Sony NW-ZX300
post-13840869
Post #2,566 of 11,402

Poleepkwa

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Mar 24, 2010
Messages
172
Reaction score
12
Joined
Mar 24, 2010
Posts
172
Likes
12
I realised that I do not really need the online functionality that the Fiio X5 III offers and could rather use a longer batterlife. Any ZX300 owners have some impressions as how they compare sound wise?
 
     Share This Post       
post-13840889
Post #2,567 of 11,402

lomenhk

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Aug 3, 2012
Messages
142
Reaction score
95
Joined
Aug 3, 2012
Posts
142
Likes
95
Depending on headphones and IEMs, I actually prefer the sense of richness on the zx2 compared to the zx300. For harder to drive headphones, the zx300 exhibits shear sense of power and stronger dynamics over the ZX2. Still, I do find the zx2 to be warmer in tone and has a stronger lower end and can be very great match with slightly more Cobb county. The ZX300 is leaner and also clearner with more power. I still think that the ZX1 done right while the ZX2 is kind of the 1Z but without the drivability and thicker tone. I only have 200 hour on the Balanced out of zx200. Hopefully it will get even smoother and more relaxed.
Yes, agree. ZX2 indeed has the richness and stronger bass than ZX300 if both compared with SE. But I found the richness of SQ from 4.4mm socket of ZX300 is stronger than ZX2, so always as being said the 4.4 balanced feature is the "main dish" of ZX300, the SE is just a "bundle gift". I audition it with N3AP, and found ZX300 wins in lots of area: treble extension, details of timbre, soundstage (a bit wider and cubic), etc.. if comes to bass, the attack is still a little bit weaker than ZX2 but almost on par. The 4.4 balanced socket only has 3-4 hours burn-in, so still uncertain if there will be anymore changes before the 200 hours mark.
 
     Share This Post       
post-13840936
Post #2,568 of 11,402

JerryHead

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Messages
250
Reaction score
55
Location
SoCal (North America)
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Location
SoCal (North America)
Posts
250
Likes
55
Can you tell me the difference between these two cables, besides the fact the second costs quite a bit more? Is it that the second one (Kimber) is more comfortable, because of the braided wire? Less weight and more flexible? But they sound the same? Thanks.
 
     Share This Post       
post-13841061
Post #2,569 of 11,402

psikey

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jul 15, 2008
Messages
2,148
Reaction score
1,016
Joined
Jul 15, 2008
Posts
2,148
Likes
1,016
Can you tell me the difference between these two cables, besides the fact the second costs quite a bit more? Is it that the second one (Kimber) is more comfortable, because of the braided wire? Less weight and more flexible? But they sound the same? Thanks.
Not had the standard one and only got the Kimber one as I bought mine 2nd hand for same price as standard one.

Some who had both said Kimber adds a bit oh weight to bass, but personally my ears can't detect any SQ difference to my cheap Fiio balanced cable.

It is really flexible and oozes quality but I'd go for the standard if buying new. Kimber is higher grade, more twists cable, the end connectors and plug are same on both I believe. Best connectors I've had with mmcx as some can be loose.
 
     Share This Post       
post-13841089
Post #2,570 of 11,402

Partlys4int

500+ Head-Fier
Joined
Jul 12, 2015
Messages
598
Reaction score
209
Joined
Jul 12, 2015
Posts
598
Likes
209
If Klipsch doesn't come out with balanced IEM's, my ZX300's SE will get a lot more usage than the balanced output. And I'm not complaining, as I thoroughly enjoy its SQ with (efficient) IEMS.
It would be nice if other manufacturers added more balancedd gear to the market. Right now, I'm strongly considering the Shure SR1540 with a balanced Sony cable. But given the bulk, these would only get used indoors.
Also: when I take a look at many balanced cables, they all seem rather thick (naturally). So not really convenient when you're in a hurry during commute.

