purk
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2001
- Posts
- 11,079
- Likes
- 3,986
The zx100 is noticeably superior sounding compared to the A35. I expect the same if not even more improvements across the board on the zx300 even over the zx100.
The zx100 is noticeably superior sounding compared to the A35. I expect the same if not even more improvements across the board on the zx300 even over the zx100.
How to change?
Get the ZX300, the sound quality is equivalent to the WM1A, it's cheaper, lighter and has the DAC feature.Guys, need your opinion. Should I buy the zx300 next month or wait a couple of months and buy the wm1a? Thanks!
Guys, need your opinion. Should I buy the zx300 next month or wait a couple of months and buy the wm1a? Thanks!
Wm1a for sure
Wait a couple months if you can, cause ZX300 will also be cheaper then and there will be several more options on the market.Guys, need your opinion. Should I buy the zx300 next month or wait a couple of months and buy the wm1a? Thanks!
The silver sounds brighter? How is that possible or are we using the same analogy as with 1A/Z?I like the form factor if the zx300 better than the 1A. And yes the silver sounds brighter because it IS brighter.
lord help us.
That's completely bs, they are the same material and they cannot sound any different since they are the same thing. Even the copper on the wm1z makes very little difference itself.Owned WM1Z and compared both WM1A and ZX300 a few days ago.
Don't think ZX300 can replace WM1A in terms of sound quality and signature.
ZX300 has narrower sound stage, bass not that detailed and tighten as WM1A. IMO WM1A have a punchy, clear sound signature which ZX300 isn't , which is a bit laid back and warm sounding DAP similar to WM1Z.
Btw, some say the silver and black ZX300 sounds a bit different, which silver one is brighter than the black.