mar 22, 2025 at 7:36 PM Post #37,634 of 37,897
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top