I disagree with some noting the SE as a 'side dish'. If reviewers think it's on par or better with that of the ZX2 (a 1200 dollars device), how could it possibly be a side-dish? The fact that Sony managed to make the SE very good and added an even better balanced output to that, just speaks volumes to the value of this device within its price range in my opinion.

tldr: we're being spoiled by Sony. I bet they could've sold this with only SE for 100 dollars less and people would buy it, after all it's better than the ZX100 with DAC, touchscreen, built,etc... Just hasn't got the 128 gbs.... The more and more I use this, the more I'm convinced that I've done a wonderful purchase. It feels nice to see your spent money validated :)
 
Last edited:
post-13841117
Post #2,571 of 11,402

Brice d’Oliveira

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Oct 20, 2017
Messages
117
Reaction score
35
Location
France
Joined
Oct 20, 2017
Location
France
Posts
117
Likes
35
Hi guys,
So after setting up the EQ I finally enjoy so much the zx300.
Such a nice device, sleek, fast, wonderful sound everything smooth.
I’m thinking about going balanced now...
But i have a little budget ...
Can you please give me some infos and some models to start with balanced :) ?
I’m thinking having connectors for the earbuds the same as Sony (i think it’s something like Mmcx) with 4.4mm jack.
Even a second hand but something clean
Again and again thanks a lot
 
Last edited:
     Share This Post       
post-13841118
Post #2,572 of 11,402

abitdeef

Formerly known as ihatepopupads
Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Oct 30, 2003
Messages
5,818
Reaction score
2,665
Joined
Oct 30, 2003
Posts
5,818
Likes
2,665
If Klipsch doesn't come out with balanced IEM's, my ZX300's SE will get a lot more usage than the balanced output. And I'm not complaining, as I throughly enjoy its SQ with (efficient) IEMS.
It would be nice if other manufacturers added more balancedd gear to the market. Right now, I'm strongly considering the Shure SR1540 with a balanced Sony cable. But given the bulk, these would only get used indoors.
Also: when I take a look at many balanced cables, they all seem rather thick (naturally). So not really convenient when you're in a hurry during commute.

I disagree with some noting the SE as a 'side dish'. If reviewers think it's on par or better with that of the ZX2 (a 1200 dollars device), how could it possibly be a side-dish? The fact that Sony managed to make the SE very good and added an even better balanced output to that, just speaks volumes to the value of this device within its price range in my opinion.
Well said my friend. The SE output continues to improve with wider soundstage and better extended smoother treble and more controlled bass. I'd say I have 80 hours on it. It is one of the best sounding daps that I've had the pleasure of listening to, with only output power limiting it. It sounds rich, detailed and organic now I love listening to this thing, was listening to OK computer last night and I've never heard it sound better. Piano and stings sound really dynamic and natural and hi hats sizzle just like in real life ( 'Dreams' by Fleetwood Mac sounds so real, the cymbal strikes sound just amazing now. ) Not analytical but with real body and timbre. Imaging has improved also, with stuff having a more defined presence in the soundscape.


I can't wait to burn in the more powerful balanced output, I do wish there were more choices for balanced. Hopefully sony will sell lots of the zx300. I just want to say I got the zx300 cheaper than I can buy a zx100 on amazon here in merica, so I consider that a great value.

One other thing, looking at the pcb and ic setup of the 300 I can say it's one of the cleanest and leanest I've seen.

And I don't ever want a dap with a shiny screen, the matt screen is utterly brilliant.
 
Last edited:
     Share This Post       
post-13841254
Post #2,573 of 11,402

purk

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Sep 26, 2001
Messages
10,106
Reaction score
2,032
Joined
Sep 26, 2001
Posts
10,106
Likes
2,032
Yes, agree. ZX2 indeed has the richness and stronger bass than ZX300 if both compared with SE. But I found the richness of SQ from 4.4mm socket of ZX300 is stronger than ZX2, so always as being said the 4.4 balanced feature is the "main dish" of ZX300, the SE is just a "bundle gift". I audition it with N3AP, and found ZX300 wins in lots of area: treble extension, details of timbre, soundstage (a bit wider and cubic), etc.. if comes to bass, the attack is still a little bit weaker than ZX2 but almost on par. The 4.4 balanced socket only has 3-4 hours burn-in, so still uncertain if there will be anymore changes before the 200 hours mark.
IMO, the two DAPs (ZX2 & ZX300) have different tonality. The ZX300 in balanced is dynamic, clear, and transparent for the DAP world. The ZX2, OTOH, has more organic and warmer sound. It is as spacious but just not as powerful. However, I'm hearing greater sense of decay from the ZX2. Bass wise, the ZX2 punches a little stronger with better bloom while the ZX300 is tighter. I'm comparing the ZX300's balanced to ZX2's output here. I also find voicing to be a little sweeter with the ZX2. Yes, the ZX2 can't drive harder headphones the way the ZX300 can. However, my relatively easy to drive recabled Sony MDR-SA5000 with 50 ohm impedance does sound just as good if not slightly more pleasing from the ZX2 than the ZX300. If anything I would put the two players as being in the same tier as long as you don't plan to use harder to drive headphones on the ZX300. I'm not relying on memory here either and do have both player side by side for comparison. I think Sony has done very well with the released of the ZX300. I'm super impressed despite what I said about the ZX2 vs. ZX300 comparison because the form factor on the ZX300 is perfect and it is nearly $500 cheaper. I will report back once the ZX300 has reached the 250 hours mark.
 
