Latest Thread Images
Featured Sponsor Listings
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
The Audio Lounge
- Thread starter OldDude04
- Start date
OldDude04
Headphoneus Supremus
Oh man, great choice, that song contains all of the feels, lol. The album came out a year or two before I graduated, hearing it always takes me right back to that era.
Brings back the feels for me too bro. Sure do miss those days.Oh man, great choice, that song contains all of the feels, lol. The album came out a year or two before I graduated, hearing it always takes me right back to that era.
I ended up buying this upgrade. It brings the DMP-A6 ME to another level. Highly recommended for DMP-A6 owners.@g4ndr1k I found an interesting upgrade for the Eversolo DMP-A6. It's a direct replacement linear power supply. I run an LPS on some of my other gear and I think it makes a difference.
https://www.aliexpress.us/item/3256807598082648.html
frkasper
Headphoneus Supremus
More WOW
Lionel Richie & Diana Ross - Endless Love (Live 1982)
Lionel Richie & Diana Ross - Endless Love (Live 1982)
Last edited:
Musical Fidelity released this tube stage recently (I stand corrected, in 1995). Looks interesting. There's a diy following that recaps and replaces compents. Supposedly you can use this with any source.
This is an upgraded board.

This is an upgraded board.

Last edited:
Mr Trev
Headphoneus Supremus
At least it's the proper shape to do some serious tube rollingMusical Fidelity released this tube stage recently. Looks interesting. There's a diy following that recaps and replaces compents. Supposedly you can use this with any source.
This is an upgraded board.
![]()
LostHisMarbles
Head-Fier
@jerick70 everytime i do this, i end up regretting it, but.. when i see seemingly nice people (you may be horrible! Who knows! [i doubt it]) go this route.. i understand money/budget, i undestand being in the middle of the road as it were and hoping for magical inexpensive improvements. But often enough, this results to nothing but wasted money. So, with the best of intentions?
i) This was out in 1995. Not exactly new. And in the buffering domain? We've done leaps since
ii) If you were someone i'm comfortable with, in my store asking me about this?
I'd have told you that should this prove to be an improvement for you, you'd know beyond doubt your DAC needs to go out the window. ASAP.
It has some serious negative feedback (on purpose), it's strained/starved (on purpose), it's by now almost archaic in its approach; and with a cheap implementation to boot. What it then does after all that, again on purpose, is to add gain, sufficiently for even the uninitiated to notice, in the hopes of their conflating it with perceived an increase in "energy", dynamics, intensity, person depending. This is snake oil hardware alchemy at its finest, one of many examples where someone knowingly, consciously, went about selling the 'magic patch' to anyone willing to pay for it.
This was.. designed(?) to be an improvement for that first wave (mid '80s- early '90s) of cheap, horrible DACs that flooded the market.
Even at that time, medium to good DAC owners back then had nothing to gain by adding this to their chain. Even back then, so you can imagine today.
The money it'll cost you to buy it, mod it and add a proper power supply to it? You add the money from selling your current DAC too? You'll buy a hell of a lot better.
My 2 BAs, 1 MA, 1 PhD, 40+ years of professional experience personal 2 cents. Discard freely
* apologies for 104756 edits, oldfartitis!
** i just PMed you as well, double apologies if this isn't theoretical, but is instead a purchase; didn't even consider it while typing. Sincerely sorry if so. Would have framed it more diplomatically!
i) This was out in 1995. Not exactly new. And in the buffering domain? We've done leaps since

ii) If you were someone i'm comfortable with, in my store asking me about this?
I'd have told you that should this prove to be an improvement for you, you'd know beyond doubt your DAC needs to go out the window. ASAP.
It has some serious negative feedback (on purpose), it's strained/starved (on purpose), it's by now almost archaic in its approach; and with a cheap implementation to boot. What it then does after all that, again on purpose, is to add gain, sufficiently for even the uninitiated to notice, in the hopes of their conflating it with perceived an increase in "energy", dynamics, intensity, person depending. This is snake oil hardware alchemy at its finest, one of many examples where someone knowingly, consciously, went about selling the 'magic patch' to anyone willing to pay for it.
This was.. designed(?) to be an improvement for that first wave (mid '80s- early '90s) of cheap, horrible DACs that flooded the market.
Even at that time, medium to good DAC owners back then had nothing to gain by adding this to their chain. Even back then, so you can imagine today.
The money it'll cost you to buy it, mod it and add a proper power supply to it? You add the money from selling your current DAC too? You'll buy a hell of a lot better.
My 2 BAs, 1 MA, 1 PhD, 40+ years of professional experience personal 2 cents. Discard freely

* apologies for 104756 edits, oldfartitis!
** i just PMed you as well, double apologies if this isn't theoretical, but is instead a purchase; didn't even consider it while typing. Sincerely sorry if so. Would have framed it more diplomatically!
Last edited:
Passenger11
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2016
- Posts
- 8,989
- Likes
- 14,728
WOW ..,
Users who are viewing this thread
Total: 10 (members: 0, guests: 10)