SoundMAGIC PL-50 released, received, reviewed!!!
Jun 21, 2009 at 6:20 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 371

ClieOS

IEM Reviewer Extraordinaire
Joined
May 11, 2004
Posts
21,292
Likes
12,294
Location
Mid Johor, Malaysia
1245561232849185101.jpg


Grabbed this picture from Mingo-HMW just now, looks like PL-50 is official on sale for US$70~71 (in Hong Kong anyway). It will be SoundMAGIC first blanaced armature based IEM. I am emailing SoundMAGIC for more detail of it, hopefully I'll get a reply soon. In any case, here is an unofficial list of spec I found on the web.

Speaker: 6.4mm balanced armature transducer
Impedance: 55.5ohm +/-15% (@ 1kHz)
Sensitivity: 109 +/-2dB
Frequency Response: 15Hz to 22kHz
Rated Power: 2mW
Max Power: 10mW
Connector: 3.5mm golden pin
Cable Length: 1.2m
Package:
1 Soundmagic PL50
7 sets of earbuds
1 warranty card
1 cable winder
1 carrying pouch
Warranty: 1 year

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[UPDATE] Just got the IEM. Also, I think the better estimation of the MSRP is around US$55.

teaser.jpg


------------------------------------------------------------------------


[size=x-large][REVIEW] SoundMAGIC PL-50[/size]

First, I want to thanks Tony @ SoundMAGIC for offering me the chance to review the PL-50. I first got wind of a balanced armature based SoundMAGIC few weeks ago when I came across a pre-order page on another forum. There wasn't a lot of info back then to made out how well this IEM are going be. Plus, SoundMAGIC usually like to operate under the radar, making it difficult to tell what kind of product they are planning for. I have been in contact with Tony since last year when the PL-30 was on hot sale, basically asking questions and getting detail of their flagship at the time. Personally I am not that excited when I received my PL-30. It sounds quite good as a sub-$50 IEM for sure, but I could never get a seal good enough for me to use it in long term. Instead, I take a liking to their PL20 and PL11 offering simply because of better fit. As I always say, you are going to get a good sound only after you get a good fit.

For those who don't know anything about SoundMAGIC, they not only make their own line of headphone, but also are the OEM supplier of several well known headphone brands around the world (Beyerdynamic for an example).

PL50x01.jpg

[size=xx-small]The case is about twice as thick as PL11/20's case, but much better looking.[/size]

PL50x06.jpg


Spec
Driver: Single Balanced Armature Transducer
Sensitivity: 109 +/-2 dB SPL @ 1 kHz
Impedance: 55.5 +/- 15% Ohm @ 1 kHz
Frequency Response: 15Hz - 22 kHz
Cord: 1.20m
Plug: Gold-Plated Stereo 3.5mm Mini-Plug

PL50x07.jpg


PL50x08.jpg


Packaging, Accessories, and Build Quality
PL-50 spots a very classy packaging - the best I have seen on any Chinese brand so far. The general foot print of the box is still quite small, but thicker on the side to accommodate a hard case (as the same kind found only on SoundMAGIC previous flagship, the PL-30). By opening the side windows, you can take a peek on the IEM itself (with the mid sized foam tips) and 4 pair of different sized silicone single flange eartips (S, M , L, XL). Inside the box, you will find the warranty card and a hard case in the back compartment with 2 silicone ear hooks and two more foam tips (S, L). Now you should take note that the foam tips are actually smaller in size compared to similar foam tips offered by other manufacturers. What I mean is, the large sized foam tips is actually about the same size as a mid sized Shure black foam (olive). Also, they are more rubbery than normal foam. The good news is, these foam actually have a inner tubing (as opposite to the cheaper type that has no inner tubing).

PL50x09.jpg


PL50x10.jpg


The nozzle on the earpeice is slightly larger in diameter than typical Shure or Westone and has a bump close to the base to hold the eartips in place more firmly (those who own Philips SHE9850 will know the design). That said, Shure olive can fit in but it is very tight - so tight that I won't recommend even trying (as you might break the nozzle when trying to remove). Comply T100 fits too, but it is also a tight fit (just not as tight as olive). If you are seeking aftermarket replacement eartips, here are some that I have tried and work quite well: Shure grey flex sleeve, Sony hybrid replacement silicone eartips, tri-flanges, big bi-flange, and JAYS's replacement eartips (including their foam tips). In all, I will recommend JAYS eartips as the eartips of choice for replacement, but not their foam tips since it exposes too much of the nozzle opening for earwax. For those who are looking a long term foam solution, I will recommend you to try my Olive-on-Jays mod, which works very well and give optimum comfort, grip and easy access for future eartips replacement / exchange.

PL50x11.jpg


PL50x13.jpg


PL50x14.jpg


As far as I can tell, the earpiece itself is plastic and it is extremely light. It finished with a dark blue metallic coating which is very classy to look at. The fit is close to phenomenal - I dare said PL-50 is almost as good as my Westone UM2, which is renowned for its fit. The strain relief is color coated for left/right channels. The cable in use is similar to those found on NuForce NE-7M, soft but generally strong and don't have memory effect or tangle easily. The Y-splitter and the mini jack look very well built. I especially like how the mini jack is designed for iPhone yet still remains very practical- much more elegant than the solution Shure has on its SE530. The inclusion of ear hook is a good plus though the cable is quite easy to use in over-the-ear style without the hook, which of course also help eliminate any microphonics issue. If you are wearing PL-50 in a more or less stationary position (such as in front of desk), you can plug it in upside-down / hanging position. It still works very well but there will be a bit of microphonics issue if you start to move around. Overall, I am very please with the quality of PL-50.

