aertus
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2016
- Posts
- 645
- Likes
- 291
beats released 600 dollars pair of headphones haha because its a collaboration with French Designer.
beats released 600 dollars pair of headphones haha because its a collaboration with French Designer.
beats released 600 dollars pair of headphones haha because its a collaboration with French Designer.
Yeah...............no thanks. lol
No idea what those are, but I would be curious to find out more (?)
George, don't waste your time. I give much credit to the Beats line for making headphones SUPER popular..........more than they ever were in the past. But they are overpriced (Beats Pro are like $400) and the quality doesn't match what headphones half their price can do. They also are well-known for being overly bassy and I've even talked to one person at some store who said his Beats' bass gets distorted when he puts the volume up. No thanks. lol A close friend of mine has several Beats and he even told me not too long ago that he feels they are too bassy too. Though the guy who created them, famous rapper and producer Dr. Dre, is a true legend in rap music. His album, The Chronic, was like the biggest rap album ever when it came out some 25 years ago, and well-regarded for its production quality (which Dre also oversaw). The rapper Snoop Dogg appeared on that album, and used it to start his own very successful solo career.
Oh... I thought from the links that the conversation was about some graphene headphones that might have came with an interesting technology.
What do you guys think about these new wireless ones from Audio-Technica? I'm not a big fan of them, but these are well-reviewed and this new Pure Digital Drive technology sounds interesting. Instead of converting digital sound to Audio at the source via DAC, the DAC is bypassed completely until it reaches the headphones, and then it's converted to analog at the last second, which is why the sound is better/clearer. It's not cheap ($549 on Amazon), and the body is mostly plastic (though looks nice), but it does sound interesting and the sound quality based on a few reviews say it's excellent. The wired option is only for connecting to a PC, but maybe that's ok? George, aertus, akg fanboy, etc, let's hear it!
http://majorhifi.com/wireless-headphone-audio-technica-ath-dsr9bt-review/
I've no idea, they might be interesting!
At the moment I was looking into some Wireless headphones that promise to even add a step of remastering to music, never heard them, but might be interesting as well https://www.remasteringmusic.com
In fact, I am not even 100% if those are wireless or just have an interesting tech for remastering, but call me curious about them
For the Audio Tehnica above, I don't see anything inherently wrong with it, but I was not happy with ATH m50 one bit, so if they follow that sound then it is a no for me. I did like Audio Tehnica A700X and A900X though, so it really depends on which signature they are going for.
My issue with these AT ones specifically is that I don't understand how they're actually any different than other BT headphones. They too take a digital signal which is BYPASSED by the source device since it needs to remain digital to be transferred via BT, and then the headphones receive the digital signal and have an on-board DAC which converts it into audio. So how are these any different? Yet AT makes it seem like they are. Just because it happens perhaps LATER than usual doesn't or shouldn't make any difference as far as I know. Yet a guy on YouTube I talked to said he talked to AT directly and they explicitly said there's NO DAC. Something isn't right here. lol
I'd pass on those remastering headphones George. My issue with them is the same issue with how Hi-Res is marketed. From my own research and experiences, despite what SOME ppl on here and other places may say or swear to believe, the higher resolution really has NOTHING to do with why Hi-Res (or even CD-Quality) music sounds better. Essentially, as long as it's ABOVE mp3 quality (which includes mp4/AAC, or next gen mp3, and the AAC is at 256 kbps or better), the sound quality will sound the same. The REAL reason why Hi-Res sounds so great is that the studios use SUPERIOR-SOUNDING MASTERS (or remasters) for these releases than they do for CD and ESPECIALLY mp3 releases. So that is why I'd never get these remastering headphones, because all they're doing is upscaling downscaled music. That's actually bad because if you are listening to a format of music in mp3 or mp4/AAC (aka lossy), they say that further conversions can introduce mild amounts of distortion (it's only when you convert lossless tracks like FLAC or ALAC that this doesn't happen). So increasing the resolution won't do ANYTHING for your music..............the master there is the master you hear. It can't get any better, it can only get worse, like if you downscale it to like 128 kbps mp3 (or lower). These remastering headphones are just "guessing" how the music would sound if it were mastered better (aka, the same tech you see in any phone or DAP that upscales, like the Sony ones). So I say, save your money for something better. I downscale ALL my Hi-Res and CD-Quality songs to like 512 kbps AAC (CBR), and it sounds the same. EXACTLY the same. And it frees up A TON of space on my cloud storage as well as my playing devices/phones. The smaller size also means less battery power is required to play them vs. larger 24/96 Hi-Res tracks, etc. It took me a WHILE to come to that realization.........but come to it I did. lol
Yeah I'm definitely with you on the M50x. Out of all the headphones I've ever tried, they were the WORST by far. They had the soundstage of a small closet. lol But I have heard good things about their more expensive models, so it is possible these are as good as the reviews say they are. There's also a cheaper version with the same Pure Digital Drive tech on it as well.
When you're going with something wireless, you're locked with theiir DAC and AMP. This can be a LOT of hit and miss, this is why some wireless items are amazing and some were not as liked.
One quick example is Senn M2 IEBT, a really good BT IEM.
The guys with the remastering headphones might have an interesting DAC and AMP module, I am far more curious about the headphones themselves than I am in the remastering part, but dual drivers, dual amps, and the promise of a good DAC are all nice sounding.
those audio technicas has cool design.
but honestly Sony is a no brainer for becuase of LDAC bluetooth which every phone will get with android O.