Last edited:
     Share This Post       
  • Like
Reactions: kms108
post-13841471
Post #2,574 of 11,402

Mark2010

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Sep 26, 2009
Messages
211
Reaction score
30
Joined
Sep 26, 2009
Posts
211
Likes
30
My zx300 just arrived today so far I'm very happy with the sound.

The only issue I have is that the Sony leather case I bought for it doesn't come with a screen protector so I have to buy that separately.

As I remember the Sony case for the zx100 also had a screen protector included.
 
     Share This Post       
post-13841829
Post #2,577 of 11,402

JerryHead

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Messages
250
Reaction score
55
Location
SoCal (North America)
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Location
SoCal (North America)
Posts
250
Likes
55
Just bought the SONY MUC-M12SB1 1.2m Balanced Standard Plug Headphone Cable off of an eBay seller in Asia for my Shure SE846s. The listing didn't say anything about them being "MMCX" or for the "XBA Series" though. But all of them with this model number are for MMCX, and for XBA, correct? Just want to make sure that I didn't buy the wrong thing and that they'll fit my Shures.
 
     Share This Post       
post-13841847
Post #2,578 of 11,402

abitdeef

Formerly known as ihatepopupads
Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Oct 30, 2003
Messages
5,818
Reaction score
2,665
Joined
Oct 30, 2003
Posts
5,818
Likes
2,665
My zx300 just arrived today so far I'm very happy with the sound.

The only issue I have is that the Sony leather case I bought for it doesn't come with a screen protector so I have to buy that separately.

As I remember the Sony case for the zx100 also had a screen protector included.

I wouldn't worry too much as the Sony case protects good and the screen is glass. If the screen was plastic I would be worried, but I use mine 'naked' all the time and don't worry about it. If you didn't have the case well then if you're going to use it out and about I'd recommend a screen protector. But with the flip case you have good protection.

Unless it falls face down on something 7 and above on the mohs hardness scale you will be alright. That's quartz and up :wink: I will say unless it's a very high level of hardened or gorilla glass corundum will scratch the **** out of your screen. And here in the US corundum is used in a mineral mix to fortify the blacktop and asphalt used on the roads. Also it's used in driveway mixes so you can accumulate corundum on your car mats and if dropped on corundum it will Shirley scratch your screen without a saver. I dropped an ipod touch on my car mats only to receive a huge scratch from corundum that accumulated over time.
 
Last edited:
     Share This Post       
  • Like
Reactions: Mark2010
post-13841875
Post #2,579 of 11,402

abitdeef

Formerly known as ihatepopupads
Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Oct 30, 2003
Messages
5,818
Reaction score
2,665
Joined
Oct 30, 2003
Posts
5,818
Likes
2,665
Just bought the SONY MUC-M12SB1 1.2m Balanced Standard Plug Headphone Cable off of an eBay seller in Asia for my Shure SE846s. The listing didn't say anything about them being "MMCX" or for the "XBA Series" though. But all of them with this model number are for MMCX, and for XBA, correct? Just want to make sure that I didn't buy the wrong thing and that they'll fit my Shure
Just bought the SONY MUC-M12SB1 1.2m Balanced Standard Plug Headphone Cable off of an eBay seller in Asia for my Shure SE846s. The listing didn't say anything about them being "MMCX" or for the "XBA Series" though. But all of them with this model number are for MMCX, and for XBA, correct? Just want to make sure that I didn't buy the wrong thing and that they'll fit my Shures.

Yep you are ok , but that cable is the heavy duty kimber cable not the normal balanced. So it's $$$$, and thick enough to rapell from an Apache. :)
 
     Share This Post       
  • Like
Reactions: superuser1
post-13841946
Post #2,580 of 11,402

Mark2010

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Sep 26, 2009
Messages
211
Reaction score
30
Joined
Sep 26, 2009
Posts
211
Likes
30
Another thing I noticed about the zx300 is that it doesn't let you display the album art on the whole screen like the zx100 did.
 
     Share This Post       

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top