- Joined
- Mar 30, 2007
- Posts
- 2,495
- Likes
- 431
To be honest, if you have the SR-X mk3 and a NB Lambda, they are some of the best vintage Stax around...thank you very much....
I'm not really in my place here among headphone enthusiasts...
I don't use much listening to headphones, just sometimes in pro control or in reference so as not to get lost in DIY development...
I allowed myself to push the door, it's because I saw the CE SR-X1 the opportunity to upgrade to something new, break the bank...
I actually have some old 340-240 sextet (and historical DT-48) on pro sound device headphone amp..or old stax with more or less problems marked with balance..olds srxmk3 or lambda on srd7 mods... but basically I have no experiences.... the same in peq correction.. .
but I know on the other hand that these approaches of target curves determined by statistical research are more "cultural"... for example for many the notion of timbre is a very very relative notion given what they listen to etc etc..
but typically, and the few experiences that I have encountered have convinced me...this desired accepted bump zone has a heavy impact on the timbres...
this is therefore seriously discussed..I am sensitive to it...but respect those who doesn't care a bit and is looking for other things
I will follow with interest your discussions of measurements of this helmet..which I will certainly buy....having a primary affection for the mk3 more than the lambda...
thanks again, -)
X1 has more extended bass, is smoother and a bit warmer than both of these imo.
If you are primarily into acoustic music though, not sure what great benefit you would get vs getting a new headphone. I suggest getting a better amp!