kms108
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2012
- Posts
- 2,809
- Likes
- 864
I seems an mk 2 of the zx300, its larger and much rounder, not worth the upgrade if you have the zx300, unless you want something new.
I don't like the look of the zx500 as much as the zx300 and I do like the Sony interface, so I probably won''t upgrade. (Certainly not immediately, anyway.) USB is does mean fewer cables, but it's not a big issue for me. There's always that desire to have the newest thing when it comes out, but I'm not rich enough to upgrade every iteration, and after a month or two I get over my envy. I'm actually more interested in the limited edition A100 model, with the case that looks like the original TPS-L2 and the cassette screensaver, but probably not enough to fork out the cash for it.
PS: The specs for the A100 say it has maximum output of 35mW (JEITA 16Ω/mW), but that can't be right, can it? The zx300 has 4.2mW on balanced, and the A100 is a lower-specced model.
Well if the rest doesn't interest you wouldn't you be better off picking up a cheaper DAP with USB-C like the M11?I want the ZX500 only for that USB C charging port. The rest doesn't interest me TBH.
Apparently the ZX500 has a copper chassis which was a feature of the 1Z as well as more capacitors than the ZX300, so sound improvements are definitely a possibility, we'll just have to wait and see!Great to see sony go to usb c but i guess i'm skipping this since it doesn't look much like an upgrade to the zx300 (basically android and wifi which i wouldn't use), might reconsider if it's a significant upgrade soundwise. Now, if they make a new version of the wm1a i'd definitely consider getting one.
Well if the rest doesn't interest you wouldn't you be better off picking up a cheaper DAP with USB-C like the M11?
Apparently the ZX500 has a copper chassis which was a feature of the 1Z as well as more capacitors than the ZX300, so sound improvements are definitely a possibility, we'll just have to wait and see!
I rea a review of the ZX300 that made a point about the Sony proprietary interface. It transfers music a lot faster than USB C. …….. Just saying.
I’m pretty sure the zx300 has a copper block in it too, but probably not as heavy duty... and it’s not specifically mentioned in the sales particulars, but it is on the exploded view.
The chassis is still aluminium, it does have a copper shield thoApparently the ZX500 has a copper chassis which was a feature of the 1Z as well as more capacitors than the ZX300, so sound improvements are definitely a possibility, we'll just have to wait and see!
True true, those points really do make the ZX300 (and ZX500 but with Android) stand out from the rest. Looking at the spec sheet it weighs in at ~160 grams which is only a tad heavier the the ZX300 so I wouldn't worry about the weightFunnily enough, when buying they also had the M11. It was more expensive too!
And unfortunately, the battery on the M11 isn't great. It's also too big for me. The main draws I had to the ZX300 were:
The legendary battery life
Relatively small for a DAP with balanced connection
No-nonsense interface designed only for music
The main attraction with the ZX500 is the bigger screen and the USB-C port. Everything else unfortunately is a downside for me.
I hope not! Copper is way too heavy to lug around.
Yeah, I don't believe that...........
The interface is still USB in the end. USB C doesn't mean it's faster or slower - it's simply a style of connector.
Could you link me that review please? I want to read the rest of it!
The chassis is still aluminium, it does have a copper shield tho
people might think it's made from plastic.
So does the zx300... so not sure why they suddenly feel they need to mention it?