TDA2030 into 600 Ohm phones

Nov 15, 2005 at 9:42 AM Thread Starter Post #1 of 3

Shoewreck

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Sep 11, 2005
Posts
681
Likes
44
Location
St Petersburg
A friend gave me an amp ripped from his MM Sven speakers. It was built on a pair of TDA2030A's. I don't listen to loudspeakers at all, so finally I decided to use it to drive my headphones, as a PA can provide enough current for nearly anything and enough voltage for 600 Ohm cans.
The amp wasn't BTL, so wiring was easy. Here are some mods I made to get better match to my setup:
0) Two 6.3mm headphone jacks - I have two pairs of headphones to power.
1) Tone bypassing - just removed that pots and jumpered the holes for Bass control. Standard Baxandall circuit is so easy to bypass
cool.gif
.
2) Additional 100nF metal film PS filtering caps: I hope they mentioned them in the datasheet for a reason and the PCB already had pre-drilled holes for them.
wink.gif

3) Amp gain was cut from about 43 to about 33 - I dont need so much and I believe that stronger feedback would make that high-open-loop-gain amp sound better.

Mods to do:
0) Housing
1) More feedback - cut the gain to about minimum allowed 24dB as soon as I get going well-matched resistors.
3) Tantalum decoupling caps - having electrolythics in feedback is as bad as having them in signal path.
4) Class A biasing - actually I doubt if I need it. Given an AB mode amp with quiescent current of about 40mA it is unlikely co come off the pure class A PP with my cans.

And, finally, the impressions vs. my soundcard line out:
1) Great volume increase.
2) Attack became much sharper
3) A bit noise, almost out there with more feedback (and definetly in there with Grados
rs1smile.gif
)
4) Some veiliness - this might be a kind of light distortion, or just the electrolythics. Feedback has helped a bit.
 
Nov 15, 2005 at 11:41 AM Post #2 of 3
More mods:

1) Bye-bye DC decoupling caps, operating point didn't change a millivolt.
2) 2*1K=2K, IC gain should be about 27dB. Increasing Feedback is no more the point.

Results:

1) dead silent with AKG's (until I turn that volume pot
smily_headphones1.gif
basshead.gif
), still too noisy for Grados (who ever minds if Grados are too noisy?)
2) Sounds clean to me, maybe just a bit Hi-Fi'ish (in bad or good sense, I don't mind)

Note: Housing, make the housing!
 
Nov 24, 2005 at 12:58 PM Post #3 of 3
I've done some measurements with RMAA:

For AKGK240DF as load (figures are the same with no load!):

Frequency response (from 40 Hz to 15 kHz), dB:+0.02, -0.11Excellent
Noise level, dB (A):-94.2Very good
Dynamic range, dB (A):93.7Very good
THD, %:0.0007Excellent
IMD, %:0.0091Very good
Stereo crosstalk, dB:-72.1Good
IMD at 10 kHz, %:0.0066Excellent

For Grado SR80 as load:

Frequency response (from 40 Hz to 15 kHz), dB:+0.02, -0.13Excellent
Noise level, dB (A):-94.1Very good
Dynamic range, dB (A):93.7Very good
THD, %:0.0030Very good
IMD, %:0.014Very good
Stereo crosstalk, dB:-73.6Good
IMD at 10 kHz, %:0.0076Excellent

Grados were way too loud to listen while measuring. So, at useable listening levels noise is too high to enjoy.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top