Beagle
His body's not a canvas, and he wasn't raised by apes.
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2001
- Posts
- 9,194
- Likes
- 3,474
Seems rather stupid to not make it an even $10,000 which would add more of a prestige effect.
Who would pay $27,000 for a headphone? But then, no IQ test is required in order to possess too much money.I can almost see the boardroom meeting where these were created. "We're going to take like 10 ATH-AWKT, change out the headband, and pay someone $100 to paint cherry blossoms and a phoenix on them, then sell them for $9k each because they're a limited edition." That said, if they actually SOUND amazing, then this becomes a collector's item and triples in price in a few years.
I agree. There's something for everybody whenever it comes to any product.Dear Head-fiers,
Imagine that there are many business owners, software developers or managers that have loose $9k. And while they still value their $9k, it won't be a huge problem to pay that price if they also value listening to the music and the overall experience. So I really don't know what you are bitching about in a world with watches going $10k+, 5- 6- and 7-stars hotels with a night for $1k+, business class flights for $1+ etc.
Every topic on head-fi looks the same, there is a product launch and then people talking not about the music or beauty of the product, but complaining about the price all the time, and it never stops, repeated every time, all the time.
For me, headphones are more important than watches or cars, I love them and value them, and I love how ATH tunes their headphones, therefore am a fan of the brand, and so I am waiting patiently for my pre-ordered pair of W2022, which is just one way of making life a little bit nicer.
So you're saying they sound better than the Sony MDR-R10?I imagine that many people have heard these by now. I can attest to the fact that they are off the chain.
As everyone knows I do not comment on actual sound characteristics. However, I shall state that these ae most likely the best closed back Headphones made to date. Perhaps open to ones discern the best headphones to date period.
M_M
MDR-R10 = diffuse field neutral, almost no bass, at least currently after cleaning and we have no way of knowing how the original foams worked as we can only replace them with not-original ones.So you're saying they sound better than the Sony MDR-R10?
Yes most R10 if not all will require some work, especially the foam surround that would have rotted away already. bwb2000 supply the foam or restore the R10 back to it former glory.I did not see this. Not even close to the same Animal.
Might as well just compare the R10 to the 010 again or something.
If you want Sony get a CD3000. At least they might still work.
I am not sure that anyone has a truly "working" R10 anymore. Mine certainly have seen way better days.
As Piotr stated, the R10 ruled for Classical. If they no longer work what would be the point at this juncture.
Notwithstanding. I maintain that for Pop and light rock these may be the best headphones to date. This, still open to many an argument however.
I will say one thing in closing. Material items are priced accordingly. These can and have Commanded the $9000.00 . I would not be so quick to refute their price tag Personally.
So, did you really do A-B test with HD800S. Please, pay attention: S. Twice, in you reply you mention HD800 without S, so I think you rushed replying and you replied quoting the wrong set. Second, HD800s, so far, stands the time and competition - I would value a bit more details on technicalities and sound signature vs comparison with pens.There is no comparison to the HD800. In a completely different league. Well, TBH they just sound so different than those. However if you like HD800 bass these have more, go lower, tighter and faster. Maybe you could compare just the bass but the W2022 are much better.
I have come to the belief of these being better than all of my Namiki Emperor as well. I can't listen to pens