PL50x16.jpg


Sound Quality
As a standard procedure, I burnt PL-50 in for 50 hrs fore the review. Some of you might think it is a complete waste of time, but not this time. There is a small degree of noticeable change in sound quality in the first few hours (< 2 hrs) of the burn in as I checked in constant interval. Soundstage widen a little as the overall sound becomes less compressed. It isn't something drastic but it is noticeable. Whatever you like to call it burn-in or placebo, the sound becomes quite stable after the first few hours, but the full procedure was carried out nonetheless.

On my O.J. mod'ed Shure olive tips, the overall sound signature is warm, smooth, full sounding mid with rather sweet male vocal performance. Bass is on the leaner side but still adequate, definitely not what I'll describe as bass shy, but more like below average. Mid is full and take dominance over the whole sound signature (in a good way). Male vocal sounds pretty sweet but female vocal doesn't have as much detail since the upper mid and treble is rather smooth without any peaks or highlight. There are some degree of detail but lacks sparkle, thus not much fine detail to speak of (and no sibilance if that is what concerns you). Analytical listeners need not apply. Isolation is rated at -20dB, which is about correct with the default foam tips and quite consistent with the mod'ed olive tips. That is about average on my scale. Soundstage is also about average with the foam tip.

On the stock silicone single flange eartips, the mid is not as full and leans a little more toward the neutral side, giving a slightly more revealing sound that tends to better suited on female vocal. However, the overall sound signature still remains warm and smooth. Soundstage is also better and airier with the silicone stock, but the isolation is probably 1~2 dB less. Not a major drop but noticeable in comparison.

In sum, PL-50 has a rather 'popular' sound signature. Not bassy nor bass-shy, not bright nor too dull - plus a mid that tend to work fairly well in most genre of music.

So how does PL-50's SQ compares to SoundMAGIC previous flagship PL-30? In short, there is no competition. PL-30 is a good sub-$50 budget class IEM, but in my opinion PL-50 has very well reached the top of entry class IEM, which is a class above PL-30.

PL50x15.jpg


Conclusion
SoundMAGIC has always been a good choice for those in tight budget, their new flagship is no exception. If you went out and bought a pair of balanced armature (BA) transducers on your own then fit them into an housing, I doubt you can even get half decent sound with mere $55 of budget. BA based IEM have always been criticized for their price, but SoundMAGIC PL-50 has absolutely pushed the limit... the only question left is, have you have your wallet ready yet? Do expect this to cast an even bigger storm than PL-30!!!

You can read the quick sum up here.


Expect this to be on sale very soon at: HiFi Headphones UK (our sponsor) and (possibly) MP4Nation.net [UPDATE] Also found on Head-Direct.com, FocalPrice.com and DealPerfect.com.


p/s: Lately there are many IEM with very high performance / price ratio surface onto the market front, especially in the budget and entry class sections. This new trend has made these part of the market an active 'war zone' where shopper being bombarded with great deals one over another. This is just a piece of advice for those who are currently seeking to 'score' the best of the bucks: These deals, as great as they all seem to be, are only as good as the level they fit into your budget, taste and lifestyle. Always consider the practicality side of the deals over sound quality. There is pointless to buy a great sounding IEM that you won't be able to use. Cheer.
 
Jun 21, 2009 at 6:25 PM Post #3 of 371
Quote:

...looks like PL-50 is official on sale for US$70~71 (in Hong Kong anyway).


biggrin.gif
 
Jun 21, 2009 at 6:57 PM Post #5 of 371
I am liking how the dynamic driver phones have been coming along. I don't know about them going armature. Let's hope they turned out well, more toward Phonak SQ than SE110 SQ. Could go either way. They look very slick for sure though.
 
Jun 22, 2009 at 1:07 AM Post #8 of 371
Quote:

Originally Posted by koven /img/forum/go_quote.gif
curious to see a review on these


+1. Might jump on them if noone else does if mp4nation gets em in stock
 
Jun 22, 2009 at 12:00 PM Post #12 of 371
Here are what I got from SoundMAGIC's email reply, enjoy!

PL50p.jpg

PL50s.jpg
 
Jun 22, 2009 at 1:35 PM Post #13 of 371
I don't like the looks, but looking at the PL-30, the performance could be way up there. I just hope that they will at least change the font of their name on this thing, it makes them look like some cheap ebay deal.
 
Jun 22, 2009 at 3:28 PM Post #14 of 371
Thanks Clie. The design reminds me a bit of the CK9 except these are "flatter," if that makes any sense. I'm inclined to agree with jant71; it would have been more interesting to me if this was a dynamic driver model. Still looking forward to impressions.
 
Jun 22, 2009 at 4:16 PM Post #15 of 371
Thanx for the new pics, ClieOS. Did they also give you the official spec of PL-50, date of release, and price?
smily_headphones1.gif
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top